HTML automatically word-wraps and it has other advantages. If you prefer to use crayons instead of modern improvements, so be it.
I have plenty of bandwidth and a very fast cable - downloads more than a megabyte a second. It's good economics to use it. Of course, such things probably haven't reached those little countries on the European continent. Harry ********************************* Henry George School of Los Angeles Box 655 Tujunga CA 91042 818 352-4141 ********************************* >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:futurework- >[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christoph Reuss >Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 4:25 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Futurework] Galbraith and economics > >Brad McCormick wrote: >> Harry Pollard wrote: >> > I write from Outlook through Word and it seems stuck on 14 point. >> >> That's the point(sic). If the email program >> wasn't so damned "smart" -- if it could only send >> plain ASCII, there wouldn't be a problem. > >And btw, plain ASCII would be much more _economical_ in terms of mail size >i.e. wasted bandwidth (especially with the full quotes and since Harry's >"Smarttags"-M$HTML is especially bloated). What might this say about >Harry's efficiency as an economist? (and how consistent is it for him >to pay money to the mother (father) of all fatcats?) > >Chris > > > >_______________________________________________ >Futurework mailing list >[email protected] >http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
