Fascinating programme on future of work, etc.  WalMart, China, etc.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/walmart/

Edna Bonacich is a professor of sociology at the University of
California, Riverside. In this interview, she explains how global
retailers, like Wal-Mart, have wrested control of the supply chain from
manufacturers through a revolution in information technology and
logistics. Capitalizing on technological innovations like the bar code,
says Bonacich, has allowed Wal-Mart to "master the process of
production, the movement of goods, the warehousing of goods, to make
sure it arrives at the right place at the right time. And they're very
good at squeezing the price out of that." But, she argues, this
efficiency has been at the expense of the American worker and the loss
of American jobs. "What is going on is that manufacturing is leaving the
United States ... and moving to poorer and poorer countries," Bonacich
tells FRONTLINE. "And some people describe this as a 'race to the
bottom,' because the various developing countries are vying for the work
and are vying by undercutting each other..." This interview was
conducted June 9, 2004.

Nelson Lichtenstein teaches U.S. labor history at the University of
California, Santa Barbara, where he is at work on a book about Wal-Mart
and 21st century capitalism. In this interview, he compares the Wal-Mart
model of employment to that of General Motors, both of which he calls
"template" firms. "When you had a job at General Motors, it was a
lifetime job," he says. "It was a high-wage job, and there were often
many, many benefits attached to it." Lichtenstein says the Wal-Mart
model of employment, based on low wages, low skills, low benefits and
rapid job turnover, is becoming the template for American firms to
follow, but that this model is eroding the American middle-class
standard of living. "What I think is the road forward here," he argues,
"is we want to take the efficiencies that have been generated by
Wal-Mart -- and they are real efficiencies -- and we want to shape them
and control them and regulate them in such a way that the benefits of
these are distributed widely throughout the society, within the firm
between its managers and its employees, and then in the rest of the
United States as well." This interview was conducted June 9, 2004.

Ray Bracy is Wal-Mart's vice president for federal and international
public affairs. In this interview, he describes how the company turned
to global sourcing as far back as the 1970s to obtain merchandise at low
costs so the company could pass the savings on to consumers. He
estimates that Wal-Mart imports approximately $15 billion in goods from
China each year. Bracy argues that by being candid and negotiating with
its suppliers to get merchandise at the lowest possible cost, Wal-Mart
is helping its suppliers become more efficient. "I think most
[suppliers] that I've heard from will say that we are tough, that we're
demanding, but they also say we're fair," he tells FRONTLINE. Bracy
argues that U.S. manufacturers are being squeezed by the high costs of
doing business in America, including health care, tax rates and
government regulations, that are beyond Wal-Mart's control, and he
maintains that the company has an obligation to provide its consumers
with low prices. This interview was conducted on Sept. 17, 2004.

A professor of sociology at Duke University, Gereffi has studied the
recent power shift in the world economy from the manufacturing sector to
the retail sector, and the migration of manufacturing jobs from the U.S.
to China and other East Asian countries. In this interview, he explains
how global retailers like Wal-Mart have used new technologies to gain
control of the supply chain and how they have thus driven the process of
shifting U.S. manufacturing jobs overseas. Gereffi says that, having
concentrated 20 percent of U.S. retail demand, "the decisions [Wal-Mart]
makes about where it's going to go around the world don't just affect
the U.S. economy, but they affect the fate of countries that are
exporting to the United States as well. Other countries really want
Wal-Mart to be going to them, and so Wal-Mart is in a position to
orchestrate what goes on in many different countries around the
world..." This interview was conducted on Sept. 9, 2004.

A fellow at the United States Business and Industry Council, Tonelson is
the author of The Race to the Bottom: Why a Global Worker Surplus and
Uncontrolled Free Trade are Sinking American Living Standards. In this
interview, he explains how recent international trade agreements --
particularly with China -- have sent many American manufacturing jobs
offshore and created a massive trade imbalance that threatens the future
of the American economy. "The problem is that U.S. trade policy writ
large has encouraged large and politically powerful multinational
companies to supply the U.S. market from China," he argues. "It gives
these firms the ability to charge U.S. prices for goods ... but to pay
Chinese wages." Tonelson warns that unless the government reigns in
these trade imbalances, a growing U.S. debt will mean that Americans
will no longer be able to afford goods from overseas. "... [U]ltimately
American consumers have to earn U.S. wages to pay U.S. prices," he says.
This interview was conducted May 27, 2004.



_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to