The US House of Representatives is expected to pass legislation Friday that provides new tax breaks for new refineries to be built and would weaken protections against air and water pollution to save those same refineries more money at the expense of the public’s health.  With record profits, it doesn’t seem necessary to give them either tax breaks or cheaper ways to build at the public’s expense.

 

Since the industry hasn’t been banned from building, their reason for no new construction has been that it would not be profitable, just as the major oil and gas companies have not increased drilling aggressively in the face of growing demand because they don’t find the geological evidence sufficient to do so and are now diversifying into renewable energy sources. Refinery capacity has decreased largely due to industry mergers, not external prohibitions.

 

In the rush to capitalize on public vulnerability to market scares, another target of the Katrina carpetbaggers is the ‘opt-out’ some states want for new offshore drilling and ‘opt-in’ for public financing.  Florida’s Representatives blocked California’s Pombo from including that in this legislation, but it will be back, probably in a budget omnibus bill that protects it from scrutiny.

 

By comparison, it should be noted that China, the emerging global giant energy consumer, is looking to California’s tighter controls, not an unrestricted, unregulated energy marketplace, to address its supply and demand burdens:

 

Last month, officials from the [California] Public Utilities Commission, the Energy Commission and Pacific Gas and Electric Co. signed a pact with Jiangsu province, a booming coastal region of 75 million people, and informal agreements with Shanghai province and the central government in Beijing, to provide expertise and training to Chinese regulators and utility companies.

 

Californian and Chinese officials said the agreements were important components in helping to fight China's abysmal air pollution, its surging need for energy -- which has helped drive up international prices for petroleum, natural gas and coal to record highs -- and its fast-growing output of the greenhouse gases that are linked to global warming.

 

"The Chinese realize they can't drill or mine their way out of their energy problem," said Susan Kennedy, a PUC commissioner who participated in the China talks. Kennedy said officials in Beijing, Shanghai and elsewhere were planning to adopt an approach, long used in California, known as "demand-side management," in which regulatory agencies and power companies use pricing mechanisms and subsidies to reduce energy consumption.

 

California's credibility among Chinese energy officials rests in large part on the success of the state's conservation and efficiency programs, including its application of demand-side management techniques to help resolve the state's energy crisis in 2001. Last month, state regulators went further, imposing tough new efficiency standards on everything from light bulbs to home air conditioners to power plants.

 

It is always cheaper and faster to conserve energy consumption than expand energy production.  Yet even after 9/11, the instability of OPEC geopolitics, war and natural disasters that have constricted our already overwhelmed capacity supply line, the Bush administration can only weakly suggest a few voluntary measures.  Whose interests do they represent?

 

It is deplorable that this administration is now being urged by the CEOs of Ford and Toyota USA to convene an energy summit, and the subject of raising CAFÉ standards, which would by far reduce our oil consumption the most, is only now being discussed seriously.    

 

As with the misinformation the industry provided through politicians in Bush’s first term about drilling in ANWR, the general public doesn’t get the full picture.  In the interest of checks and balances, here are some numbers for review from non-industry sources.  kwc

 

By the Numbers: America's Energy Supply and Demand

Sierra Club Press Release, October 6, 2005

 

GAS PRICES

§         $2.80: Average retail price for regular gasoline, up 88 cents over the last year. [1]

§         $2,873: Amount average family of four will spend on gasoline this year [2]

§         $64.67: Price per barrel of crude oil on the New York Mercantile Exchange, up $15.81 from last year. [3]

OIL DEPENDENCE

§         58%: Total U.S. dependence on net imports of foreign oil in 2005, up from 44.5% in 1995.

§         25%: The percentage of world oil production consumed by the United States.

§         3%: Percentage of world’s oil reserves located in the United States.[4]

§         130,000: Additional barrels of oil consumed per day by the United States as a result of the energy bill extending loopholes for the auto industry that weaken federal fuel economy standards. (Sec. 772)

RECORD PROFITS

§         $25.3 billion: Exxon Mobil's record-setting profits last year.

§         $3.4 billion: Fourth-quarter 2004 profit for Chevron-Texaco Corp, double the profit for the same quarter of the previous year.

