Are these kind of transitional demands?
Because they contain no solution to the
problem of the basic capitalist mechanism
of production - there will be not enough profits made
based on this tax-scheme to make capitalist
enterprises viable. So you just wait until they collapse,
and then there will be no other alternatives but
for the employees to take over ownership
and management at last?
Hear, hear...

Eva


> 
>  1.   Reduce the length of the work-week (4 day)
>  2.   Extend ESOPs (Employee Stock Ownership Plans)
>  3.   Extra tax on corporations not participating in ESOPs (to be used by
>  govt. to buy  stocks on behalf of employees)
>  4.   Educational system cultivating a mind-set geared to self-employment
>  and the "meaningful" use of leisure time
>  5.   Corporate "profit centres" become employee owned
>  6.   Individual persona incorporated into expert systems and royalties
>  paid for each use, e.g. actors' attributes may be incorporated into
>  computerized images
>  7.   Infomediary professionals trained to facilitate the interface
>  between people and their automated systems
>  8.   Give greater official encouragement to the establishment of
>  role-playing societies (pioneer villages, period societies (e.g. 18th
>  century society),  etc.), "living museums"
>  9.   Establish system of micropayments (perhaps modeled after LETS
>  (Local  Employment (Exchange) Trading System) in which people accumulate
>  an income through numerous microtransactions
>  10. Right to privacy modified to include a right to payment for providing
>  the personal data (including opinions) required to support the automated
>  economy
>  11. While business may still compete, nevertheless inculcate a more
>  cooperative mode  conducive to the sharing of information (perhaps
>  primarily but not solely via the Internet) by forming cross-institutional
> teams
>  characterized by information literacy
>  12.  Founding of voluntary neighbourhood productive associations
>  ("consentives" - to use  Robert Theobald's term) may be particularly
>  applicable to low income areas
>  13.  Encourage the expansion of DIY (do-it-yourself) activities taking
>  advantage of  sophisticated hi-tech instructional systems (which may also
> provide access  to LETS so people can easily find those who can help, given
> that they
>  have neither the time nor inclination to complete a task)
>  14.  And then there's the Tobin Tax, a proposed tax on global
>  corporations' electronic financial transactions
>  15.  The role of volunteers is critically important to many organizations
>  dedicated to  helping the disadvantaged. Some firms grant paid leave to
>  employees who can provide skilled help to such organizations. The
>  volunteer system may be a vehicle for transferring wealth indirectly
>  16.   "1984" with a new face: Pervasive global electronic surveillance
>  systems ensure that _each one_ of the earth's billions of people can be
>  acknowledged and their needs entered into a database - something like GPS
>  (Geographical Positioning Systems) ensuring that no one need ever be lost
>  again
>  17.   The practice of "twinning" cities, "adopting" highways may be
>  extended globally to possibly establish a more grassroots approach to
>  Third World development as an alternative to the International Monetary Fund.
> 
>  Information may replace money as the means to development. Outfits like
>  CESO (Canadian Executive Service Organization), CUSO  (Canadian
>  University Service Overseas) and the US Peace Corps may be precursors
> 
>  ... etc.
> 
>  A note to those who almost inevitably will assume that I am a proponent
>  of these thoughts - I'm _not_.  These are probes only (to use Marshall
>  McLuhan's words).
> 
> 
> --
> http://publish.uwo.ca/~mcdaniel/
> 
> 

Reply via email to