Eva Durant wrote,
>however, I am not familiar with your response
>to the argument, that shorter working hours
>and more people employed causes the fall of
>profits, due to larger contributions and
>labour costs. If it wasn't so, why business
>cannot be cajoled with the already existing
>incentives to cut working hours and employ
>more people?
For "my" response, stated coherently by someone you allegedly respect, read
Chapter 10 of Marx's Capital: "The Working Day". "*Quantum mutatus ab
illo!*" "What a great change from that time!"
>Capitalist economic structure with
>a human face is a short lived
>timewasting irrationality.
In my opinion, capitalism is not the "enemy". The *problem* is the failure
of the proletariat to rise as a revolutionary counterforce to capitalism.
One hundred and fifty years may be short-lived, but it's still three times
as long as I've been around.
Regards,
Tom Walker
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
#408 1035 Pacific St.
Vancouver, B.C.
V6E 4G7
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(604) 669-3286
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The TimeWork Web: http://www.vcn.bc.ca/timework/
