This morning Pres. Bush actually said on Good Morning, America that “I don’t think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees.”  This prompted Dan Froomkin to write in his Daily White House briefing that this rare live interview “exposed one of the president's greatest weaknesses: He doesn't have the answers to some of the most important questions”.  Further, he’s flat wrong. His lame statement contradicts not just FEMA and the US Army Corps of Engineers but also the Scientific American, National Geographic, local emergency personnel and newspaper who covered the budget cuts to flood control and engineering projects in the Gulf, specifically New Orleans.

 

There is a clear track record since the first Bush cuts in April 2001, when then Budget Director Mitch Daniels indicated FEMA would be downsized. It was folded into the department of Homeland Security in March 2003 and by summer 2004 funding requests for high priority projects were slashed, citing the need for war funds. Just 2 months ago, US COE funds for NO were cut by $72 MN.

 

By the way, this brings up the old question of “pork barrel” projects and how much we denigrate local politicians for them. I know Sen. Mary Landrieu was rebuffed this summer for requests for emergency funds, and Sen. Trent Lott has been accused of being a top achiever for home state projects. While I have no knowledge of her housing status, or claim that this is any retribution by God, other local pols from Louisiana and Mississippi, including Sen. Lott, lost their homes in Katrina’s wake.

 

I’ve seen reports that a Canadian rescue group was stopped at the BC border by Homeland Security and not allowed in the US. Can anyone confirm that?

 

Below are several editorials from the many today questioning the federal gov’t/ Bush administration actions and inaction. For those of you who don’t receive their newsletter or bookmark the website, here is Center for American Progress’ collection on Bush and Katrina, Day 3.

 

Bush values: Ask Not

Speaking to a nation that was in the midst of confronting monumental challenges such as poverty and war, Pres. John F. Kennedy said in his 1961 inaugural address, "My fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you -- ask what you can do for your country ... ask of us here the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you." Speaking from the Rose Garden to a nation that is simultaneously fighting a war and dealing with perhaps the greatest natural disaster in U.S. history, Pres. George W. Bush failed to issue any such call for sacrifice. The New York Times writes in an editorial, "Sacrifices may be necessary to make sure that all these things happen in an orderly, efficient way. But this administration has never been one to counsel sacrifice."

Bush could sacrifice Tax Cuts for the wealthy:
 Marshall Loeb, editor of Money and Fortune magazines, writes, "
The President could show that he, too, is prepared to sacrifice for Katrina's victims, perhaps by rolling back some of his planned tax cuts. The nation can ill afford to pay for a war, tax reductions and this disaster recovery at the same time."  But Bush has given no indications he will back off his ideological agenda of more tax cuts which primarily benefit the wealthy. Pete Peterson, former secretary of Commerce under Nixon, wrote, "After 9/11, [the administration] faced a choice between tax cuts and getting serious about the extensive measures needed to protect this nation against further terrorist attacks. They chose tax cuts." And again, as the Iraq war commenced, Bush faced a similar choice. But catering to the arguments of conservative ideologues like Tom DeLay, who argued, "Nothing is more important in the face of a war than cutting taxes," Bush again failed to call for sacrifice and instead chose tax cuts. Despite the devastating economic impact of Katrina, conservatives are already positioning themselves for a vote next Tuesday on the next priority item: repealing the estate tax -- a tax paid by the wealthiest one percent of Americans who inherit at least $1.5 million. 

Bush could call for conservation: 
The president of American Petroleum Institute, Red Cavaney, said, "The impact of this devastating storm on oil and natural gas operations will be significant and protracted.... Let us understand:
This is not an easy thing." His solution? "Right now would be a good time for everybody to sort of ramp up your energy conservation," Cavaney said, even offering energy-saving tips which could help increase fuel efficiency. AAA is also urging motorists to drive less and conserve fuel. President Bush had an opportunity yesterday to publicly elevate the need for energy conservation, but failed to make the call for sacrifice. Bush implored citizens to "understand this storm has disrupted the capacity to make gasoline and distribute gasoline" but offered no suggestions as to how Americans should cope with the crisis.  He should take his cue from Gov. Mike Easley of North Carolina, who said recently, "I am asking all North Carolinians to conserve gas."

