Bush, in his Energizer Bunny mode, will declare that It’s Gangbusters, of course!  He will ignore what non-Bush payroll economists refer to as the Two Economies of America. And his privatizing health savings accounts will only making the banks and finance institutions richer, just as his proposal to privatize Social Security would.

 

Bush to use his 5th SofU speech to recharge his presidency  Excerts from tonight’s speech, where the failed oil man practically wedded to Saudi Arabia will tell Americans we are addicted to oil and must change our ways, after years of denial. Do we see the pattern here?   http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11110276/

 

CBS/NYT poll Jan. 26 2006  51% of Americans give him a negative job approval rating. It's the first time in his presidency he'll give a State of the Union speech with a majority of the residents of the country saying they disapprove of the job he's doing…While most Americans believe Mr. Bush displays strong leadership qualities, when it comes to helping the victims of Hurricane Katrina, just 25 percent of those polled think the Bush administration has a clear plan. The public is divided over Mr. Bush's secret domestic surveillance program, with just more than half saying they approve of his authorization of wiretaps without warrants to fight terrorism. At the same time, a clear majority, 64%, is concerned that the Bush administration’s anti-terrorism measures could threaten their civil liberties. A third are "very concerned."  

Presidential Approval Ratings During Second Terms
Bush, January 2006 42 percent
Clinton, January 1998 58 percent
Reagan, January 1986 65 percent
Nixon, January 1974 (Gallup Poll) 26 percent
Eisenhower, January 1958 (Gallup Poll) 58 percent

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/01/26/opinion/polls/main1243679.shtml

 

NBC/Wall Street Journal poll Jan. 26 –29: Bush’s approval rating at 39%, which is unchanged from last month’s NBC/Journal poll. (Other recent national surveys have shown his approval rating to be slightly higher, in the low 40s.) In addition, only 25% say they want to see Bush take the lead role in setting policy for the country, while 49% say they prefer Congress. “He’s off track,” says Hart, who wonders if Bush will use his State of the Union address to strike a more conciliatory tone with his political opponents. “If it is ‘our way or the highway,’ it will be a very long year for the president.  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11103804/

 

Spinning the State of the Union
Based on his record of the past five years, Bush has a pretty weak hand to play.

By Robert Kuttner, American Prospect, Web Exclusive: 01.30.06

How do you give an upbeat State of the Union address when your major foreign policy, Iraq, is a quagmire; your signature domestic program, Medicare drugs, is a bomb; and nearly two thirds of Americans, according to the latest Gallup Poll, think the country is worse off than five years ago?

Here are a few things to watch for in President Bush's first big election-year speech Tuesday:

Mission Accomplished? On Iraq, look for rhetoric of steady resolve, coupled with promises to limit American exposure. Bush could offer a partial reduction of US combat troops during 2006 (in time for the mid-term election) -- but without any realistic prospect of a stable Iraqi government to fill the vacuum. One idea: a ''garrison strategy" of keeping most US forces safely inside bases. This might cut American combat losses, but cede the countryside to guerrilla fighters and anarchy.

The Boy Who Cried Nukes. On Iran, watch for stern saber-rattling without a realistic plan to contain Iran's alarming nuclear ambitions. As former senior national security official Flynt Leverett wrote in a brilliant New York Times piece last week, it's clear that Bush targeted the wrong member of the ''axis of evil" (Iraq) and the wrong strategy to contain it. In 2002-03, the Iranians, then under more moderate leadership, wanted to constructively engage with the United States to resolve differences. Bush blew them off and focused obsessively on Iraq, which turned out not to have nuclear capabilities. The Iranians, who really do have the ability to build nukes, then elected a truly dangerous radical who is expanding his nation's nuclear program. Having bogged down in Iraq, Bush has neither the forces nor the strategy to deal with a real menace partly of his own making in Iran.

Last Refuge of a Scoundrel. Bush will demand that Congress extend the so-called USA Patriot Act, even though he insists that he doesn't need it in order to spy on Americans and conduct searches without warrants. Which is it, Mr. President? Bad law, or bad lawlessness?

Kinder, Gentler, More Deceptive. Expect purely symbolic election-year feints reverting to the rhetoric of the uniter-Bush of 2000, coupled with coded boasting to the Republican base, say, on abortion and the Supreme Court.

Hazardous to Your Health. Very likely: more bad policy ideas that are mainly subsidies to special interests. One really awful proposal likely to be touted is Medical Savings Accounts. With more people losing decent employer-provided insurance, Bush would cut people loose and offer tax incentives to put money into special savings accounts to pay for ''high-deductible" individual policies. These are highly lucrative for the insurance industry, onerous for moderate-income families and people with expensive medical conditions, and the least cost-effective way to provide insurance. If you like the Bush drug plan, you'll love this.

Bragging Rights on Jobs? Bush will emphasize the number of jobs that have been created -- about 2 million in five years (compared with 2 million a year in the 1990s.) He will not emphasize the fact that the median worker has had no net income growth. Real median income fell 1.3 percent last year,

Aliens at our Gates. Having had five years to deal with rising levels of illegal immigration, Bush will flag this as a newly discovered menace. However, he is whipsawed between heartland Republicans who want much tougher policies including a border wall, better ID, and penalties for employers of illegals -- and a corporate community that just loves low-wage, low-benefit, low-rights ''guest-workers."

Lots More Red Ink. Many of Bush's tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans expire in 2010. The latest Congressional Budget Office report projects that if Bush's tax cuts are permitted to expire, the budget will return to surplus but if they are extended the deficit will stay in excess of $340 billion a year. Bush wants to make the tax cuts permanent and add new ones. One high priority for the right: complete elimination of the estate tax, which already has been cut to the point where less than 1 percent of estates pay any tax. Cost to the Treasury of total elimination: $745 billion over a decade. This is enough money to restore all cuts in federal aid to education and to extend Head-Start to all families who qualify.

Based on his record of the past five years, Bush has a pretty weak hand to play. Thanks to a brilliant team of speechwriters and spinmeisters, he is likely to play it well. But the routine is wearing thin.

Robert Kuttner is co-editor of The American Prospect. This column originally appeared in The Boston Globe.

http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=10972

 

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to