Dear Dr. Galbraith:

Please take these comments as those of an educated layman, who worked
in the international derivitives markets for many years. I have no "ism"
to sell, although my values lean towards ecological-economics. 

Cheers,
Steven B. Kurtz

(excerpts below from your text,which was posted to Futurework List intact)
 full text available at: http://epn.org/galb/jg980707.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        "The Butterfly Effect"

Copyright © 1998 by James K. Galbraith. 

Small actions can have large consequences. The mathematics of chaos teaches
that a butterfly, flapping its wings in Brazil, can set off a chain of
events leading to a hurricane at Cape Fear. 

SK:
"can ..." is different than "will" or "must necessarily".

On March 24, 1997, the butterfly was named Alan Greenspan. That day, he
flapped his wings just once, raising the interest rate by one-quarter of
one
percent point. 

SK: 
Greenspan cannot act alone; he does exert above average influence.


Global currency instability started just about then. The Thai crisis hit
three months later.

SK:
Currency rates respond within second, hours, days. Three months is
an eternity for a supposed response.


 After that, it wasn't just the Asian Rim currencies .. Yen...
.. Taiwan and Australian dollars. And ...an index representing
the Euro. Indeed there was a worldwide devaluation, leaving only the
British
pound and the U.S. dollar flying high. Seen this way, the so-called "Asian
crisis" was not restricted to Asia.

SK:
It is not normal to refer to slightly weaker rates (ex. D.Mark & F.Franc)
as a "crisis". In fact, 10-20% annual trading ranges are the norm for 
many currency relationships. Frequently countries *desire* a lowering of
the relative (only kind of) value of their currency for competitive
reasons.


What caused the differences? Roughly, currencies collapsed in proportion to
their dependence on American capital. Those hit hardest were those that
have
relied most on our investments, that had the least resident wealth, that
were most caught up in construction booms financed by short-term inflows.

SK:
America is but one global player. Isn't it possible that the devaluations
were
in accordance with % of relative overvalue? Artificially high levels can be
set
by pegs, to enhance the conversion(to other currency based investments)
value of funds looted by an elite from an economy. The collusion of foreign
governments and TNCs is also possible. These pegs give a sense of risk
avoidance to foreign investors, who seek high returns with limited risk.
When there is an unsustainable, artificial value ascribed to anything, it
eventually adjusts. What is unfair in my view, is for taxpayers to bail out
investors. 


When U.S. interest rates started to rise, dollar-sensitive investors came
home. The dollar went up, and its closest dependencies, like Suharto's
rupiah, were the greatest victims. In short, this was a crisis of the
American financial empire.

SK:
A 1/4% change in a 5+ % rate is historically 'static'. The slippage of
liquidating some foreign investments and reinvesting in US or elsewhere
(incl. commissions and bid/offer spreads) offsets that fractional *annual*
rate increase. It had little effect on the US equity mkt., which
traditionally loses when treasury bill rates rise.
 

But since
this crisis was made in Washington,

SK:
That is a conclusion that has not been substantiated.


... it cannot be ended in Seoul or Djakarta.
Reforms of Asian domestic policies may be necessary. But they cannot cure a
problem that was caused, most fundamentally, by our own policies that
raised
real and relative interest rates.

SK:
Even if one accepts your conclusion(I don't), your certainty re future cure 
is speculative at best. Local actions may be the best source of remedy;
bioregional ecosystem health is the ultimate basis of human and economic
health
in the view of many economists like Daly & Cobb.


Equally, the vast capital inflows into the United States in 1997 -- the
portfolio investments that fueled the boom in the American stock market --

SK:
The US equity mkt has been in a boom for 8 years, with a tripling of
averages.


were kicked off by Greenspan's rate hike (and the expectation that more
would follow).

SK:
Expected sequential rate hikes drive investments out of equities into short
term cash
equivalents, and sometimes into long term bonds since recession and
deflation could be feared as a result.


 The consequences for the American productive economy are now
surfacing in a vast increase in the U.S. trade deficit, as exports tumble
and cheapened imports flood our markets, and as falling exports lead to
slower economic growth and rising unemployment. These consequences will
multiply if we fail to act quickly -- and correctly.

SK:
Agreed. The U.S. has a speculative bubble not unlike Japan 10 years ago.


And so the debate at the Federal Reserve's Open Market Committee is between
those who say "raise rates" and those who say, "not yet." Greenspan and the
"not yet" faction have held the line so far. But such a stalemate must
always end, eventually, in a rate increase - never, until much too late, in
a rate cut.

Today, on the contrary, interest rates must come down. Indeed, interest
rates should be cut sharply -- let's say two full percentage points -- to
meet the global crisis.

SK:
The magic of credit! More tokens circulating combined with a net growth in
human
numbers of *250,000 DAILY* would only speed our consumption of future
generations real wealth, the natural capital and regenerative capacities of
earth. A simple metaphor is a dog chasing it's tail. If interest rates were
zero, no increase on real wealth would ensue. Tokens & credits cannot be
eaten, drunk, or used as fuel. 

Further steps, of which the mildest would be a Tobin
Tax on capital flows and speculative transactions, might help.

SK:
It would redistribute some tokens.

The proposed
multilateral agreement on investments (MAI) should be abandoned, and the
U.S. should instead recognize the fundamental right of every state to
control the immigration and emigration of capital.

SK:
Agreed. But the regimes in power can still loot their own countries!

That loan to Japan was a
good step; more may be needed later.

SK:
Japan is the second wealthiest nation. Why should American taxpayers pass
credits (tax revenues in disguise) to them via IMF or another conduit?

 Special measures for Russia are
urgently needed, as that giant country, a security issue for the entire
globe, continues its slide toward disaster.

SK: 
Not as "giant" as before the USSR breakup! The whole planet is in a "slide
towards
disaster". Take a look at warnings from thousands of scientists including
the majority of living Nobel winners:

http://dieoff.org/page1.htm

SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS
  RS AND NAS STATEMENT is the official 1992 statement of the Royal Society
and the National
Academy of Sciences. 
  WORLD SCIENTISTS' WARNING TO HUMANITY is from the Union of Concerned
Scientists in
1992.
  WORLD SCIENTISTS' CALL FOR ACTION AT THE KYOTO CLIMATE SUMMIT
  Science Summit" on World Population: A Joint Statement by 58 of the
World's Scientific Academies.


By stemming capital inflows, such actions might send stock prices downward
at first; a boom based on capital inflows will not continue when they stop.
But stock prices will recover if U.S. economic growth is sustained by an
early recovery of the world economy, of other currencies and of our export
markets. The alternative: more global instability and more of our own
debt-driven bubble, followed by a prolonged collapse, could be -- chaos. 

SK:
Global Finance is a "magical mystery tour". No one can consistently predict
the future  prices of anything. Human e-value-ation is both subjective and
relative; and that, along with supply, is the then current determinant of
economic decisions. What is certain is the daily shrinkage of the 'pie',
and the average size slice/human. What is highly probable, according to
scientific consensus, is the unsustainability of economic & population
growth.  Credit expansion (which like all fiat money is created out of
nothing) only speeds the rate of the dog chasing it's tail. 

Steven B. Kurtz
Fitzwilliam N.H.

Reply via email to