Keith, I think you have it right, though I must admit to not being a cosmologist.
 
Ed
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ricardo,CavemanTrade vs. Modern Trade

Ed,

At 08:22 13/01/2004 -0500, you wrote:
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:st1 = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags">
Harry, I guess prices have not come down because the money supply has increased more rapidly than productivity.  The English language has proven enormously flexible.  Get used to it.  If we want to call rising prices "inflation", we can, though we know that the root cause is an increase in the volume of money and credit in relation to available goods.  BTW, cosmologist also use the term to describe what happened to the universe immediately after the big bang.

Treading lightly in an area I don't know much about, but I think cosmologists reserve inflation for a second acceleration of the original bang a few milliseconds/minutes later. (I'm not so sure that I believe in either of these actually!)

Keith


Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: Harry Pollard
To: 'Ed Weick' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:47 AM
Subject: RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ricardo,CavemanTrade vs. Modern Trade

Ed,



 
Depends on what you mean by inflation.



 
To repeat, inflation is a physical term meaning an increase in volume. It was fine to use it with respect to an increase in the volume of money. So, inflation (and deflation) were good words to use to describe changes in the volume of money.



 
One of the effects of increasing the volume of money (the measure of value) is an increase in prices. Apparently economists transferred the name �inflation� from the cause to the effect.



 
Then they had a problem. Other things can cause a price increase � so prefixes arrived � such as �oil inflation� and �energy inflation�. (Using inflation is both senses, perhaps there could be �inflation inflation�.)



 
You ask if I believe that there is no such thing as inflation. In my sense (an increasing money supply), there always has been, albeit a rare excursion into deflation.



 
If you are asking me whether I think there has been a continual increase in prices, then I must assert categorically there has been.



 
But, then I wonder. Productivity goes up all the time. That should lead to lower prices. Why doesn�t it?



 
Well, it must be the exorbitant profits of the corporations and the extortionate demands of the unions. But, don�t worry, the guvmint will fight inflation on our behalf. (Remember Ford�s ridiculous �Win Inflation Now� � WIN.)



 
And there is the problem. The original meaning of inflation made it a government mistake. The segue to a  meaningless meaning has made it the fault of others.



 
No wonder economics is in such a mess.



 
Harry



 
********************************************
Henry George School of Social Science
of Los Angeles
Box 655  Tujunga  CA  91042
Tel: 818 352-4141  --  Fax: 818 353-2242
http://haledward.home.comcast.net
********************************************


From: Ed Weick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 5:54 AM
To: Harry Pollard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ricardo,CavemanTrade vs. Modern Trade



 
Harry, are you saying that there is no such thing as inflation and that it does not have economic effects?



 
Ed

----- Original Message -----

From: Harry Pollard

To: 'Ed Weick' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:51 AM

Subject: RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ricardo,CavemanTrade vs. Modern Trade



 
Ed,



 
Inflation has been taken over by the economics profession. In that sense  - because they use it � it is an economic term.



 
What does it mean?



 
Harry



 
********************************************
Henry George School of Social Science
of Los Angeles
Box 655  Tujunga  CA  91042
Tel: 818 352-4141  --  Fax: 818 353-2242
http://haledward.home.comcast.net
********************************************


From: Ed Weick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 4:08 PM
To: Harry Pollard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ricardo, CavemanTrade vs. Modern Trade



 
Harry, old friend, inflation really is an economic term, and has been since at least the twentieth century.



 
Ed

----- Original Message -----

From: Harry Pollard

To: 'Ed Weick' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 2:40 PM

Subject: RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ricardo, CavemanTrade vs. Modern Trade



 
Ed,



 
As I asked Arthur, if your boss offered to double your salary and quadruple the manager�s salary, would you refuse on the grounds you wanted the quadruple too?



 
I doubt it � and I doubt anyone else would either (unless they had a special agenda).



 
But, you bring in �inflation�.  Oh, my!



 
And we have barely finished the discussion of the non-economic term �profits�.



 
Inflation is not (shouldn�t be) an economic term. It�s a physical term meaning an increase in volume. When it referred to an expansion in volume of the money supply, it had some credibility.



 
However, one of the effects of increasing the volume of money is that its value decreases � as you would expect. So, more of it is needed to buy something, which is another way of saying prices increase.



 
(A price is the value of something in terms of the standard of value. Sorry, but these days, every word needs to be explained.)



 
So, the clowns who dictate modern economics took an effect of the increase in volume and called it inflation. Thus any general price increase is called inflation. As price increases may have many reasons, �inflation� tends to get prefixes. Thus, we get �oil inflation� and �coffee inflation� and my golly, �coffee deflation�. That means coffee prices are dropping, but �deflation� sounds so much more scientific.



 
So, Ed old friend, you introduce inflation out of the blue. Or, perhaps you expect the volume of �the measure of value� to increase because that is economic policy. As it becomes harder to keep the economy moving, there is greater temptation to inflate, to decrease the value of the dollar. So inflation becomes the norm. (This deserves more attention than I can give it � but evidence is immense that inflation is used to keep the economy going. That�s the original meaning, which is what I use. In fact, a recent history of British money showed that a (decimal) penny in 1850 would buy almost 20% more than today�s pound. (One of the arguments for the last increase in the US minimum wage was that it was worth about a third less than when it was instituted.)



 
So, inflation is a monetary phenomenon and describes an increase in the volume of the measure of value. Using it to describe an increase in prices not only makes it a useless word � it also squelches any attempt to examine the problem � so they don�t.



 
Harry



 


 

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.558 / Virus Database: 350 - Release Date: 1/2/2004

Keith Hudson, Bath, England, <www.evolutionary-economics.org>
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to