Here is Krugman’s take on the O’Neill disclosures and premature regime change problem that the Bush2 administration[snip]
I like that word "Bush2". I can't put my finger on it, but there was once a product that had a version, and a "2" version, and the "2" version was a scaled-down model (was it the Mustang II? Bush is a mustang, after all, isn't he?...).
O'Neil comes across as a "classy" person. That doesn't make him either right or virtuous, but it does contrast with what he has apparently figured out he sullied himself by association with -- and not *only* Bush2-ipsissimus, either.
O'Neil presmuably felt he needed to take a bath when one was offered. But you can't fault him for having stuck it out and giving his all. O'Neil didn't go AWOL like his Commander in Chief: he was discharged. I don't seem to detect a sneer in his mouth's corners like in Cheney's, either - not to mention Rumsfield's bemusement as the fate of our detainees at Gitmo....
Krugman is everything any capitalist could reasonably wish for, but, like FDR before him, some are not savvy enough about their own interests to realize you have to give a little to keep a lot.
\brad mccormick
--
Let your light so shine before men,
that they may see your good works.... (Matt 5:16)Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thes 5:21)
<![%THINK;[SGML+APL]]> Brad McCormick, Ed.D. / [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------------------------------------------- Visit my website ==> http://www.users.cloud9.net/~bradmcc/
_______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
