>But if a 32 hour work week is more expensive >than a 40 hour week, why are we surprised when no one bites? A 32-hour work week is more expensive only because of the high component of fixed non-wage labour costs. Most of those fixed costs arise from legislation, not from market forces. Lars Osberg talks about "leveling the playing field for hours of work" and, for much of the extra cost, that's all that needs to be done. I've done the numbers on this (http://www.vcn.bc.ca/timework/timework.htm). Yes, a 32 hour work week is more expensive -- but that's a government policy not a fact of nature or an economic law. Regards, Tom Walker ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Vancouver, B.C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (604) 669-3286 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The TimeWork Web: http://www.vcn.bc.ca/timework/
- Re: FW Some hard questions about a Basic Income 1 Tom Walker
- Re: FW Some hard questions about a Basic Income... Jim Dator
- Re: FW Some hard questions about a Basic In... Tor Forde
- Re: FW Some hard questions about a Basic In... Dennis Paull
- Re: FW Some hard questions about a Basi... Franklin Wayne Poley
- Re: FW Some hard questions about a Basic Income 1 Tom Walker
- Re: FW Some hard questions about a Basic Income 1 Durant
- Re: FW Some hard questions about a Basic Income 1 Tom Walker
- Re: FW Some hard questions about a Basic Income 1 Tom Walker
- Re: FW Some hard questions about a Basic Income 1 Thomas Lunde
- Re: FW Some hard questions about a Basic Income... Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
- Re: FW Some hard questions about a Basic Income 1 Thomas Lunde
- Re: FW Some hard questions about a Basic Income 1 Tom Walker
- Re: FW Some hard questions about a Basic Income 1 Dennis Paull
- Re: FW Some hard questions about a Basic Income 1 Tom Walker