|
Not all these tax
incentive schemes are planned and executed well. Many times the corporation has
pulled up, lock, stock and barrel, just before they were to begin paying taxes after
the grace period expired, leaving communities in debt for infrastructure
upgrades, job losses and the lost revenue. As with some
restrictions on Wal Mart’s rampant building programs, some municipalities are
learning to build in clauses that guarantee a penalty if the company leaves
early, or in the case of Wal Mart, they vacate the property too quickly. There is no
free lunch, they say, but municipalities have a real problem when corporations
take a Godzilla approach to the marketplace. If people realized that most
employment in their state, as well as nationally, came from small and medium
sized businesses, not the large corporations, they would be even more angry
about the giveaways and blackmail done in the name of economic development. Moreover, when
you have large national firms as your major employer/revenue, the bulk of their
monies go out of state to HQ. The multiplier
effect favors local, independent businesses. For every $1 spent with a local
business, it circulates 3 times at other local/regional businesses, instead of
being shipped out overnight to Arkansas, for instance. A local business almost
always has a local attorney, a local printer, a local CPA, a local insurance
agent, etc. and the owners pay local taxes and raise their kids there, so they
have a vested interest in the community’s long term sustainability. People are
also paying more attention to where they bank and buy their mortgages, weary of
the mega mergers and loss of identity. It may be a side effect of globalization
and the wonders of technology, but it also has something to do with pride of
place and community. Karen Arthur, It will do nothing to stop the race to the bottom – that’s built in to
Classical thinking and is observationally true. The mistake made of course to attribute it to one or the other
political configurations. Both sides use as their template a kind of Keynesian
attitude – let the privileges continue, but we’ll tax them. Then, (figuratively) those taxes are used to alleviate some of the
harmful effects of the privileges. Perhaps the left offers a greater
alleviation, but it also acts more nanny-like than the right. The thought of getting rid of privilege hardly appears to dent the
consciousness of either side – probably says my skeptical side – because they
are paid too well. You forget the good done by bribing companies to locate in your area.
The local landholders (probably on the local councils) do very well when a
company relocates. Then, this money is spent by them and keeps the economy
going. So, there is your neo-Classical lesson for today – which you really
didn’t need. Harry Maybe this will slow down the "race to the
bottom." Conservatives are doing something right. ------------------------------ Politics & Policy States
Pay Steep Price to Attract Industry --- Local Taxpayers, Small Businesses Bear
the Burden, Say a Growing Chorus of Critics
But the state's victory over rival "People are starting to see through the facade," says
Robert Orr, a retired state Supreme Court justice who runs the North Carolina
Institute for Constitutional Law, which filed the suit. "Incentives are
geared toward literally a handful of large, very wealthy and very powerful
corporations at the expense of the other businesses." Critics
have also taken aim at incentive programs in other states, including The
anti-incentive forces have been buoyed by a favorable decision in an States for years have been engaged in a kind of industrial arms
race to lure job-producing employers. But as incentive packages for
corporations have become costly, critics -- a philosophically diverse group of
free marketers, consumer advocates and former state officials -- have become
more organized and effective in pressing arguments that subsidies are wasteful
and, perhaps, illegal. In In Some
challenges are brought by companies unhappy that their competitors are getting
economic goodies. In late 2003 Northwest Airlines, of The debate over incentives also is taking place on a global scale.
As an outgrowth of the rivalry between Boeing Co. and Europe's Airbus, the Business
groups and state governments defend incentive packages as important tools for
spurring economic growth, and they are watching the DaimlerChrysler case in the
Supreme Court. If it upholds the lower court's ruling, they warn, that would be
devastating for development in An
anti-incentives decision by the high court would have broader implications as
well, potentially endangering incentives for projects such as factories and
sports stadiums across the country. An attack on incentives could encourage
states to shift to other financial inducements, such as direct cash grants. To
protect states' authority to set incentives, two Republican lawmakers from People
who oppose the Voinovich effort say that granting tax concessions to corporations
unfairly shifts the burden of funding services such as schools and roads to
individual taxpayers and small businesses. Greg Leroy, director of Good Jobs
First, a nonprofit economic-development research organization in In the case of Dell, the computer company threatened to move its
planned $100 million facility offshore if state officials didn't waive
corporate income taxes. When
North Carolina balked, Kip Thompson, a Dell vice president, told the state
commerce secretary: "If a state like N.C. can't get this, I'm worried for
our country -- there's a certain amount of patriotism here," according to
copies of handwritten notes released by the state. After Dell secured a state-incentive package, which included $225
million in income-tax credits over 15 years, it began seeking additional breaks
from municipalities. The city of Dell
spokesman David Frink said the company doesn't discuss its negotiations. " North
Carolina Republican State Sen. David Hoyle looks at it differently. "It's
out of control, like we're addicted and can't kick the habit," he said of
state incentives for corporations. "The perfect scenario would be if
incentives were outlawed nationally." Now, states have little choice but
to continue competing for new jobs, he said. Other Mr.
Gerlach, an economist, estimates the state will get $4 in new
economic-development revenue for every $1 in tax breaks awarded to Dell.
"This is a slam-dunk deal for --- Battling Tax Breaks Some recent court challenges to state tax incentives for businesses: STATE: DESCRIPTION: Suit filed last week challenging elements of a $280 million tax break for Dell. STATE: DESCRIPTION: Parts of a $280 million package for DaimlerChrysler ruled unconstitutional in September; case could reach STATE: DESCRIPTION: overturn state's job-creation incentive program. STATE: DESCRIPTION: Suit challenging economic incentives rendered moot when state passed a new program in May. STATE: DESCRIPTION: Northwest Airlines suit successfully challenged property tax breaks for rival airlines; state is appealing decision.
|
_______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
