On the other hand I sure do appreciate standardization when it comes to 
plugging in appliances in to electric sockets anywhere in North America.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brad McCormick, Ed.D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 12:13 PM
To: Cordell, Arthur: ECOM
Cc: FUTUREWORK (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [Futurework] another devlpt that made globaliz. possible


Cordell, Arthur: ECOM wrote:
> ECONOMIC SCENE
> Business/Financial Desk; SECTC
> *The Container That Changed the World*
> By Virginia Postrel
> 1032 words
> 23 March 2006
> The New York Times <javascript:void(0)>
> Late Edition - Final
>
> THE political showdown over a Dubai company's plan to operate 
> terminals at six American ports briefly focused public attention on 
> one of the most significant, yet least noticed, economic developments 
> of the last few decades: the transformation of international shipping.
>
> *Just as the computer revolutionized the flow of information, the 
> shipping container revolutionized the flow of goods. As generic as the 
> 1's and 0's of computer code, a container can hold just about 
> anything, from coffee beans to cellphone components. By sharply 
> cutting costs and enhancing reliability, container-based shipping 
> enormously increased the volume of international trade and made 
> complex supply chains possible. *
>
> ''
>
[snip]

Is these an ISO standard for "containers"?

But I just don't get it: It sounds like social planning to me, and
that's something to be avoided no matter what its consequences,
just like the Bush administration is leery of the possible invention
of a cure for AIDS since its deployment might encourage sinful behavior
by persons who would no longer have to be afraid of getting AIDS --
or, even if they are foolhardy, would no longer pay the price
anyway (the wages
of sin is death, remember).

I think there should be anti-trust action against the people who
colluded to standardize containers (ditto the people who coordinate
the design of docks to fit the shape of ships, etc. -- and, if the latter
tried to get around this by buying ships to test with, that
should be against the intellectual property laws -- sort of like
reverse-engineering computer hardware).

The only thing that matters is that G-d's Will be Done.  Did
G-d issue an amendment to the 10 commandments:
"Thou shalt ship in standard containers"?  The point of life
is not to be easy but to build character.

In hoc signo....

\brad mccormick

-- 
  Let your light so shine before men,
              that they may see your good works.... (Matt 5:16)

  Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thes 5:21)

<![%THINK;[SGML+APL]]> Brad McCormick, Ed.D. / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
  Visit my website ==> http://www.users.cloud9.net/~bradmcc/ 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to