Jan. 10, 2007 “If we increase our support at this crucial moment, and help
the Iraqis break the current cycle of violence, we can hasten the day our
troops begin coming home," Pres. Bush in his White House library speech.
<http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070111/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq>

The Senate directed its displeasure today at Sec. Rice. A dozen Republicans
joined Democrats renouncing Bush policy. In private briefings last week,
when asked why this latest plan would work, Pres. Bush told Republicans
“because it has to.” But we have heard nothing real about an exit plan.

C/o Will Bunch @ Attytoode, 40 years ago last night Pres. Johnson spoke to
Americans about another desperate escalation. At that time, a little less
than 8,000 US troops had died in Vietnam. From 1966 to 1975, another 50,000+
would die.

Here is a comparison of statements by Pres. Johnson and Bush, 40 years
apart, on troop escalation citing domino theories and prevention, arguing
that we have to escalate before we can withdraw:
LBJ, Jan. 10, 1967: We have chosen to fight a limited war in Vietnam in an
attempt to prevent a larger war--a war almost certain to follow, I believe,
if the Communists succeed in overrunning and taking over South Vietnam by
aggression and by force. I believe, and I am supported by some authority,
that if they are not checked now the world can expect to pay a greater price
to check them later.
GWB, Jan. 10, 2007: Tonight in Iraq, the Armed Forces of the United States
are engaged in a struggle that will determine the direction of the global
war on terror – and our safety here at home. The new strategy I outline
tonight will change America's course in Iraq, and help us succeed in the
fight against terror.
LBJ, Jan. 10, 1967: I wish I could report to you that the conflict is almost
over. This I cannot do. We face more cost, more loss, and more agony. For
the end is not yet. I cannot promise you that it will come this year--or
come next year. Our adversary still believes, I think, tonight, that he can
go on fighting longer than we can, and longer than we and our allies will be
prepared to stand up and resist.
GWB, Jan. 10, 2007: Our past efforts to secure Baghdad failed for two
principal reasons: There were not enough Iraqi and American troops to secure
neighborhoods that had been cleared of terrorists and insurgents. And there
were too many restrictions on the troops we did have.
LBJ, Jan. 10, 1967: Our South Vietnamese allies are also being tested
tonight. Because they must provide real security to the people living in the
countryside. And this means reducing the terrorism and the armed attacks
which kidnapped and killed 26,900 civilians in the last 32 months, to levels
where they can be successfully controlled by the regular South Vietnamese
security forces. It means bringing to the villagers an effective civilian
government that they can respect, and that they can rely upon and that they
can participate in, and that they can have a personal stake in. We hope that
government is now beginning to emerge.
GWB, Jan. 10, 2007: Only the Iraqis can end the sectarian violence and
secure their people. And their government has put forward an aggressive plan
to do it.
LBJ, Jan. 10, 1967: This forward movement is rooted in the ambitions and the
interests of Asian nations themselves. It was precisely this movement that
we hoped to accelerate when I spoke at Johns Hopkins in Baltimore in April
1965, and I pledged "a much more massive effort to improve the life of man"
in that part of the world, in the hope that we could take some of the funds
that we were spending on bullets and bombs and spend it on schools and
production.
GWB, Jan. 10, 2007: A successful strategy for Iraq goes beyond military
operations. Ordinary Iraqi citizens must see that military operations are
accompanied by visible improvements in their neighborhoods and communities.
So America will hold the Iraqi government to the benchmarks it has
announced.
LBJ, Jan. 10, 1967: We have chosen to fight a limited war in Vietnam in an
attempt to prevent a larger war--a war almost certain to follow, I believe,
if the Communists succeed in overrunning and taking over South Vietnam by
aggression and by force. I believe, and I am supported by some authority,
that if they are not checked now the world can expect to pay a greater price
to check them later.
GWB, Jan. 10, 2007: The challenge playing out across the broader Middle East
is more than a military conflict. It is the decisive ideological struggle of
our time…In the long run, the most realistic way to protect the American
people is to provide a hopeful alternative to the hateful ideology of the
enemy – by advancing liberty across a troubled region.
LBJ, Jan. 10, 1967: A time of testing--yes. And a time of transition. The
transition is sometimes slow; sometimes unpopular; almost always very
painful; and often quite dangerous. But we have lived with danger for a long
time before, and we shall live with it for a long time yet to come. We know
that "man is born unto trouble." We also know that this Nation was not
forged and did not survive and grow and prosper without a great deal of
sacrifice from a great many men.
GWB, Jan. 10, 2007: Victory will not look like the ones our fathers and
grandfathers achieved. There will be no surrender ceremony on the deck of a
battleship…A democratic Iraq will not be perfect. But it will be a country
that fights terrorists instead of harboring them – and it will help bring a
future of peace and security for our children and grandchildren.

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to