I know many former artists who have good jobs in the sciences, however the
reverse is rarely true. Why?
Eva Durant wrote:
> Both describe reality in different ways.
> One person is able to do both. I don't think
> artists are predisposed against being good at
> science and vice versa.
>
> Eva
>
> >
> > > Science is a method. I detest any separation of
> > > thinking into "artist" and "scientist". I think we
> > > all do and need both, but this has nothing to do with
> > > the way science works.
> >
> > "Detest" doesn't say anything. Because both hands are the body doesn't mean
> > that both hands are the same.
> >
> > REH
> >
> >
