This is how your southern neighbors are reading about this historic example of the value of one vote. I must say I’m impressed with the ability of the confidence vote process to whip a national leader(ship) into listening to constituents. Do lobbyists run your country, too? It seems that the threat of ‘early dismissal’ works better than a corrupt president knowing the only way he’ll be impeached is to do something really wrong and leave evidence of it. The four year term in our process leaves a lot of time for mischief and incompetence. I’ve advocated in the past for a single six year term. - KwC

 

A Tie-Breaking Vote Saves Liberal Leader in Canada

By CLIFFORD KRAUSS, NYT, International, May 20, 2005

 

TORONTO, May 19 - Prime Minister Paul Martin and his Liberal government survived on Thursday evening by a single vote in the House of Commons after limping for months as a result of a party scandal.  While the victory in the deeply divided legislature will avert an immediate election, it probably will mean only a brief respite for Mr. Martin from the continuous political troubles that have shaken his ability to improve security and trade relations with the United States and infused new oxygen into the separatist movement in Quebec.

 

The showdown was decided by two of three independent lawmakers who decided to vote with the government on a budget measure, resulting in a 152-152 tie that was broken by Speaker Peter Milliken, a Liberal.

 

The prime minister tried to cast his close call in the best light. "We must move forward now in the spirit of cooperation," he told Parliament immediately after the vote. "We ask the opposition to join with us in a new effort to make this Parliament work for the people of Canada."

 

The clear loser was Stephen Harper, the leader of the Conservative Party, who tried to overthrow the Liberals in alliance with the separatist Bloc Qu�b�cois. But he promised to stay on the attack. "Tonight the Liberals won a Pyrrhic victory, one that will sow the seeds of its own destruction, one that will present our party with great opportunity," Mr. Harper said. Switching to French, he added, "I'm embarrassed and I deeply regret that our Parliament has decided this evening to maintain its confidence in a corrupt party."

 

The vote was forced by an opposition angered by a Liberal Party scandal. Testimony in a federal inquiry indicated that Liberal functionaries used advertising companies in a kickback and money laundering scheme to fill party coffers in the 1990's while Mr. Martin was finance minister. The advertising and sponsorship campaign was aimed at increasing federal government exposure in Quebec to thwart separatists.

 

Though Mr. Martin has insisted that he knew nothing about the suspected illicit campaign financing, he has been kept off-balance and weak since he took power in late 2003. To survive, he has been forced to veer left to secure the base of his party and win support from a smaller leftist party, forcing him in recent months to raise social spending and to abandon his pledge to join President Bush's missile defense program.

 

The confidence vote was the climax to weeks of heated exchanges, parliamentary filibustering and the specter of constitutional crisis.  The spectacle on the floor of House of Commons of members accusing one another of covering up criminal acts and questioning their patriotism served to elevate voter cynicism and rattle the Canadian dollar.

 

Mr. Martin has struggled since taking power almost two years ago to develop a consistent set of policies and focused objectives. But he showed more creativity in his efforts to survive. He rewrote his budget, adding billions in social spending to attract 19 votes of the social democratic New Democratic Party. Then he directly appealed to Canadians on national television by apologizing for the scandal and pleading for patience. He said that he would call an election soon after the investigating commission completed its work at the end of the year and that it would be wrong for voters to jump to conclusions before they weighed all the evidence.

 

Polls showed that his pitch was effective in persuading people to wait a few more months before rejecting his government. Many also appeared persuaded that they could have better roads and bridges, more day care services, cleaner air and water and more housing for the homeless if the Liberals had a chance to pass their budget before an election was held.

 

Nevertheless, the government appeared doomed to fall until Tuesday when Belinda Stronach, a leading moderate member of the Conservative Party, defected to the Liberals in return for a cabinet seat.  She said that she was uncomfortable with Conservative social and environmental positions, and that she thought her party had made a dangerous alliance with the Bloc Qu�b�cois that might not only overthrow the government but also threaten the unity of the country.

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/20/international/americas/20canada.html?

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to