Pulling the science handbrake; Stop and smell the ethics;
Massey lecturer questions the pace of progress
Publication: TOR -
Oct 08 01:00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page: D3
Section: Ideas
Edition: ONT
Byline: Stuart Laidlaw
It might just be that we have too many bright ideas, and almost certainly more than we can handle.
In fact, Margaret Somerville, one of
"We have to be careful about maintaining the essence of our humanity,"
says
The Masseys, which begin Wednesday in
Modern technologies give people choices,
"These are questions that no human has ever had to face,"
And with choice comes ethics - the essential question of whether something should be done just because it can be. Where no choice is available, she says, there are no ethics involved. "There wasn't anything you could do, so there was no ethical choice."
For too long, the progress of science has been regarded as an inevitability in Western society, she says, and there is nothing we can do to stop it. Critics of scientific advancement have been dismissed as Luddites or fools afraid of what the future might hold.
That needs to change,
"Sometimes it can be more courageous to say no rather than yes," she says. "Scientific progress without the accompanying social progress is a hollow victory."
This crunch of ethical dilemmas comes just as Western society is
loosening its connection to the institution that once guided people through such
minefields organized religion. For a while, it seemed that religion would be
replaced with a theology of science,
"We made science into a secular religion," she says, pointing to such catchphrases as "miracle drugs" and "modern medical miracle."
Religion, she dryly points out, used to be the only source of miracles.
"We've got to find these areas of overlap," she says, adding that once the commonalities are found, we can move on to exploring what is needed to protect those shared values.
"Let's start from a basic presumption in favour of the integrity of the natural, for us, for our world, for animals, for crops or whatever else.
"Which doesn't mean you can't change it, but it means that the person who wants to change it has to show that they are justified in doing so."
"We are meaning-seeking animals," she says.
The old definition of progress as scientific advancement or monetary success is no longer enough for a growing number of people, she says, and they are seeking other definitions of success in their lives.
"They are interested in progress in areas that we haven't been interested in for quite a while," she says, "like spirituality or values."
_______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
