|
The Cry Wolf
warning was issued and promptly ignored. This is what you get when zealots
believe their own publicity campaigns and citizens forget to be skeptical and
demand answers. When the spell is broken, it’s not a happy Hollywood ending,
for anyone. KwC Two Top Guns Shoot Blanks
By Frank Rich, NYT,
Sunday, June 19, 2005 To understand how the Bush administration has lost the
public opinion war on Iraq it may be helpful to travel in H. G. Wells's time
machine back to Oct. 30, 1938. That was the Sunday night that Orson Welles staged the
mother of all fake news events: his legendary radio adaptation of another Wells
fantasy, "The War of the Worlds." The audience was told four times
during the hourlong show that it was fiction, but to no avail. A month after
Munich, Americans afflicted with war jitters were determined to believe the
broadcast's phony news flashes that Martians had invaded New Jersey. Mobs fled
their homes in a "wave of mass hysteria," as The New York Times
described it on Page 1, clogging roads and communications systems. Two days
later, in an editorial titled "Terror by Radio," The Times darkly
observed that "what began as 'entertainment' might readily have ended in
disaster" and warned radio officials to mind their "adult
responsibilities" and think twice before again mingling "news
technique with fiction so terrifying." That's one Times editorial, it can be said without
equivocation, that didn't make a dent. Nearly seven decades later the mingling
of news and fiction has become the default setting of American infotainment,
and Americans have become so inured to it that the innocent radio listeners
bamboozled by Welles might as well belong to another civilization. Nowhere is
the distance between that America and our own more visible than in the hoopla
surrounding the latest adaptation of "The War of the Worlds," the
much-awaited Steven Spielberg movie opening June 29. Like its broadcast predecessor, the new version has already
proved to be a launching pad for an onslaught of suspect news bulletins. This
time the headlines are less earthshaking than an invasion from outer space, but
they are no less ubiquitous: in repeated public appearances, most famously on
"Oprah," the Spielberg movie's star, the 42-year-old Tom Cruise, has
fallen to his knees and jumped on couches to declare his undying love for the
26-year-old Katie Holmes, the co-star of another summer spectacular,
"Batman Begins." Forget about those bygone Hollywood studio schemes
to concoct publicity-generating off-screen romances for its stars-in-training.
Here is a lavishly produced freak show, designed to play out in real time,
enthusiastically enacted by the biggest star in the business. On Friday, after
popping the big question to Ms. Holmes at the Eiffel Tower, Mr. Cruise promptly
dragged his intended to a news conference. But though the audience for this drama is as large as, if
not larger than, that for Welles's, there's one big difference. The
Cruise-Holmes romance is proving less credible to Americans in 2005 than a
Martian invasion did to those of 1938. A People magazine poll found that 62
percent deem the story a stunt. To tabloid devotees, the reasons for Mr.
Cruise's credibility gap are the perennial unsubstantiated questions about his
sexuality and his very public affiliation with a church, Scientology, literally
founded by a science-fiction writer. But something bigger is going on here. The
subversion of reality that Welles slyly introduced into modern American media
in 1938 has reached its culmination and a jaded public is at last in open
revolt. The
boundary between reality and fiction has now been blurred to such an extent by
show business, the news business and government alike that almost no shows
produced by any of them are instantly accepted as truth. The market for fake news has become so
oversaturated that a skeptical public is finally dismissing most of it as hooey
until proven otherwise (unless it is labeled as fake news from the get-go, as
it is by Jon Stewart). We'll devour the supposedly real Cruise-Holmes liaison
for laughs but give it no more credence than a subplot on "Desperate
Housewives." Welles unwittingly set us on the path toward the utter
destabilization of reality with "War of the Worlds," and then
compounded the syndrome with his subsequent film masterpiece "Citizen
Kane," a fictional biography of a thinly disguised William Randolph Hearst
that invented the pseudo-journalistic docudrama. But it's only in the past few
years that Welles's ideas have been taken completely over the top by his trashy
heirs. Not only do we have TV movies bastardizing the history of celebrities
living and dead, but there is also a steady parade of "real"
celebrities playing themselves in their own fictionalized "reality"
shows. (This summer alone, Bobby Brown, Mötley Crüe's Tommy Lee, Hugh Hefner's
girlfriends and Paris Hilton's mother are all getting their own series.) The
Cruise-Holmes antics, not to mention the concurrent shenanigans of Brad Pitt
and Angelina Jolie, add yet another variant to this mix, shrewdly identified by
Patrick Goldstein
of The Los Angeles Times as "a new rogue genre in which celebrities
act out their own reality show, free from the constraints of a network time
slot or a staged setting, like a boardroom or a desert island." Politicians
who dive into this game by putting on their own reality shows think they are
being very clever.
