Robert and Ed,
 
This is a very sad state that children find themselves in.  I've never seen so much irresponsibility.   Now they are even throwing kids in jail for school infractions.   Jail is a great teacher but it teaches people to be criminals not better citizens.  On the one hand information is withheld from parents and then when the crash comes, the parents are impotent in their ignorance.   Its even worse in college when underage students are expected to be paid for by parents but the parents are not privy to grades, health records, etc.   It springs from both left and right.   With the left screaming individual freedom and the right screaming hold them responsible while this takes the onus off bad parents and bad teachers.   It is disgusting and is system wide.   This does not mean that I believe the schools are hopeless and going to hell in a handbasket.   But this element of it is in severe need of rethinking from both left and right wings.   The problem is that neither seems to know much about education or cooperation.   Education is always a team effort if the best is to be drawn from the student.
 
REH
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Killing its own

Ed,
 
What is happening in the United States is a great tragedy, not likely to end in November, unfortunately.  The internal war against kids has also been extended to education.    See below from Chicago.
 
Bob
 
SCHOOLS PRESSURED TO DUMP BAD STUDENTS, CRITICS SAY
      Chicago Sun-Times -- January 9, 2004
                  by Kate Grossman

Phillip Parker knew he was in the wrong when he started skipping class
and getting into trouble at Chicago's Crane High School. But before he
could figure out how to fix it, he found himself dropped from school.

"I'm not one to blame others for what I did, but if the school had
steered me the right way, it could have helped," said Parker, who says
teachers and staff seemed too busy to really give him the help he needed.

After dropping out, he landed a spot at West Town Academy, an
alternative school. He knows he's one of the lucky ones.

"A lot of students just give up," Parker said. "It's almost like their
life has no direction, they ain't got nothing going."

In the 2001-02 school year, 17,400 students -- 17.6 percent -- dropped
out of Chicago schools, according to an analysis of state data by the
Greater West Town Community Development Project. That's up from 13.5
percent in 1992. The Chicago public schools publicize a lower percentage
-- 13 percent in 2003, down from 16.6 percent in 1995. Those percentages
don't include 27 alternative schools.

The numbers are too high and the pressure on schools to push out truant,
low-performing students is only growing, several experts, including
Illinois Education Supt. Robert Schiller, testified at a state Senate
Education Committee meeting in Chicago Thursday.

The main culprit is the federal No Child Left Behind law, Schiller and
others said. That law requires schools to meet testing, graduation and
attendance benchmarks each year.

"There is tremendous pressure on districts," said Sen. Miguel del Valle
(D-Chicago), the committee chairman. "All of this is creating a climate
that, as the superintendent says, creates a disincentive to hang on to
students and help them go the extra mile to stay in school."

Del Valle convened the hearing to come up with legislative ideas to
confront Illinois' dropout problem. Statewide, the rate is 4.9 percent.
Suggestions floated at the hearing include more accurate counting of the
problem, more small schools, such as Chicago is trying, more emphasis on
early childhood education and more academic support for middle schoolers
and ninth-graders.

Del Valle has one bill pending that would make it more difficult to drop
students, make it easier for them to return and change the way they're
counted so they can be tracked and schools aren't penalized if they drop
out again.

Several advocates support the proposal but say the existing law must
also be enforced. State law says students over 16 can only be denied an
education if they are expelled for serious misconduct or if they don't
have enough credits to graduate by the time they're 21.

"The dropout problem is largely a push-out problem for kids who'd like
to stay in school," said William Leavy, director of the Greater West
Town group. "Our neediest kids have the least support."

Added Bob Meyer, a teacher at West Town Academy: "We think [Chicago] and
other districts should be mandated to do what we do daily -- give kids
another chance."

----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Weick
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:19 AM
Subject: [Futurework] Killing its own

As a Canadian, I find the behaviour of the US administration increasingly perplexing and difficult to understand.  Killing people, including kids, in Afghanistan and Iraq is one thing, but killing its own is incomprehensible.  More and more, one gets the impression that America exists for the ownership class, the top five percent or even one percent, and no one else matters!  Rogue abroad and rogue at home!
 
Ed

 
 
The New York Times In America

January 9, 2004
OP-ED COLUMNIST

Sick State Budgets, Sick Kids

By BOB HERBERT

While headlines continue to tell us how great the economy is doing, states across the U.S. are pulling the plug on desperately needed health coverage for low-income Americans, including about a half-million children.

Even as the Bush administration continues its bizarre quest for ever more tax cuts, the states, which by law have to balance their budgets, are cutting vital social programs so deeply that tragic consequences are inevitable.

The cruel reality is that Americans at the top are thriving at the expense of the well-being of those at the bottom and, increasingly, in the middle.

A new report by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities shows that 34 states have made potentially devastating cuts over the past two years in public health insurance programs, including Medicaid and the very successful children's health insurance programs known as CHIPS. More cuts are expected this year.

"Almost half of those losing health coverage (490,000 to 650,000 people) are children," the report said. "Substantial numbers of low-income parents, seniors, people with disabilities, childless adults and immigrants are also losing coverage. Cutbacks of this depth in health insurance coverage for low-income families and individuals are unprecedented."

The worst of the cuts are in Texas. "The Lone Star State has adopted deep cutbacks in its State Children's Health Insurance Program that will cause about 160,000 children — one-third of its SCHIP caseload — to lose coverage," the report said.

Texas is also making Medicaid available to fewer pregnant women, a dangerous move that increases the number of women without coverage for prenatal care and the actual deliveries. "All told," the report said, "Texas is eliminating coverage for between 344,000 and 494,000 children and adults. Census data showed that, even before these changes, the percentage of people who were uninsured was higher in Texas than in any other state."

A loss of health coverage frequently leads to a reluctance to seek needed care. "In poor or low-income families, where there is not a lot of disposable income, people will avoid going to the doctor or getting a prescription," said Leighton Ku, one of the authors of the report. "Certain diseases can then become much more severe. With children, it's likely that they won't get treatment for ear infections, asthma, diabetes — conditions that can ultimately lead to hospitalization."

When treatment can no longer be avoided, the financial consequences can be ruinous. Medical expenses are one of the leading causes of bankruptcy in the U.S.

Officials at the center noted the case of a woman in St. Louis who works but whose annual income is below the poverty line. Under eligibility rules in effect until 18 months ago, she would have qualified for Medicaid. Under the new rules, she does not.

The woman became ill and was told upon her release from the hospital to seek follow-up care. But without any health insurance, her medical bills have been overwhelming. According to the center, "[The woman] has occasional abdominal pain but is not getting any treatment. She intends to declare bankruptcy because she cannot pay the $47,000 she owes in medical bills, but so far has been unable to save the funds needed to pay for a bankruptcy filing."

People caught in this kind of squeeze often find themselves "sicker, much poorer, or both," said Robert Greenstein, the center's director.

It seems extremely strange that in the United States of America, the richest, most powerful nation in the history of the world, we are going backward in the 21st century in our ability to provide the most fundamental kinds of health care to ordinary people, including children.

The health insurance cutbacks would have been even worse if not for the $20 billion in emergency state aid that was reluctantly approved by the Bush administration and the Republican-led Congress last year. Despite the economic upturn, states are still struggling. They face a collective budget deficit of $40 billion to $50 billion for the coming fiscal year, and there is little sentiment among Republican leaders in Washington for another round of fiscal relief.

Maybe the nation itself needs a doctor. Shoving low-income people, including children, off the health care rolls at a time when the economy is allegedly booming is a sure sign of some kind of sickness in the society.  


Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company | Home | Privacy Policy | Search | Corrections | Help | Back to Top


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to