The immigration reform debate just got hotter. Yesterday there were multiple arrests of workers and employers in a national company that makes transportation pallets. They face real jail time. This must have sent a real chill throughout the business community, as they face the consequences of the GOP intersection of isolationalism with law and order purists.

 

This is a long overdue national debate with complex issues. If we allow this to be only a question of law enforcement and not about economics of opportunity and the politics of poverty, then we are only going to see more isolationalist tribal tendencies promoted.

 

By the way, Arizona’s governor just vetoed a bill that would have made criminals of undocumented workers and employers who hire them, but Georgia’s governor signed one into law, though it will face legal challenges. The geopolitics of immigration may alter the midterm elections significantly, just as Dixiecrat politics of the Civil Rights era changed the two political parties back then.

 

And, just as corporations have learned to protect their brand image from bad publicity, the GOP Brand USA is paying the price for poor policy choices – as well as poor implementation, and that may accelerate further. In today’s email and text messaging world, grassroots organizing is cheap, fast and effective. Stay Tuned.  Kwc

 

Mexican consumers plan 'great American boycott'
By Adam Thomson in Mexico City, Financial Times, April 20 2006

Millions of people throughout Mexico are threatening to turn their backs on US products and businesses on May 1 as part of a protest that is being dubbed "The great American boycott".  Teachers, telephone operators, housewives and farmers are just a handful of the groups that have decided on the boycott as a way to support Latin Americans living in the US who have vowed not to turn up to work on May 1.

The protest in the US, called "A day without immigrants", aims to put pressure on Congress to legalise the status of millions of undocumented migrant workers who have become a vital source of cheap labour for the US economy. Senators have been debating several proposals to reform immigration laws but have failed to reach a compromise.

The delay has led to increasing frustration among the Hispanic community in the US, and now it is starting to spread across the border.

In Mexico, by far the biggest source of cheap labour for companies in the US, the boycott is threatening to turn into a nationwide movement. Fernando Amezcua, a high-ranking official at the Mexican Union of Electricians (SME), says his organisation will raise the issue at its general assembly on Monday with the idea of urging its 60,000 members to participate in the protest.  He also says the SME is calling on a wider coalition to support the boycott, which he claims brings together about 10m members of unions, social groups and non-governmental organisations.

On the streets of Mexico City, the word is spreading. Cristina Robles, an elegantly dressed business woman who has just done the family shopping at Superama, a supermarket chain owned by US retailer Wal-Mart, says she will support the ban. "I am not going to buy anything American," she says. "I know it is not easy because there are a lot of illegal immigrants but the US has to treat them the same as any other worker."

Joaquín García Nava, owner of a corner cafe in La Condesa, a swanky neighbourhood in central Mexico City, agrees. "For me, the protest serves a double purpose: I get to support the immigrants and I also get to express my slightly anti­-Yankee sentiments."

In other regions, too, what started out as a grass-roots initiative spread through e-mails is catching on. In Jerez, a town of about 60,000 in Zacatecas, a largely agricultural state to the north of the capital, residents have staged a number of demonstrations in parallel with those that have taken place in recent weeks throughout the US.

Antonio Pereyra, a local government official, says people feel strongly about the need for immigration reform in large part because of their increasing dependence on remittances - money sent back home by immigrants in the US. "Every single family has at least one member working in the US and without the money they send back home every month many would not be able to survive," he says.

According to Mexico's central bank, the estimated 7m Mexicans living and working illegally in the US send their families back home more than $20bn (€16.28bn) a year, making remittances Mexico's second-biggest source of foreign currency after oil.

Larry Rubin, who heads the American Chamber of Commerce in Mexico City, a body that represents US companies in Mexico, is sympathetic to those who are pushing for far-reaching and progressive immigration reform. But he argues that boycotting US products and businesses in Mexico is misguided. "It is totally the wrong approach because the US business community has been one of the most adamant supporters and lobbyists of a comprehensive immigration bill."

http://news.ft.com/cms/s/f0857bb2-d009-11da-80fb-0000779e2340.html

 

ALSO SEE

Ronald Brownstein Blame builds more barriers in Immigration debate: does chutzpah translate in Spanish? [A]s House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wis.) prepared his border security bill last year, the Justice Department asked him to include a provision making unlawful presence in the U.S. a crime. Sensenbrenner, on the House floor in December, said the idea came from the Bush administration, and an administration official last week, speaking anonymously, confirmed his account.
Both parties agree the administration did not tell Sensenbrenner what sort of crime it believed unlawful presence should be. So Sensenbrenner proposed to make it a felony, subject to a year and a day in prison.
Contrary to the description from Speaker Hastert and Sen. Frist, Democrats and immigrant groups opposed this proposal from the start. In particular, they charged that the idea advanced a hidden agenda distinct from the argument about equalizing the penalties for overstaying a visa and sneaking across the border…If House Democrats supported the Sensenbrenner amendment, they would have been voting to make unlawful presence a misdemeanor. But almost all Democrats believe it should not be a crime. The House Democrats' bill retains unlawful presence as a civil, not criminal, violation.
Hastert and Frist charged that House Democrats voted to oppose "efforts to reduce the crime of unlawful presence … from a felony to a misdemeanor." In fact, House Democrats opposed an effort to increase the penalty for unlawful presence from a civil violation to a criminal misdemeanor.

Everyone, including the White House and Senate leaders in both parties, shares culpability for the impasse on immigration. But rewriting the past only makes it tougher to move forward. With this misleading statement, Hastert and Frist seem worried less about resolving the stalemate than trying to ensure that Republicans won't be blamed if it persists.  http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-outlook16apr16,1,6553805.column?coll=la-headlines-politics

 

Economist JK Galbraith Morning in America again: the GOP has awakened an unfriendly giant in their stance on immigration  http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0413-28.htm

 

Eduardo Porter Cost of Illegal Immigration may be less than meets the eye http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/16/business/yourmoney/16view.html

 

Jonathon Singer Criminalization of Illegal Immigration came directly from the White House http://mydd.com/story/2006/4/17/25718/4311

 

Matt Yglesias “Don’t be our guestsImmigration poses some genuine dilemmas for liberals, but one issue should be a no-brainer: guest-worker programs make for bad policy and bad politics. Immigration is that rarest thing in politics - a controversial issue that’s not just “controversial” but actually difficult. People who think immigrants are “stealing their jobs” are mistaken, but politicians who say immigrants do jobs “Americans won't do” are lying. There's no job Americans won't do – it’s just a question of how much Americans want to be paid to do the job. Research indicates that large flows of low-skilled immigrants from Mexico have a small, but quite real, downward pull on the wages of poorly educated people including, of course, many people who’ve already immigrated from Mexico and most of their descendants. On the other hand, immigration has a mildly positive effect on the rest of us, and a hugely positive effect on the immigrants themselves, who tend to be much poorer than even the poorest Americans.  http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=11378

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to