But like Mr. Cruise, they're being busted by a backlash. John Kerry was the
first to feel it: his stagy military pageant, complete with salute, at the
Democratic National Convention came off as so phony tha t the greater (but more subtle)
fictions of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth struck many as relatively real by
comparison. George W. Bush proved a somewhat more accomplished performer - in
his first term. With the help of Colin Powell and some nifty props, he
effortlessly sold the country on Saddam W.M.D.'s. He got away with using a
stunt turkey as the photo-op centerpiece during his surprise Thanksgiving 2003
visit to the troops in Iraq. His canned "Ask the President" campaign
town-hall meetings - at which any potentially hostile questioner was either
denied admittance or hustled out by goons - were slick enough to be paraded
before unsuspecting viewers as actual news on local TV outlets, in the
tradition of Welles's bogus "War of the Worlds" bulletins. But the
old magic is going kaput.
Mr. Bush's 60-stop Social Security "presidential roadshow," his
latest round of pre-scripted and heavily rehearsed faux town-hall meetings,
hasn't repeated the success of "Ask the President." Support for
private Social Security accounts actually declined as the tour played out and
Mr. Bush increasingly sounded as if he were protesting too much. "See, in
my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again
for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda," the
president said on May 24. He sounded as if he were channeling Mr. Cruise's desperate
repetitions of his love for his "terrific lady." The
shelf life of the fakery that sold the war has also expired. On June 7, a
Washington Post/ABC News poll found for the first time that a majority of
Americans believe the war in Iraq has not made the United States safer. A week
later Gallup found that a clear majority (59 percent) wants to withdraw some or
all American troops. Most Americans tell pollsters the war isn't "worth
it," and the top reasons they cite, said USA Today, include "fraudulent
claims and no weapons of mass destruction found" and "the belief that
Iraq posed no threat to the United States." The administration can keep boasting of the
Iraqi military's progress in taking over for Americans and keep maintaining
that, as Dick Cheney put it, the insurgency is in its "last throes."
But when even the conservative Republican congressman who pushed the House
cafeteria to rename French fries "freedom fries" (Walter B. Jones of
North Carolina) argues for withdrawal, it's fruitless. Once a story line becomes
incredible, it's hard to get the audience to fall for it again. This, too, echoes the history of the Welles hoax. Three
years after his "War of the Worlds," the real nightmare that America
feared did arrive. Yet some radio listeners at first thought that the reports
from Pearl Harbor were another ruse. Welles would later recall in an interview
with Peter Bogdanovich that days after the Japanese attack, Franklin Roosevelt
sent him a cable chiding him for having cried wolf with his faked war "news"
of 1938. Such is the overload of faked reality for Americans at this
point that it will be far more difficult for the Bush administration than it
was for F.D.R. to persuade the nation of an imminent threat without appearing
to cry wolf. Nor can it easily get the country to believe that success in Iraq
is just around the corner. Too many still remember that marvelous
aircraft-carrier spectacle marking the end of "major combat
operations" in Iraq - a
fake reality show adapted, no less, from a Tom Cruise classic, "Top Gun." Some 25 months and 1,500 American
deaths later, nothing short of a collaboration by Orson Welles and Steven
Spielberg could make this war fly in America now. Last week I misstated the Friday evening on which the
Pentagon buried its report certifying desecrations of the Koran by American
guards. It was June 3, not May 27. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/19/opinion/19rich.html? |
_______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
