"Damned liars", Pete.

*******************************
Henry George School of Social Science
of Los Angeles
Box 655  Tujunga  CA 91042
818 352-4141
*******************************
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:futurework-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of pete
> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 4:03 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Futurework] FW: class consumerism
> 
> 
> On Mon, 30 May 2005, "Cordell, Arthur: ECOM"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> quoted:
> 
> >NY Times
> >
> >May 29, 2005
> >
> >When the Joneses Wear Jeans
> >
> >By
>
<http://query.nytimes.com/search/query?ppds=bylL&v1=JENNIFE
> R
> >STEINHAUER&fdq=19960101&td=sysdate&sort=newest&ac=JE
> NNIFER
> >STEINHAUER&inline=nyt-per> JENNIFER STEINHAUER
> >
> 
> [...]
> 
> >Even where luxury-good prices have remained forbiddingly
high,
> some
> >manufacturers have come up with strategies to cast more
widely
> for
> >customers, looking to middle-class consumers, whose
incomes
> have
> >generally risen in recent years; the median family income
in the
> United
> >States grew 17.6 percent from 1983 to 2003, when adjusted
for
> inflation.
> 
> Hmmm. These numbers seem to be directly at odds with some
> others which
> have gone by recently, which have suggested that incomes
of the
> lower 80%
> of americans have lost ground against inflation, while the
> increasing
> incomes of the top 20% have overwhelmed this trend to
yield a
> rising
> average. But this latter characterization would result in
a dropping
> median, contrary to this report. I wonder who is in error
here, or
> if some sort of glib manipulation of statistics is at work
on one side
> or the other.
> 
>  -Pete



_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to