Forwarded message.
D ate: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 20:11:53 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Bob Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Socializing Bank Losses, part I





        ...it is the people of Indonesia who are being forced by
        the IMF to pay the cost, a process Canadian currency
        specialist Albert Friedberg calls "socializing the losses."

        In Korea, the government was not running a big deficit. It was
        the private sector that had all the debt. Now the IMF is...
        saying the government is going to have to guarantee the debt of
        the private companies in order to obtain more financing.
        ...the taxpayers of Korea will be paying now for losses on bad
        investments made by Citibank and Chase. 


 http://www.theglobeandmail.com/docs/news/19980110/ROBColumn/RCORC.html

 Toronto Globe and Mail  Saturday, January 10, 1998

 Asian panic set to travel   By Terence Corcoran

 INTERNATIONAL Monetary Fund chief Michel Camdessus flies to Indonesia
 early next week, where presumably he will explain to the panicky
 people of that country -- indeed, the people of all Asia -- why they
 are being forced by the IMF to bear the burden of a financial collapse
 that is not their doing. The major cause of public unease in Indonesia
 is the IMF-orchestrated devaluation of the rupiah, now 60 per cent
 since November. The devaluation, in turn, is the product of a
 collapsed credit bubble that fed a vast network of corporate interests
 associated with the Suharto dictatorship.

 It is these networks, and the banks that supported them, that were
 major beneficiaries of the decade-long boom in Indonesia. But it is
 the people of Indonesia who are being forced by the IMF to pay the
 cost, a process Canadian currency specialist Albert Friedberg calls
 "socializing the losses." The same distribution of losses among all
 taxpayers is taking place in South Korea and the other Asian countries
 where the IMF, backed by the United States, is moving in with programs
 that can only exacerbate the Asian economic crisis.

 Mr. Friedberg heads Friedberg Mercantile Group of Toronto and writes
 unconventional commentaries on currencies that appear in the
 company's monthly newsletter. From Mr. Friedberg's free-market
 perspective, grounded in Austrian School economic theory, the Asian
 crisis has its origins in overexpansion of credit by the U.S. Federal
 Reserve that will, in time, come back to haunt the U.S. economy.

 How are losses being socialized?

 "In the end, the IMF is pushing these countries to socialize the
 losses, where the losses to be taken are really the losses of 30
 corporations," Mr. Friedberg said in an interview yesterday.
 "Suddenly, now the whole country is going to be shouldering those
 losses. Aside from a few things that the IMF did that are good --
 things like opening up markets, supporting deregulation and
 transparency -- the rest of what they're doing is incorrect. They're
 pushing the countries into a tremendous contraction. In Korea, the
 government was not running a big deficit. It was the private sector
 that had all the debt. Now the IMF is coming in and saying the
 government is going to have to guarantee the debt of the private
 companies in order to obtain more financing. In effect, the taxpayers
 of Korea will be paying now for losses on bad investments made by
 Citibank and Chase. The intelligent thing to have done would be to
 say to the banks: 'You lent the money to these Korean private
 companies. If they can't pay, they can't pay. They declare
 bankruptcy, you lose money.' "

 Would Asian currencies be stronger without the IMF plan?

 "If the IMF had let the companies declare bankruptcy and let Chase and
 Citibank worry about that, then the currencies would not have gone
 down as much as they have -- by far. The reason you have a sense of
 panic is because there's a feeling that you have to cover the value of
 that foreign debt, even if you're broke. These companies are broke.
 Why are they buying dollars to pay back debt? You would have had much
 less pressure on the foreign exchange market than you have at the
 moment. The pressure is to buy back the dollars, and so everybody's
 panicking. So the Indonesia rupiah yesterday went below 11,000 rupiah
 to the U.S. dollar, which is a decline of 50 per cent in three days."

 How did the Federal Reserve cause this?

 "The U.S. central bank restarted the credit expansion process (in
 early 1990s) all too successfully. They got a huge increase in
 consumer credit, they aided an enormous increase in speculation in
 credit markets and securities markets. And they exported credit
 abroad, with U.S. banks becoming big lenders of money to all kinds of
 emerging countries, and investors became convinced the growth rate in
 these countries was much better than it was in the United States.
 Unfortunately, this credit expansion did not create inflation -- I say
 unfortunately, because price inflation might have stopped the credit
 expansion in its tracks."

 But if there's no price inflation, why worry?

 "Here's where we have to separate the definitions of inflation.
 Inflation is not just a rise in prices. It's a state of affairs that
 says credit is too easy. Easy credit will inevitably lead to rising
 prices, but over a longer period of time. But easy credit surely
 leads to a process of excess credit creation where people borrow
 money to go into all kinds of speculative ventures. These credit
 cycles are really the causes of trade depressions. So you're right -
 - there's no price inflation, and some people are even worried about
 price deflation. We don't believe that's possible with the rate of
 monetary expansion we have now. But what we could get -- and this is
 the real danger -- is debt deflation."

 What's the effect of debt deflation?

 "If the central bank stopped injecting credit, you get a situation
 where creditors start to demand repayment from debtors who can't pay.
 Debt deflation can cause a depression."

 So what's next?

 "The crisis will widen. It will travel from Asia to Russia, Greece,
 Brazil. Eventually it will come back to the United States. It will
 not be a repeat of the 1970s, because the monetary expansion isn't
 as great. But the liquidity is in the system and we believe the United
 States is going to go into a very large trade deficit in the next few
 years. Then the U.S. dollar will come under pressure and you will
 start getting price inflation. The whole world is resting on the
 United States' shoulders right now, because the U.S. economy is still
 strong, and everybody needs the United States to be strong because
 everybody else is going to try to export their way out of their
 problems."

 Copyright © 1998, The Globe and Mail Company
 ............................................

 Read the second article published the same day:
 http://www.theglobeandmail.com/docs/news/19980110/GlobeFront/UINDON.html


 Bob Olsen      Toronto         [EMAIL PROTECTED]   (:-)


[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to