Brad,

I suggested a dozen of the incarcerated to show the
widespread evil of the Bush Presidency and the Homeland
Security stuff.

You came up with one who is scarcely unknown - heck he was a
TIME Person of the Week.

Actually, the Patriot Act doesn't apply to him because he's
an American citizen. So, what do we do with him?

We know he wanted - and got - training in dirty bomb making.
He went to Al Qaeda rather than the reverse. Of course they
weren't going to do much with him. He might have been a
double agent. So they sent him back where the FBI promptly
snagged him.

Back in the old days (I'm sure it has been changed for the
worse) if there was trouble on an English street a British
Bobby would arrest the miscreants for "behavior whereby a
breach of the peace might be occasioned". Quaint but
effective.

They would be taken back to the station, left to cool their
heels for a while and then released. The trouble would be
de-fused, no charge would be filed, and things would return
to normal.

In a sense, this is what has been done with Jose. At the
moment he can do no harm to anyone.  There appears to be no
doubt about his attempted Al Qaeda connections - or his
training. If he is released, he would probably have to be
kept under surveillance, for he appears to want to kill
Americans.

That's an expensive operation, perhaps requiring as many as
a dozen FBI people to mount round the clock stakeouts. Of
course, keeping him boarded is expensive too.

Maybe he should have been shot while trying to escape.

Anyway, they devise legalistics (there's a coin) to keep him
where they can see him. He is of no use to us for I'm sure
he knows nothing of importance about terrorists of any
description.

Can you suggest a better way to handle the problem?

I'll let you off finding eleven more people whose rights
have been abrogated by the Bush regime. In any event, the
FBI and the police already know how to do their thing - you
no doubt remember Hatfield - but perhaps we shouldn't worry
too much about any general infringement of our liberties.

Not yet.

Harry
*******************************
Henry George School of Social Science
of Los Angeles
Box 655  Tujunga  CA 91042
818 352-4141
*******************************
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brad McCormick, Ed.D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 4:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Karen Watters Cole'; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Futurework] The most profitable consumer goods
yet (prayers?)

Harry Pollard wrote:

>Brad,
>
>I think the long list of Americans who have been
>incarcerated without due process should be publicized.
>  
>
Gee! I'm flattered to be given this assignment, but I
can't remember how I earned it.

So I'll do what I can to contribute, quoting
from Information Clearing House (today's newsletter):

  Charge Him or Release Him

  Jose Padilla : U.S. Citizen Imprisoned 
  Without Trial or Charges for 3 Years and 19 Days


Here's another quote from ICH, which I
would argue shows the problematicity of
general principles:


  "Individuals have international duties which 
  transcend the national obligations of obedience.
  therefore [individual citizens] have the duty 
  to violate domestic laws to prevent crimes 
  against peace and humanity from occurring." 
  - Nuremberg War Crime Tribunal, 1950

Now all of us know that George W Bush and all the
advocati foeti would completely agree with
this statement -- even though some of us
would not agree with them in our agreeing
with the same statement.


It doesn't need citation (read Friedman in the NYT today)
that Guantanimo is becoming an avatar of Gulag. 500
souls held incommunicado and without being
charged with any crime, just because Rumsfield thinks
it's a good idea to keep them out of circulation. Rumsfeld
has explicitly said that the American people don't
understand
the new demands of new challenges: the American
people still think that persons detained should be charged
with a crime and tried for it and found
guilty and punished, or else be released. That,
according to Rumsfeld, is no longer the way to do things.
And he even smirks to drive his point "home".

I have not been keeping a "log" of those detained without
being charged. One -- yes, all of 1! -- American citizen
did get released from military detention a few months ago,
but the reason appears basically to have been to keep his
case from actually coming before The Supreme court
[I can't find him in my files at the moment -- my indexing
techniques are not good enough!].

So, this Memorial Day, let us remember all the
"disappeareds"
of all times and nations, including those currently in
the American Lubyanka (it doesn't have a name
and it doesn't have a fixed physical domicilage -- it's
"virtual" so to speak...)

And, lest someone snap back at me: "The United States isn't
killing or torturing people at anywere near the level of
Hitler
or Stalin", I say: Are we to measure ourselves by the
standard
of persons and nations far less blessed than our own? Or
are we to demand:

 From those to whom much has been given
(e.g., 2/3 the world industrial capacity in 1945,
and the great mass of its top scientific PhDs, too --
an economy not decimated but vastly enhanced
by the war!),
Much should be expected.

I think it is also time to quote once again from Hermann
Broch,
who spoke of WWI Europe in terms that all too well
fit our own situation:

A community of life that has ceased to
justify its existence --
A so-called society devoid of force, but filled with
evil will, that drowns itself in blood and chokes on
its own poison gasses

Oh, yes, and "DU", too....

Perhaps we are living in The Last Days: Bush and his
fellow travellers being the Antichrist.

\brad mccormick

>Perhaps you could start with a dozen or so.
>
>Don't go back to Lyndon's infiltration of Viet-Nam war
>protest groups - just those over the last few years.
>
>Harry
>*******************************
>Henry George School of Social Science
>of Los Angeles
>Box 655  Tujunga  CA 91042
>818 352-4141
>*******************************


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to