Hi Karen,
 
Do you know, Was the Davis-Bacon Act one that was to pertain to the devastated states only, or was it to include and affect the entire nation? I realize it was designed to offset federal expenditure in rebuilding N.O. region, not to mention the required and too familiar slap in the face to the poor and unemployed.
 
If displaced private school kids' relocation is Bush's most important priority in this disaster, I suspect that Jeb is going to benefit in some big way. After all, he has rights to a string of these private schools, and I'm sure that's where we'll see the money go. But it speaks clearly for the case against the President's capacity to lead. As if there wasn't enough to wonder at.
 
Spending relief funds wisely may require the resurfacing of Paul Bremer. He's probably already gone through the billions he bilked from the Iraq reconstruction projects funds funded by the Iraqis, and the few more he got from Monsanto for dispossessing the poor Iraqi farmers from owning their centuries developed crop seeds. And he's a war hero, like North.
 
Thanks for all of your postings,
Natalia
 
All mail scanned by NAV
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 7:46 AM
Subject: [Futurework] Politicizing Katrina

One of the most infuriating aspects of this White House has been their hypocritical pattern of politicizing events while self-righteously wagging fingers at anyone else, warning them not to do the same.

 

The Heritage Foundation was responsible for the portion of Pres. Bush’s New Orleans ‘save my presidency’ speech regarding a Gulf Opportunity Zone. It mentioned several favorite conservative Christmas wish items: vouchers for private schools, relaxing regulations such as prevailing wages on contracts, in addition to environmental safeguards. And the big prize: a flat tax imposed on the GOP version of utopia, a military-patrolled deregulated corporate republic.

 

For example, what was the first executive action the President took after Katrina? He immediately waved the wage requirements for federal contracts in the Davis-Bacon Act. This was done before all the evacuees had been moved out. Now he’s proposing “nearly $500 million in federal funding to help displaced private school students from the Gulf Coast enroll in private schools elsewhere in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.  The proposal, fleshing out a goal President Bush had announced in a speech to the nation Thursday night, would amount to the largest federal school voucher program ever, if enacted.”

 

As to housing the displaced, some of you may know that some shelters have been set up in remote campgrounds, that although well-intentioned may function more like internment camps than facilities where people can interact with agencies and job opportunities. Another concern is the $500 million already spent on mobile homes and RVs to be set up in “Katrina towns”. Isn’t one of the lessons of disasters that mobile homes don’t fare well in hurricanes and tornados?

 

Already, fiscal conservatives, editorials and what’s left of the “opposition party” are screaming about the lack of details and the tendency to throw money at a problem. According to the latest NYT/CBS poll, 90% of people surveyed, “including a majority of Republicans, said they would disapprove of cutting expenditures on domestic programs, like education and health care, to continue paying for the Iraq war.” So there is a economic rebellion brewing, despite rosy rhetoric from the podium.

 

The best idea I’ve heard yet: sell reconstruction bonds instead of sending the deficit into Mar’s orbit, further shaking up our bankers in China and Japan.  As long as the POTUS keeps insisting that we can do ‘whatever it takes’ in Iraq, and “whatever it takes” rebuilding the Gulf Coast and still extend his tax cuts for the wealthy, one has to wonder what secret deals or funny money is going to make that work. Bush never had much luck in business himself and got friendly bailouts and “do-overs”. But we need sound policy, not Bushification.

 

This is an Alamo moment in US politics, drawing a line in the sand. The GOP will dominate the debate by virtue of their control over Congress, literally shutting out Democrats as they do on other controversial legislation. Some are ideologically driven to impose principles under the guise of reconstruction that they haven’t succeeded in legislating. Progressives and everyone who opposes further abuses of democratic balance of power needs to resist political opportunism instead of real opportunity. If Karl Rove is the de facto “czar” of this effort, the Gulf Coast recovery will officially launch a Republic of Halliburton with Grover Norquist officiating.  - KwC

 

Sources:

Americans worry about the $5 Billion per month spending in Iraq as other debt accumulates http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/17/politics/17poll.html

Analysts discuss Bush’s speech/plans to rebuild Gulf coast region: Heritage vs Brookings, Green Local First vs Wal Martization http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/weather/july-dec05/rebuild_9-16.html

Brooks and Oliphant: Bush between a rock and a hard place Best idea I’ve heard yet: sell reconstruction bonds  http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/political_wrap/july-dec05/bo_9-16.html

Bush proposes private school vouchers http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/16/AR2005091601723.html

Economists, housing experts question proposals http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/15/AR2005091502664.html?

Separate but equal? Schooling of evacuees provokes debate http://online.wsj.com/public/article/0,,SB112666498176540100-DQgawuLyt4mP5qjjI_nsJlY369A_20060914,00.html?mod=blogs

WaPo ED Mind the Money. “However the federal spending is paid for, the government must put in place a strong structure to oversee the effort. This is important not only to guard against fraud but to make certain that the money goes where it is most needed and is spent in a way that makes most sense, rather than where the loudest political clamor arises or where the administration's ideological predispositions dictate. There are already some worrisome signs. Instead of creating trailer towns of Katrina evacuees, for example, why not expand the federal government's voucher program -- a program the administration has repeatedly tried to cut -- to take advantage of the large numbers of vacant rental units? There are serious questions about whether Mr. Bush's proposed Gulf Opportunity Zone, which would grant tax breaks for business investment in equipment and buildings in the affected areas, would merely subsidize investment that would have happened anyway or draw it from elsewhere.” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/16/AR2005091601634.html

 

 

 

 


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to