 

If you ask, they will respond: Shortly after the attacks of 9/11, Sen. John McCain complained, "After 9/11, people wanted to serve and they were told to go shopping or get on an airplane.... That's not the answer they wanted to hear. This is an opportunity to serve." Americans have demonstrated time and again that, in the face of tragedy, they will respond with true compassion. Already, the Red Cross has announced that it has collected $21 million in donations for the victims of Katrina, "a figure comparable to the response for tsunami victims following the devastation in Asia earlier this year." "The outpouring of support has been amazing," said Kara Bunte, a spokeswoman for the Red Cross. "People are now starting to see the images on TV and want to help." Americans also responded with amazing compassion in the two months following 9/11, providing approximately 1.6 million blood donations and contributing over $1.3 million to charities and relief agencies. Americans can and will do more to sacrifice; they simply need a president who will ask.

 

Further, it would be timely to organize a work program to employ all those newly homeless and unemployed in projects such as those that FDR deployed during the depression, to give meaningful work to desperate people. Again, this would take some vision that Bush seems precariously lacking, given his proverbial reliance on privatization. kwc

 

NYT ED 090105: Waiting for a leader: “George W. Bush gave one of the worst speeches of his life yesterday, especially given the level of national distress and the need for words of consolation and wisdom. In what seems to be a ritual in this administration, the president appeared a day later than he was needed. He then read an address of a quality more appropriate for an Arbor Day celebration: a long laundry list of pounds of ice, generators and blankets delivered to the stricken Gulf Coast. He advised the public that anybody who wanted to help should send cash, grinned, and promised that everything would work out in the end…It would be some comfort to think that, as Mr. Bush cheerily announced, America "will be a stronger place" for enduring this crisis. omplacency will no longer suffice, especially if experts are right in warning that global warming may increase the intensity of future hurricanes. But since this administration won't acknowledge that global warming exists, the chances of leadership seem minimal.http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/01/opinion/01thu1.html

 

Orlando Sentinel ED: After Katrina “…natural disasters aren't unique to Florida. To protect all Americans, Congress should revisit federal regulation of the insurance industry, and explore the feasibility of setting up a federal reinsurance fund for natural disasters.  Hurricanes may be unpredictable beasts. But unlike earthquakes, tornadoes or wildfires, major storms arrive with plenty of advance warning, courtesy of the Miami-based National Hurricane Center. The value of coordinated emergency planning cannot be underestimated. Nor can the importance of a coordinated emergency response. More important, citizens must heed the directives of emergency personnel and community leaders. Too often, false bravado, anxiety and apathy result in a needless loss of life. http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/opinion/orl-ed31105aug31,0,4995558.story?coll=orl-opinion-headlines

 

WP ED 090105: The Great Flood of ’05: “This administration has consistently played down the possibility of environmental disaster, in Louisiana and everywhere else. The president's most recent budgets have actually proposed reducing funding for flood prevention in the New Orleans area, and the administration has long ignored Louisiana politicians' requests for more help in protecting their fragile coast, the destruction of which meant there was little to slow down the hurricane before it hit the city. It is inappropriate to "blame" anyone for a natural disaster. But given how frequently the impact of this one was predicted, and given the scale of the economic and human catastrophe that has resulted, it is certainly fair to ask questions about disaster preparations. Congress, when it returns, should rise above the blame game and instead probe the state of the nation's preparation for handling major natural catastrophes, particularly those that threaten crucial regions of the country”.  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/31/AR2005083102256.html

 

(one of the most conservative papers in the US) Union Leader (NH) ED Bush and Katrina: a time for action, not aloofness

As the extent of Katrina’s devastation became clearer Tuesday — millions without power, tens of thousands homeless, a death toll unknowable because rescue crews can’t reach some regions — Pres. Bush carried on with his plans to speak in San Diego, as if nothing important had happened the day before… A better leader would have flown straight to the disaster zone and announced the immediate mobilization of every available resource to rescue the stranded, find and bury the dead, and keep the survivors fed, clothed, sheltered and free of disease. The cool, confident, intuitive leadership Bush exhibited in his first term, particularly in the months immediately following Sept. 11, 2001, has vanished. In its place is a diffident detachment unsuitable for the leader of a nation facing war, natural disaster and economic uncertainty. Wherever the old George W. Bush went, we sure wish we had him back. 

http://www.theunionleader.com/articles_showa.html?article=59785

 

Related Reading:

Louisiana’s Times-Picayne reporting on hurricane disaster potential in New Orleans and the budget cuts since 2003 that hampered preparations.  http://www.nola.com/hurricane/?/washingaway/

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to