Good to hear from you, Salvador, and good points.
 
Regards, Ed
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Intelligence

I agree. Sometimes you find intelligence where you do not expect to find it. In poor countries, like Mexico, I guess it is even more difficult for a bright mind to find his way, in an environment of ignorance and lack of educational opportunities.
But I have to say that the opposite can be true: sometimes you find a very noticeable lack of intelligence in persons whose responsibilities would make you expect something better. Stupid (I am not sure if this word in English has the same sense than in Spanish but I mean lack of intelligence combined with arrogance) people taking important decisions. Day after day I am more convinced that in companies, even big multinational companies, you do not have to be particularly intelligent to have a well paid job. Nor in the public sector. Even more, you do not have behave like an intelligent person to be keep your job as a president of a nation (no need to personalize; examples abound this days).
Salvador     
----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Weick
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 9:58 AM
Subject: [Futurework] Intelligence

I've been roaming around my long ago "Sent" files.  The one's on my hardrive go back to 2000.  Intelligence, in whatever form it takes or whatever its significance, often appears in discussions on the Futurework list.  So here is something I sent out to some friends on December 15th, 2000.  If you remember reading it then, just delete it, but do allow yourself a twinge of pride for having a very excellent memmory.
 
Ed

I don't know how many of you watch the program "The Fifth Estate", but there was something on it a few weeks ago which I simply can't get out of my head.  It had to do with the smartest people, though not necessarily the cleverest, in the US; that is, the people who registered the highest IQ scores when they were kids.  The very highest was not, as one might expect, a prof at Harvard or Stanford, but a muscle bound middle aged bouncer who worked at a night club for $6,000 a year.  When he was a kid, his IQ was recorded at something over 195 (100 is average), higher than Einstein's.  Apparently, he never did anything academic.  He came from a very poor family in Minnesota or North Dakota and had to quit school at a very early age.  But true to his innate talents, when he is not bouncing he, is working on a book on the relationship between the human personality and the universe.  He has a girlfriend who has a Ph.D. in something very essoteric.
 
There was another guy on the program whose IQ was nearly as high - e.g. 190+.  He was a middle aged biker, complete with Harley, leathers and long flowing blond hair.  He is something of a cult figure among his fellow bikers because he is very good at figuring things out.  Like the bouncer, he too came from a poor background and never did anything academic.
 
All of which leads to my point.  Since seeing the program, I've been thinking about some of the smartest people I've known.  I won't include my family and friends, who I know are severely, perhaps even tragically, gifted, so I don't have to say anything about them.  I just want to talk about people outside of my immediate circle.  So here is my list:
 
Albert Peter, a Yukon Indian from Mayo, about thirty when I worked with him, a very nice and ordinary guy, slight of build, a man you would ignore on the street.  When I worked with the Yukon Indians in the late 1980s and early 1990s, many of our meetings got extremely muddled.  We couldn't figure out where we had come from or where we were heading and sat there bickering over silly little points.  Finally, Albert, who had sat there in silence all the while, would get up, walk over to the white board, pick up a marker, and draw a diagram.  He would say something like "This is where you started.  Here is where you are.  This is where you want to go."  He would do it in the most friendly and non-critical way possible and was right every time.  Every time!  He would then humbly sit down, the meeting would continue for a little while, we would get to the point he said we would get to, and we would have agreement.  That he was an organizational genius of some kind was unquestionable.  He had no academic training apart from a couple of courses on aircraft maintenance, but he had been raised by his grandfather, a highly regarded medicine person.
 
Hank Neufeld, a kid from remote northern Alberta, who worked in the sawmill at Ocean Falls, B.C., for a time.  Hank had a bad leg and would limp quite noticeably.  He never went to university and probably never even finished High School, but he had memorized the whole of Shakespeare.  He knew every line of every play and every line of every sonnet.  During our lunch breaks, he would quote from various plays for half an hour at a time, explaining little nuances to us - like why Shakespeare put it this way and not that, and what he may have meant by it and how it would have been received in Elizabethan times.  He should have been lecturing at UBC or Harvard and not in a sawmill in Ocean Falls.  But with no credentials except his rather profound brain, that is where he was, in a sawmill in an out-of-the-way place.  And we all suspect that it's credentials, not brains, that matter.
 
A hotel clerk in New Delhi, India.  Mrs. Gandhi had just been assassinated, all hell had broken loose, and Europeans and North Americans wanted to get out, fast!  Milling about the hotel reception desk, they were all trying to convert their rupees into their domestic currencies and pay their accounts.  The clerk was accommodating them - keeping order, adding up accounts, converting currencies, making change, all in his head without putting pen or pencil to paper!  Very few people realized what he was doing, but those of us who did simply stood back and marveled, realizing that we were seeing something of the ultimate of human capacity! 
 
So, this is my paean to genius.  It is where you find it, and that is not necessarily where you expect to.
 
Ed
 



_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to