From: MichaelP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 21:11:07 -0800 (PST)
Subject: EU to make firms consult workers on business plans


   THE European Commission will prepare the way today for a new law under
   the social chapter that would require all but the smallest firms to
   consult their employees on future policy and would render void any
   sackings without such action.

   The move, which would greatly extend an existing law that covers large
   multinational companies, is aimed at bringing Britain and Ireland into
   line with continental practice which requires firms to operate works
   councils.

   The Government has criticised the idea as an unnecessary burden on
   business but, under the social chapter, which Britain is joining in
   the Treaty of Amsterdam, any opposition could be overruled by a
   majority vote.

   The Commission's decision comes as ministers meet in Brussels today to
   prepare for the European Union "jobs summit" later this month at which
   Britain will press for easing the burden of regulations on employers.
   Tony Blair has been urging EU leaders to refrain from using the social
   chapter to pass new laws that could inflict more red tape on business.

   Britain has already signed up to laws on parental leave, the rights of
   part-time workers and shifting the burden of proof in sexual
   discrimination cases. The proposed law on consultation will test the
   Government's commitment to improved workers' rights against the
   potentially conflicting drive for more flexible labour regulation.

   Under the rules of the social chapter, the Commission will give EU
   employers' organisations and unions six weeks to decide whether to
   negotiate their own version of a consultation law. Failing this,
   Padraig Flynn, the Social Affairs Commissioner, will submit a draft
   law for the member states to enact.

   In an initial discussion this summer, employers resisted the scheme
   and unions favoured it. Two pieces of legislation have already been
   enacted through agreement between the social partners, as the
   employers and unions are called.

   British officials said yesterday that Government favoured such
   negotiations as the best route for drafting the proposed consultation
   law. However, when the idea was first mooted last June, Downing Street
   said: "We are not in favour of new regulation in this area."

   The legislation is intended to curb "social dumping", in which
   "companies shop around for places that have low requirements in
   industrial relations", an EU official said. Britain, with its low
   employment costs, is deemed on the Continent to be the worst
   "offender".

   A commission document released today says the proposed law would
   provide equal treatment for all workers across the EU "to avoid
   discrimination and to ensure greater compatibility between national
   provisions".

   It must enshrine "the right of workers to be informed and consulted
   ... on the economic situation and the future outlook of the company
   and on any decisions likely to affect them".

   This is intended to benefit workers and companies by improving morale
   and helping staff to adapt to rapidly changing conditions.

   Mr Flynn wants the law to have teeth in the form of penalties against
   firms that flout the legal obligation to consult.

   Public pressure on the Commission for such action has come from highly
   publicised cases of factory closure, notably a decision by the vehicle
   manufacturer Renault to sack 2,000 workers at its plant in Brussels
   earlier this year.

   The main proposed penalty would be to annul dismissal notices or any
   other decisions affecting the conditions of employment.

   The Commission is not formally setting the size of company that will
   come under the law, but Mr Flynn has cited a minimum of 50 employees
   as a desirable target.

   Under the existing multinational law, which is deemed by many British
   companies to have been beneficial, only firms employing at least 2,000
   workers in two or more member states are required to set up works
   councils.

   The Commission insists that the new scheme should allow for a less
   formal structure than works councils.

** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving this information for research and educational purposes. **





Reply via email to