Title: Fwd: Standard Tax Credit Bill
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Al Sheahen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Standard Tax Credit Bill

Dear Friends:
 
It's official.  The first-ever Basic Income Guarantee Bill was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Congressman Bob Filner (D-CA) on May 2, 2006.
 
Below is Filner's statement with a link to the pages in the Congressional Record in which his speech appears.
 
Below that, you'll find a link to the actual bill, which is numbered HR 5257.  You can also access the bill and its status by going to thomas.loc.gov (leave out the www), inserting the bill number, and clicking "search."
 
As you remember, the bill would transform the standard income tax deduction into a standard tax credit of $2000 per adult and $1000 per child.  For the first time, it would give a "refundable tax credit" to everyone who filed an income tax return, even if the person had no income.
 
As you know, the current "Earned Income Tax Credit" provides a small refundable tax credit, but only to those who have some earned income.  Anyone who earns zero is ineligible.  Our Bill would change that.  It would also provide a tax cut for virtually everyone who earns less than about $60,000 a year.
 
We encouraged Filner to hold a news conference to announce the bill, but apparently that is not the way it's done in Washington, apparently because the press never shows up.
 
Getting the Bill to this point has been a true team effort by USBIG.  It was Stan's idea to develop a bill.  Karl came up with the concept of transforming the income tax deduction into a tax credit.  Steve created the title: "A Tax Cut for the Rest of Us" Act.  Along the way, important editing contributions were made by Mike, Eri, Michael and others.
 
By the way, if you'd like to see our final 8-page proposal (which Karl and I originally presented at the 2005 USBIG Conference), let me know and I'll send it to you.   It gives specific tax examples and the whole picture.
 
Now the work begins.  The Bill will be alive for the rest of the year.  Filner is still involved in his primary election campaign, so it's up to us to carry the ball.
 
I see two immediate goals:
 1) get as many Congressional co-sponsors as we can.
 2) get as much support as we can from like-minded organizations.
 
Last year, we were unable to get any Republican co-sponsors, but we'll keep trying.  This year, we want to make an attempt to get Democratic legislatorss to sign on.
 
We've already personally visited with 16 social welfare organizations in Washington, such as Common Cause, Coalition on Human Rights, RESULTS, Center for Community Change, etc.)   We intend to revisit them and others and urge them all to endorse the bill and encourage their membership to contact their representatives to co-sponsor the bill.
 
The larger purpose of both of these goals is to begin to seriously educate activists, legislators, and voters on the wisdom of a full BIG at the poverty level of $10,000, so that when the U.S. political climate changes (which could be sooner rather than later), the topic of a Basic Income Guarantee will be back on the political table, from where it's been missing the past 30 years or so.
 
I welcome any time you can spend on this effort, even if it's only writing to your legislators urging their support.  Talk it up in your community.  If you have more time, come to Washington the week of June 5-9.  We'll make the rounds of some Congressional offices and organizations.  Now would be a good time to start writing op-ed pieces and going on talk shows.
 
If you have other ideas as to how to proceed, let's hear them.  Let's use all our contacts with labor, business, and community organizations to start talking this up.  Maybe this is a good time to implement another of Stan's ideas, to start setting up local BIG groups.
 
Don't forget that Charles Murray, the darling of the Libertarians, has just published a book recommending a $10,000 BIG.  It's a bit more restrictive than our ideal proposal, but it certainly gives more credibility to the overall BIG movement.  We can use it.
 
Best,
 
Al
 
A TAX CUT FOR THE REST OF US -- (Extensions of Remarks - May 02, 2006)
[Page: E688]  GPO's PDF
---
SPEECH OF
HON. BOB FILNER
OF CALIFORNIA
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
TUESDAY, MAY 2, 2006
  • Mr. FILNER. Mr. Speaker, the ``Tax Cut for the Rest of Us'' Act of 2006 (H.R. 5257) transforms the standard income tax deduction into a ``refundable'' standard tax credit. Doing so will not only simplify the tax code, but put
[Page: E689]  GPO's
 PDF
more money into the pockets of poor Americans.
  • For 25 years, refundable tax credits--such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and the ``additional child tax credit''--have proven to be simple, effective ways to help the poor.
  • The logical next step is to transform the standard deduction and personal exemptions into a refundable standard tax credit (STC) of $2,000 for each adult and $1,000 for each child. The STC will provide all the poor with a small but badly needed tax credit, and give a tax cut to virtually everyone who chooses not to itemize their deductions.
  • Transforming the standard deduction into a refundable tax credit will not eliminate poverty, but it will be an enormous benefit to the poor who were completely overlooked by the Bush tax cuts. The poor pay sales taxes, property taxes, and many other taxes, but because they do not pay very much in income tax, they have little to gain from tax simplification unless it includes something like the STC.
  • Transforming the standard deduction into a standard tax credit will give a tax cut to those who need it most. Now is the time to pass a ``Tax Cut for the Rest of Us.''


"Hoffmeister,Thaddeus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[109th] H.R.5257
Title: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a basic income guarantee in the form of a refundable tax credit for taxpayers who do not itemize deductions.
Sponsor: Rep Filner, Bob [D-CA-51] (introduced 5/2/2006)       Cosponsors: (none)
Committees: House Ways and Means
Latest Major Action: 5/2/2006 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
 
 

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to