Do you believe in positive and negative? FWP <http://www.geocities.com/machine_psychology/The_Ghost_In_The_Machine>
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I really don't believe in "good" or "evil" > > arthur > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ray Evans Harrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 5, 2004 11:18 AM > To: Cordell, Arthur: ECOM; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Futurework] Selective breeding? > > > Because there are villains in every culture and often they are the one's who > survive. The only moral way out of that dilemma is to admit and struggle > for one's ideals. Otherwise righteous ideas are polluted by > self-righteousness and decline begins. > > REH > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:06 AM > Subject: RE: [Futurework] Selective breeding? > > > How so? What do you mean? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ray Evans Harrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, January 4, 2004 2:19 PM > To: Cordell, Arthur: ECOM; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Futurework] Selective breeding? > > > I don't agree with Chris on his blatent prejudice on this but I don't think > your statement is true either. You paint yourself into an unteneable > corner. IMHO > > REH > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 10:59 AM > Subject: RE: [Futurework] Selective breeding? > > > > The statement that one could escape a pogrom or a planned extermination is > > just that: A statement. Nothing negative, nothing positive. Neither a > good > > act or a bad act. An act. That's all. > > > > arthur > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: mcandreb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 5:38 AM > > To: Keith Hudson; Cordell, Arthur: ECOM > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [Futurework] Selective breeding? > > > > > > Victor Frankel said in his book "Man's Search For Meaning" that the > > 'best' human beings did not survive the concentration camps because they > > freely gave their lives so that others might live. > > > > "Tis a far far better thing I do than I've ever done before.." > > > > Brian McAndrews > > > > > > > [emsg.txt] > > > Arfthur, > > > > > > At 19:30 02/01/2004 -0500, you wrote: > > > >How about this: Those who were average or with lower acuity to > > > >surroundings were eliminated in various pogroms. *If* there was > > > >a selective breeding, perhaps it was based on the quickest, > > > smartest > > > >most aware were able to move or outwit the killers. > > > > > > Yes, that must have been a factor, too -- in much the same way that > > > the > > > rich of Baghdad took holidays in Syria while the bombing went on > > > during the > > > invasion. Also, because of the bipolar nature of the Jewish law on > > > usury, > > > the rich merchants would have good contacts with the Gentile > > > establishment > > > in the cities. Just as the rich Jews and intelligentsia were able to > > > get > > > out of Germany in the years before WWII, so might the richer merchants > > > in > > > Russia and Poland, etc have been able to tell their contacts to > > > withdraw > > > from the Jewish villages and ghettos when progroms were being rumoured > > > at > > > high level. > > > > > > Keith > > > > > > > > > > >arthur > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: Keith Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 1:30 AM > > > >To: Tor F�rde > > > >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Subject: Re: [Futurework] Selective breeding? > > > > > > > >At 23:18 01/01/2004 +0100, you wrote: > > > >>I was wondering about the theory of Keith Hudson about selective > > > breeding > > > >>of jews in Eastern Europe. > > > > > > > >It's not a theory of mine. It's an observation from history. > > > > > > > >> The aim of selective breeding is to develop a specie who carries > > > some > > > >> preferred qualities by allowing only those carring these qualities > > > to breed. > > > > > > > >That's what animal breeders do. In western society today anybody can > > > >breed. Or, rather, any woman can breed if she finds a male that she > > > thinks > > > >will be a good father and provider. Eugenics got a bad name in the > > > last > > > >century because the state or medical authorities decided who should > > > breed. > > > > > > > >> Where only the most intelligent jews allowed to get children? What > > > >> about the more ordinary jews, Keith? > > > > > > > >Whoever said that "ordinary" Jews couldn't breed? I didn't say so. > > > > > > > >Keith > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>Hilsen > > > >>Tor F�rde > > > >>email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>_______________________________________________ > > > >>Futurework mailing list > > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework > > > > > > > >Keith Hudson, Bath, England, <www.evolutionary-economics.org> > > > > > > Keith Hudson, Bath, England, <www.evolutionary-economics.org> > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Futurework mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Futurework mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework > > > _______________________________________________ > Futurework mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework > _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
