The following letter and report are being sent this week to a 
number of residents and organizations in the Ottawa area and
to the media.



                                                                                
                                        Ottawa September 1998


Dear Community Resident:        

We are a group of Ottawa area residents who share a concern 
about the impact of changing work patterns on our community. 
Two years ago we convened a Community Inquiry on Work which 
provided an opportunity for ourselves and other residents 
to share their work-related experiences, both paid and 
unpaid.

Through this process, and numerous conversations that took 
place around it, it became apparent that as a society we lack 
a coherent view about the place of work in our lives. Current 
perceptions of work and working appear to be preventing a 
more rewarding allocation of time and talent to the world's 
work.

We hope that you will read this report and share it with 
others in what ever manner you feel is appropriate. If you 
are involved in a community organization, please consider it 
as a topic for discussion. You are welcome to publish the 
report in your newsletter.

Thank you for your attention to the attached report.           

Sylvia Gold (convenor)    
Anne Betz    
Ann Denis    
Marilyn Fevrier    
Peter Johnson   
Marilynn Kuhn    
Gail Stewart    
Pat Webb                

For information:(613)729-0819, (613)730-0283, (613)730-2796               
     



                   COMMUNITY INQUIRY ON WORK

                           Final Report


Background

As a group of Ottawa residents we began meeting two years ago 
to consider the problems in this community associated with 
"work." We chose to convene as a Community Inquiry, a way of 
addressing issues of local importance in a reflective and 
mutually respectful manner.* We felt that the issue of work 
was of great importance and was troubling many people in the 
community in many ways.

Individuals we heard from in our inquiry on work tended to 
see the issues from a personal or short-term perspective and 
to seek solutions on that basis. For example, there were many 
stories about work overload (long hours, limited vacations, 
lack of family time). The problem tended to be seen as 
fallout from conditions at the individual's workplace: the 
"corporate culture." In other cases, where individuals were 
seeking income-producing work, they spoke of being unable to 
use the skills they had developed. And some, who have left 
(or not entered) the paid work force and would willingly work 
not for the money but for the usefulness and respect 
associated with work, are unable to find a role that feels 
"right." 

These, it turned out, were hints. The problems expressed 
often seemed unconnected or only vaguely related. And they 
did seem to be increasing.

Initial reflections 

Trying ourselves to understand the issues, we came to see the 
problems associated with work as indicators of long-term 
societal changes. These changes, we believe, are not yet 
widely recognized or appreciated. We think that a coherent 
systemic view may emerge as more of us talk with each other 
about work and working. This could lead to a more balanced, 
productive and less stressed society.

The history of social change has taught us that "issues" 
develop only when we begin to recognize our own personal 
experience as part of a common shared experience. Work 
reform, as a social movement, has barely begun. But there are 
signs the public's faith in traditional working arrangements 
and its associated values and ethics is eroding. There is a 
noticeable receptivity to ideas that challenge conventional 
wisdom about work. We need to find effective means to further 
public discussion and debate about work and the work 
revolution.

What seems to be missing in our community is a shared sense 
of the "big picture" of work and working:
        
        scope         -- work as an immense body of activity 
                      that could be defined as including 
                      much, if not most, of what each of us 
                      does daily 
        recognition   -- work as consisting of unpaid and also 
                      paid activity 
        re-valuing    -- unpaid work, including volunteer work, 
                      as the unacknowledged lifeblood of 
                      communities     
        distribution  -- work as something that some people have 
                      too much of, while others are looking 
                      for more          
        clarification -- work as an activity people may say they 
                      want when they really mean they want 
                      income, or respect, or colleagues, or 
                      something to structure their days, or 
                      feel they have a contribution to make 
        awareness     -- work as something that needs thinking 
                      and talking about to make our lives 
                      more satisfying and keep our 
                      communities productive 
        flexibility   -- working arrangements as inventions that 
                      can be altered   

We believe that the public discussion of work, ranging from 
individual experiences to the larger picture, is important. 
What seems to be needed are opportunities to talk about work 
in settings where people feel safe and comfortable about 
sharing their thoughts and feelings about work. 

Our conversations generated many good ideas. Ideas that can 
be undertaken by any of us as we go about our daily lives. 
These included initiating informal conversations in our 
families, workplaces or in social gatherings. On a broader 
level, it can be discussions scheduled at conferences, 
workshops, or through task forces. Organizations, alone or in 
partnership, can convene research projects or pilot projects. 
The community can be involved through discussions in public 
spaces such as shopping malls or community centres. Games can 
be developed to encourage small groups to explore the issues. 
Essay contests can engage the interest of some people, and 
discussion groups on community cable TV can generate yet more 
interest and involvement.

Our enquiry shows that we can all pioneer, in our own 
communities, innovative and creative responses to our work 
arrangements. This can occur through our own unique solutions 
or through adoption of ideas that have proved their worth 
elsewhere. Whatever we choose to do we will be doing 
ourselves and others an invaluable service.

Our hope is that this brief report will promote discussions 
about work that will contribute to the development of the 
kind of society we all want our work to support.
                 
Sylvia Gold (convenor)
Anne Betz
Ann Denis
Marilyn Fevrier
Peter Johnson
Marilynn Kuhn
Gail Stewart
Pat Webb 
        
For information: (613)729-0819, (613)730-0283, (613)730-2796
                                              
Ottawa September 1998



* Our interim and final reports on the concept of community 
inquiries and on work are available on National Capital 
Freenet. At the prompt, type "go misc" (without the quotation 
marks) and look for the headings "Community Inquiries," and 
"Community Inquiry on Work." These have been created as 
Special Interest Groups (SIGs). The final report on Community 
Inquiries includes some guidelines for community inquiries.






--
Gail Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to