Ray Evans Harrell wrote:
/(Note for 2004: to all people trained in speed reading. I would recommend skipping this post. I was trained in poetry and theology. I do not write for speed readers. Cheers. REH)/

Why can't all the printed matter that *is* meant for speed reading be so organized that the reader doesn't need to know how to speed-read?

"You know": start with an abstract. Have the first paragraph
of each chapter summarize the chapter, the first sentence of
each paragraph summarize the paragraph, etc.?

Anything that can be speed-read probably should not
have been written "that way" in the first place.  The
"distilled" version (per above) *should* require
real engagement with each of its [mercifully few...]
words.

Conversely, every sentence really should "count" in
text that is not meant to be speed-read.

So, maybe, if used *intelligently* (a use it may not
encourage!), PowerPoint may have constructive potential
after all (pace Edward Tufte).

Now to read what you wrote....

\brad mcormick

--
  Let your light so shine before men,
              that they may see your good works.... (Matt 5:16)

Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thes 5:21)

<![%THINK;[SGML+APL]]> Brad McCormick, Ed.D. / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
  Visit my website ==> http://www.users.cloud9.net/~bradmcc/
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to