Good Day, John, and other friends,

Getting old is better than than any of the alternatives, but it does make you 
realize that the necessary work probably cannot be completed in the time we 
have left.

You wrote, on 99-08-26, among other things:

>> The problem will be to get an international decision to draw-up and apply
laws based on any principles you define. <<

This idea came to mind only recently, that if each nation would impliment the 
first and second rule of all well managed corporations, following Adam 
Smith's First Maxim Of Taxation, the result might be a fairly stable and 
prosperous global economy even if the nations could not agree on what 
international decisions were needed.  After all, our well managed 
corporations do not share their methods with their conpetition.

Briefly stated, Smith's first maxim says that the expense of government is 
like the expense of management.  Not all of the ten corporations I worked for 
were well managed, but none of them departed very far from, and each kept 
secret from the public, these two rules:

1, Adequately fund the corporation's development (engineering) function 
(about 10% of $sales), which for the commonwealth is the education and 
support of all children.

2, Adequately fund the executive compensation budget (about 10% of $sales).  
In the U.S. we pay our Congressmen about 4.5 times the average wage, or 
$135,000/year.  But our Congressmen and Senators must raise an additional 
$1,000,000/year to cover their campaign expenses every two or four years. 

Our elected representatives (? Democracy ?) face a greater financial obstacle 
than a worker trying to support a wife and four children on the minimum wage. 
 And we wonder why corruption is so common.  

My Figure 1 of the Global Model at 
<http://www.freespeech.org/darves/bert.html> shows that only the U.S. and the 
U.K. impliment the first rule at 50% of an adequate level, while the other 
industrial nations fully implimented rule 1 by 1946.  I don't have any data 
on how well other nations impliment the second rule, but who ever pays those 
campaign expenses, makes the laws.

Maybe these two rules would make sense to the public, if enough reformers 
could agree on them and talk them up.  When these two rules are followed, 
every thing else is easy in the corporation.

Regards,

WesBurt

Reply via email to