§         218%: Exxon Mobil profit increase last year.

§         145%: ConocoPhillips profit increase last year.

§         51%: Shell profit increase last year.

§         39%: ChevronTexaco profit increase last year.

§         35%: BP profit increase last year.

§         22.8 cents Amount of money U.S. oil refiners made in 1999 for every gallon of gasoline.

§         40.8 cents Amount refiners made in 2004 – an 80 percent jump. [5]

§         99 cents Amount refiners were making during September 2005 price spikes. [6]

§         $228 billion Combined profits for the five biggest refiners from 2001-2005.[7]

OIL SPILLS

§         8,000,000 Gallons of oil spilled in southeast Louisiana during and after Hurricane Katrina.[8]

§         11,000,000 Gallons of oil spilled from Exxon Valdez tanker off the coast of Alaska in 1989.

§         285,600 Gallons of oil spilled from Trans-Alaska pipeline in 2001 when a hunter shot a bullet into it.

§         3,000,000 Gallons of oil spilled from offshore oil and gas operations in 73 incidents between 1980 and 1999. [9]

ARCTIC REFUGE, PUBLIC LANDS AND COASTS

§         1 cent Amount of savings for consumers at the pump if we drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

§         20 years When consumers would see the penny savings.[10]

§         6,052 Amount of drilling permits the BLM issued on federal lands in 2004 – a record number.[11]

§         2,702 Number of new wells the oil and gas industries actually drilled.[12]

§         80 Percentage of the nation’s undiscovered Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) gas that is located in areas already open to the oil and gas industry.[13]

REAL SOLUTIONS

§         4 million The number of barrels of oil per day that the United States would save if fuel economy standards were raised to 40 miles per gallon within 20 years. This is more oil than we currently import from the entire Persian Gulf and could ever take out of the Arctic Refuge, combined.

§         $2,200 Amount that the average driver would save at the gas pump over the lifetime of their vehicle if fuel economy standards were raised to 40 miles per gallon over the next 10 years. [14]

§         6 Percentage by which we can reduce natural gas consumption by getting 20 percent of our energy from clean sources like wind and solar.

§         $26.6 billion Amount this would save consumers by 2020. [15]

§         12.6 Percentage of natural gas (projected to be used in 2020) that we could save by using technology available today to make homes, buildings and industry more energy efficient. [16]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] Energy Information Administration (EIA) – www.eia.doe.gov

[2] Consumer Expenditure Survey from Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration

[3] Energy Information Administration (EIA) – www.eia.doe.gov

[4] ibid

[5] 1988-2003 Energy Information Administration, Petroleum Marketing Annual, annual reports and 2004-Energy Information Administration, Petroluem Marketing Montly (April 2005)

[6] Washington Post "Gas Profit Guzzlers," 9/25/2005

[7] United States Securities and Exchange Commission Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

[8] http://www.enn.com/today.html?id=8944

[9] MMS, 2000. Gulf of Mexico OCS Oil and Gas Lease Sale 181, Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), pp. IV-50.

[10] http://www.tws.org/Library/Documents/upload/PennyaGallon20yrs1.pdf

[11] BLM, “Number of APDs approved by Year on Federal Lands” (unpublished table, 1/31/05)

[12] BLM, “Number of Wells Spud During the Year on Federal Lands” (unpublished table, 1/31/05)

[13] U.S. Department of Interior, Minerals Management Service (MMS), 2000. Outer Continental Shelf Petroleum Assessment, 2000, page 5 and Gulf of Mexico Assessment Update

[14] Friedman et al. "Drilling In Detroit: Tapping Automaker Ingenuity to Build Safe and Efficient Automobiles." Union of Concerned Scientists & Center for Auto Safety. June 2001.

[15] Union of Concerned Scientists fact sheet “Renewable Energy Can Help Ease Natural Gas Crunch.”

[16] Nadel, Steve. “A Choice of Two Paths: Energy Savings from Pending Federal Energy Legislation.” April 2005. American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.

 

http://www.commondreams.org/news2005/1006-09.htm

 

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to