Harry, you have several times repeated your 'operating rule', but the
problem with it is that you do do quite a bit of harm, for example, with
your insensitivity to the poor, and your ready acceptance of the market
place as the ultimate arbiter of what is good and bad, and your inability to
see past the domain of economics when you address what is important to
people.

To quote something from FDR:  "The test of our progress is not whether we
add more to the abundance of those who have much, it is whether we provide
enough for those who have too little."  Until, in my opinion, you can find
some way of rising to this challenge, your thoughts on society and economics
will always lack something vital.

And, to return to the immediate topic, that one can find an operating rule
that 'doesn't have to change much' does not mean that others do not.  It is
toward this that is what I would like to see you direct your attention.

Cheers,
Lawry

-----Original Message-----
From: Harry Pollard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 6:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Futurework] Coffee anyone?

Lawry,

I am always hopeful - no matter what. 

Attempts are being made constantly to open borders, not always
with success and not always for the right reasons. But, they are
moves toward association rather than separation.

Equality isn't doing too well. One notes that everywhere some are
more equal than others. My favorite operating rule is:

"Do as you wish but harm no-one."

I don't think such an operating rule has to change much over
millennia. 

Harry 

*********************************
Henry George School of Los Angeles
Box 655  Tujunga  CA  91042
818 352-4141
*********************************
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lawrence de Bivort
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 5:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Futurework] Coffee anyone?

Harry,
It would seem that I am more hopeful about society and human
beings than you
are: indeed it seems to me that society does evolve. Working on
improving
the operating rule set is in my experience entirely feasible and,
done well,
successful.

I will buttress my view that it is a society that refuses to
periodically
examine and improve its operating rules that, as you put it,
'devolves',
with a quote from Thomas Jefferson:

"I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and
constitutions. But
law and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of
the human
mind as that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new
discoveries
are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change,
with the
change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep
pace with
the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat
which
fitted him as a boy a civilized society to remain ever under the
regime of
their barbarous ancestors."

Cheers,
Lawry

-----Original Message-----
From: Harry Pollard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 7:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[email protected]
Subject: RE: [Futurework] Coffee anyone?

Lawry,

Practically every concern I buy from will instantly take back
without argument something that doesn't meet my approval. That's
the "normal requirement". So normal that I expect it when I buy. 

When I lived in Canada, Eatons was noted for its instant return
policy across the Dominion (is that word OK now?) 

We would hear that young ladies in remote parts of (say) Alberta
would buy a prom dress - wear it - then return it to Eatons for a
full refund.

Maybe that policy was a reason why Eatons became so large and
profitable.

Henry George's 'Law of Human Progress' suggested that
civilizations survived only when they enjoyed 'association in
equality'. Insomuch as barriers were erected between people or
justice (equality) was diminished, so would civilizations die.

Perhaps societies don't so much evolve as devolve as their
changed "operating rules" fail.

Harry

*********************************
Henry George School of Los Angeles
Box 655  Tujunga  CA  91042
818 352-4141
*********************************
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lawrence de Bivort
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 3:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Futurework] Coffee anyone?

Harry, your notion of a 'normal requirement' is no longer
adequate for our
society. You have to look beyond the assumptions you grew up with
and now so
take for granted. Societies evolve; so must their 'operating
rules.'

Lawry

-----Original Message-----
From: Harry Pollard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 6:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Christoph Reuss';
[email protected]
Subject: RE: [Futurework] Coffee anyone?

Lawry,

In a free society with a free market, if Whole Foods are
producing fungus with their cakes, people will stop buying them
and they'll go broke.

However, it's a non-issue. We buy our cakes from Ruby's in Eagle
Rock (about 12niles from us) and have done so for years. Made on
the premises and delightful - haven't noticed any fungus.

What on earth is this 'moral responsibility' that producers need
rather than the normal requirement to provide what they say they
are providing?

Harry

*********************************
Henry George School of Los Angeles
Box 655  Tujunga  CA  91042
818 352-4141
*********************************
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lawrence de Bivort
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 10:22 AM
To: 'Christoph Reuss'; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Futurework] Coffee anyone?

Yes, this notion of Fair Trade is growing here in the US, too.
There is a
chain of stores, "Ten Thousand Villages" that sells crafts on
this basis.
And then there is Putumayo's CDs, too. Better quality crafts and
music from
these sources than the conventional commercial outlets.

We had Fresh Fields/Whole Foods stores which seemed to have
embraced some
social consciousness, but then, if I remember correctly, they
were bought up
by a conventional chain and their quality has deteriorated (e.g.
mold inside
their layered cakes, because their cakes are made in New York,
frozen and
shipped to the Washington area, and sold in their store bakeries
as if made
fresh).

Thinking back to Arthur's coffee VP, it may be that social
consciousness has
to be embedded in new types of organizations -- where the whole
organization
is designed with that kind of moral responsibility in mind,
rather than
hoping that heroic individuals within conventional organizations
will be
able to flourish.

So perhaps part of a social consciousness initiative might focus
on whole
organizations that are designed and operate around such a
principle.

Cheers,
Lawry

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christoph Reuss
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 1:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Futurework] Coffee anyone?

Lawry asked:
> I wonder if it might be possible to launch a
corporate-responsibility
> consciousness initiative.  I do not mean legislation and
regulated
> protectionism, but a genuine moral initiative that included
specific looks
> at specific executive actions and policies, and recognized and
morally
> rewarded those who reflected that consciousness of
responsibility?

For coffee, sugar, chocolate, bananas etc. there already is one:
The Fair Trade network ( http://www.fairtrade.net ), in N.America
known
as TransFair ( transfairusa.org , transfair.ca ).  They pay much
higher
prices to the growers and guarantee good labor conditions and
democratic
participation rights in small-farmer coops.  The high revenue for
growers
is often used for local educational and health projects, and the
organic
production methods avoid health hazards from pesticides to the
growers.

So it's up to the consumer to vote with their feet.  In
Switzerland,
Fair Trade products (known here as "Max Havelaar" brand) have a
high
market share and can be found in regular store chains.

Chris



_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework



_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework



_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework



_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to