I am afraid that much that must be done will be looked upon by many as too "dirigiste."  
 
I think that liberal minded people might find themselves in a bit of double bind.  The recipe for reversing the dumbing down of American kids might include some much needed direction or sense of purpose in the lives of these kids as well as the traditional  3 rs.  Learning to think critically is not easy.  But is necessary.
 
Direction could come from many places   It won't come on its own.  And it won't come as a result of video games. Or from TV.  And it won't come from responding to challenges of any kind with an all purpose "whatever" response.
 
Arthur
 
 
 
 


From: Lawrence de Bivort [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 4:23 PM
To: 'Karen Watters Cole'; [email protected]
Cc: Cordell, Arthur: ECOM
Subject: RE: [Futurework] It's About Identity 2: America's Great Wall

Hi, Karen and everyone,

 

This is such a sad situation. Given its wealth and relative enlightenment, America could have achieved a truly wonderful role of genuine leadership in the world, had it not succumbed to the temptations of power and greed. Is this hope truly lost? These last years have been increasingly dark ones, I know. But might there be a means of recapturing those things that were beneficial and generous, and discarding the dark parts of the American culture and policies?

 

In the last couple of years, I’ve had several focused chances to talk with American kids about their view of the world, and the increasingly large gap between the way they view the world and its reality. The reaction is mixed, from dismissal because what I have found myself calling for is a regime that some kids view as onerous and worrisome, to enthusiastic adoption, the kids sensing that here at last was an adult who would talk straight with them and about what would be required for medium- and long-term happiness and success.

 

I do have less sympathy in the plight of older people, who radically underestimated what would be required for a comfortable retirement. It is this older generation that initiated the policy of peace-time massive national debt, for example, quite happy to see their kids pay for them.

 

But it is the kids who are being cheated, by the debt-soaked older generation, and by parents who won’t tell things straight, or themselves don’t understand what is happening in the world.

 

So, short of saying ‘good luck when things hit the wall’, what are things that WE can do NOW to begin to reverse this cultural abdication and help kids get themselves aligned effectively with the dynamics of a globalizing society?

 

Lawry

 

 

 


From: Karen Watters Cole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 3:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cordell, Arthur: ECOM
Subject: RE: [Futurework] It's About Identity 2: America's Great Wall

 

Thanks, Lawry, for resurrecting this topic.

 

Don’t you think that any society, the further it moves away from its original point of reference, will “lose its way”?

 

When we were still mostly agrarian and the middle class was the minority, children were raised with after school chores that correlated to the family’s welfare, i.e., if not milking cows on the farm, tending the vegetable garden in town, maybe a few hen eggs. Eventually, as gardens disappeared chores became setting the table and cleaning, but the connection to survival waned. Activities that built character and taught business experience shifted from neighborhood ties to the service industry, involving kids in lessons further away from home and family connections.

 

Likewise, generations of Americans raised families on the notion that life would be better for their kids, so naturally kids began to see this as their birth right. Our economic success has outpaced our cultural evolution.

 

Some people look forward to our economy ‘hitting the wall’, anticipating that there will be a positive sociocultural transformation (we can only hope…) but perhaps this is romanticizing the Great Depression a la Swiss Family Robinson. For others going ‘cold turkey’ from addictive consumerism will be thrust upon them, rather than a tempered gradual choice. For too many of us, especially the poor, elderly and frail, it will mean disaster because we have not tended to the liberal principles of the greater common good, as in universal health care and education as we should have done.

 

Young people do not understand these broader ramifications, their vision obscured by the immaturity, so that learning to become responsible adults is done outside the family and too many are raised to think adulthood is bestowed upon them at a certain birthday, and with the acquisition of the latest status symbols. This is of course, tribal by nature, but we have lost the connection to why and what for. The substance is lost.

 

Karen

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Cordell, Arthur: ECOM
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 11:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Futurework] It's About Identity 2: America's Great Wall

 

These are indicators of an economy/society that has lost its way.  After it "hits the wall" there will likely be changes in attitude.

 

arthur

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lawrence de Bivort
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 2:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Futurework] It's About Identity 2: America's Great Wall

I think Harry points to a fundamentally important issue.

 

I will indulge in a few generalizations....

 

Why have we created a culture of entitlement? Why do American parents allow their kids to embrace the notions:

1)       That school must be entertaining, or there is something wrong with the teachers?

2)       That they need anything they want?

3)       That ‘hanging out’, ‘chilling,’ and ‘veging’ are acceptable at any time?

4)       That because they are Americans everything will be provided them one way or another?

5)       That ‘having fun’ and ‘being happy’ are the two highest values (and rights) or children?

6)       That working hard is bad and undesirable?

7)       That ‘fashion’ is important?

 

I do believe that children have vastly more ability than their parents give them credit for, and that they embrace challenges when they are framed correctly, and that they are robust enough to ‘know the truth’ about the world and the effects globalization is going to have on their lives.  Why is it that so many parents underestimate the capabilities of their children and educationally under-serve them?

 

Cheers, or sighs,

Lawry

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Pollard
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 2:10 PM
To: 'Cordell, Arthur: ECOM'; 'Ed Weick'; 'Karen Watters Cole'; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Futurework] It's About Identity 2: America's Great Wall

 

I well remember my 10-11 year old sons delivering newspapers in the Canadian snow. Our house was built on nursery land and my kids would harvest asparagus from the unbuilt on fields and sell it to the neighbors.

 

Maybe that attitude has disappeared with the advent of computer games.

 

Harry

 

*********************************

Henry George School of Los Angeles

Box 655  Tujunga  CA  91042

818 352-4141

*********************************

 

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to