You can’t succeed, you can’t walk the talk, if you don’t believe in what you preach.

 

The Money Quote: “The 109th reflected a three-decade right-wing effort to degrade the concept and practice of good governance. Its Contempt For Government has been matched effectively by its ability to undermine it.”  [emphasis added]

 

Vote to Clean Congress and change for the better, based on reason and working for the greater common good.

 

109th Congress, We Hate To See You Go

OpEd by Michael McCord, Business Editor, Portsmouth Herald and Sunday Herald, November 6, 2006

Late last month, President Bush looked like a man sucking on rotten lemons when he signed immigration legislation authorizing the building of a 700-mile fence along the Mexican border. To his credit, even Bush, who rarely passes up the chance to demagogue a divisive issue for every last ounce of political gain, knew this absurd bill was a fraud - a product of election-year desperation that likely will never be built because it wasn't funded fully and contains so many caveats that it has become the 700-mile border fence that really isn't. Oh, it also doesn't deal with the complex reality of illegal immigration.

But the faux-fence legislation did provide for a news cycle or two a chance for the Republican leadership - an oxymoron if ever there was - to show it was more than an endless source of fertile material for "The Daily Show." But true to its nature, the border-fence bill only showed why the 109th Congress will go down as one of the most corrupt and hapless in American history. That is no small achievement.

We don't know who will control the 110th Congress, but we do know if this band of brigands in the 109th represented a major corporation, that company would be bankrupt, the shareholders would be left to clean up the mess a la Enron and WorldCom, and the executives would be facing prison. But instead of an endless parade of deserved perp walks, many of these opportunists and enablers will be re-elected.

Here are a few of my favorite reasons why the 109th deserves to be remembered for its uncivil contributions:

Work unethic -- While Rome burned - or in this case Baghdad - the 109th was conspicuous in its absence. President Harry Truman railed against a "do-nothing" Republican-controlled 80th Congress in the 1948 election, but the 109th has taken "do-nothing" to a record level - as in an estimated 93 days of legislative work in the second session.

This explains why Republican 1st District Rep. Jeb Bradley spends so much time at home visiting his constituents. Keeping in touch with the home folks is part of the job, but it begs the question: What are Bradley and the rest of his colleagues doing?

Well, they didn't do much about developing an energy-independence plan or dealing with global warming or Medicare. Though working so little, they didn't come close to putting together a budget on time - much less one that didn't run up hundreds of billions more in federal debt.

But take heart. There was the shameless Terri Schiavo political sideshow or not bothering to know what they were voting on when it came to the torture bill or the Patriot Act. To their credit, they did pass an energy bill that gave tens of billions of dollars in tax cuts to oil companies while they were flush with historically high profits. Call it compassionate conservatism.

Their master's voice - What the Republican-led 109th does best is follow. It has been a panting and happily obedient lapdog to President Bush. Lawmakers must have found the concept of congressional oversight unseemly or just too much work. For a lesson in congressional oversight, consider the Democrat-controlled Congress in 1966, which held tough public hearings on the Vietnam War. To say the least, this did not please President Lyndon Johnson, especially because he didn't want public discussion of a policy that was already failing at the ground level in a midterm election season.

In comparison, Bush has been subject to almost zero scrutiny from the Republican-led Congress. This was one-party rule with a vengeance. The 109th can proudly say, like television's Sgt. Schultz, that it knew nothing, saw nothing and heard nothing. The prevailing attitude is worthy of an ostrich: Ask no tough questions and you can pretend all is well.

As Iraq descended into a modern inferno and threatens to become the greatest foreign policy debacle in our history, this Congress was nowhere to be found on the accountability front - though it did know how to say, "Stay the course." It showed no backbone, no grit, no independence and no curiosity about administration incompetence (perhaps even this cheerleading Congress was surprised by the unimaginable depth of the incompetence).

For example, the 109th asked for minimal accountability regarding the systematic theft of billions of dollars of our taxes going to Iraq. And then when it got that accountability in the form of an honest-to-goodness independent auditor - who proved to be a major embarrassment to the administration - the partisans made sure that wouldn't last too long. The auditor was politely fired by being de-funded, courtesy of a sneaky last-minute provision to the most recent defense spending bill. It was a provision that few, if any, knew about.

But then, knowledge hurts is the prevailing ethos of this Congress.

For sale -- Throughout our history, there has been a bipartisan corruption ebb and flow. When Mark Twain said in the late 19th century that American politicians were the only native criminal class, he was only slightly exaggerating the excesses of his age. He would be right at home today.

The difference with many in this crew is the depth of organization and lack of any ethical concern. Only the most brazen of the bunch were caught -- such as Republicans Tom DeLay or Randy "Duke" Cunningham or Bob Ney or Democrat William Jefferson -- but hundreds more of our elected elite and their staffs are caught in a continuous cycle of legal money laundering.

Not until Rep. Mark Foley, a popular Republican from Florida, was revealed as a connoisseur of teenage congressional pages was the moribund ethics committee revived. But House Speaker Dennis Hastert set the tone by blame shifting and shoulder shrugging. Ethics, it seems, are for sissies and terrorist groupies.

Looney tunes - Every Congress has its share of, shall we say, members of questionable abilities. But this Congress is setting new records for petulant behavior.  Rep. James Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin, considered one of the surlier members in D.C., pouted last year when he was forced by Democrats to actually hold a hearing on the Patriot Act. When the public did show up wanting to learn more, he literally took his gavel and went home. To make his point, he turned off the lights to the hearing room as he walked out. Just the sort of civics lesson we want to pass on to our children.

Sensenbrenner, for those who haven't paid attention, wants to have the Patriot Act enthusiastically enforced -- against Americans.

Then there's Rep. Jean Schmidt, R-Ohio, who has redefined what it means to be a witless political hack. Last year on the House floor, she called Rep. Jack Murtha, D-Pennsylvania, a "coward" and a cut-and-runner for advocating the removal of American troops from Iraq. When informed that Murtha was a decorated Marine Corps combat veteran, Schmidt said she didn't know that. That she hadn't bothered to find out just who she was slandering speaks volumes about the civil tone set in this Congress.

Mission accomplished -- But we must give credit where credit is due. The 109th reflected a three-decade right-wing effort to degrade the concept and practice of good governance. Its contempt for government has been matched effectively by its ability to undermine it. It's proven to be a major success, a self-fulfilling prophecy come true. Alas, it's an adolescent legacy that will be easy to overcome for succeeding Congresses, no matter who's in charge.

http://www.seacoastonline.com/news/11052006/business-bizsun1105_limb.html

 

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to