1. Background: Robert Kuttner’s Aug. 28, 2006 survey piece in American
Prospect, See Dick Run (the Country) Why does this matter?
“If Cheney were the actual president, not just the de facto one, he simply
could not govern with the same set of policies and approval ratings of 20%.
The media focuses relentless attention on the president, on the premise that
he is actually the chief executive. But for all intents and purposes, Cheney
is chief, and Bush is more in the ceremonial role of the queen of England.
Yet the press buys the pretense of Bush being the ‘decider’…
You can count serious newspaper or magazine articles on Cheney's operation
on the fingers of one hand. One of the first was by Bob Dreyfuss writing in
the Prospect -- " Vice Squad
<http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewPrint&articleId=1
1401> ," on all the vice-president's men, which ran in our May issue.
Another notable example is Charlie Savage's important May 28th piece
<http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/05/28/cheney_aide_is_screen
ing_legislation/>  in The Boston Globe on Cheney operative David Addington,
the architect and chief reviewer of legislation for "signing statements."
The most comprehensive was Jane Mayer's fine piece
<http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060703fa_fact1>  in the July
3 New Yorker on Addington.”
http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=1192
6
<http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=119
26>

2. Cheney’s Shadow looms over Libby trial: “Cheney's press officer, Cathie
Martin, approached his chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, on Air
Force Two on July 12, 2003, to ask how she should respond to journalists'
questions about Joseph C. Wilson IV. Libby looked over one of the reporters'
questions and told Martin: "Well, let me go talk to the boss and I'll be
back."
On Libby's return, Martin testified in federal court last week, he brought a
card with detailed replies dictated by Cheney, including a highly partisan,
incomplete summary of Wilson's investigation into Iraq's suspected weapons
of mass destruction program.
Libby subsequently called a reporter, read him the statement, and said --
according to the reporter -- he had "heard" that Wilson's investigation was
instigated by his wife, an employee at the CIA, later identified as Valerie
Plame. The reporter, Matthew Cooper of Time magazine, was one of five people
with whom Libby discussed Plame's CIA status during those critical weeks
that summer.
After seven days of such courtroom testimony, the unanswered question
hanging over Libby's trial is, did the vice president's former chief of
staff decide to leak that disparaging information on his own?  No evidence
has emerged that Cheney told him to do it. But Cheney's dictated reply is
one of many signs to emerge at the trial of the vice president's unusual
attentiveness to the controversy and his desire to blunt it.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/03/AR2007020301
344.html
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/03/AR200702030
1344.html>

References: The AP has a list of documents presented as evidence in the
Libby trial. So does the Washington Post, but then you have to put up with
the annoying ads.  http://wid.ap.org/documents/libbytrial/index.html
<http://wid.ap.org/documents/libbytrial/index.html>

Again, what does it matter? As the fifth year of Bush’s war looms ahead,
with no exit strategy or quantitative improvement, a much-delayed NIE admits
that the ‘surge’ won’t work, the Sunnis and Shiites will not be put back
together again. And the Iraqi Interior Minister announced that 1,000 Iraqis
died this week. As the POTUS asks Congress for another XXX BILLION, give or
take a few million hidden in the budgets of other agencies, and the American
people become more cynical and distrusting of their own government, why
should we be concerned about the perjury trial of ‘Scooter’ Libby?

3. David Ignatius A Failed Coverup: “Why was the White House so nervous in
the summer of 2003 about the CIA's reporting on alleged Iraqi attempts to
buy uranium from Niger to build a nuclear bomb? That's the big question that
runs through the many little details that have emerged in the perjury trial
of Vice President Cheney's former top aide, Lewis "Scooter" Libby.

The trial record suggests a simple answer: The White House was worried that
the CIA would reveal that it had been pressured in 2002 and early 2003 to
support administration claims about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, and
that in the Niger case, the CIA had tried hard to resist this pressure. The
machinations of Cheney, Libby and others were an attempt to weave an
alternative narrative that blamed the CIA.

The truth began to emerge on July 11, 2003, when CIA Director George Tenet
issued a public statement
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/plame/54201.pdf>
disclosing that the agency had tried to warn the White House off the Niger
allegations. In that sense, the Libby trial is about a cover-up that failed.
So we begin to understand why the White House was worried about the CIA in
the summer of 2003: It feared the agency would breach the wall of silence
about the claims regarding weapons of mass destruction.

Robert Grenier, a CIA official who was the agency's Iraq mission manager,
told colleagues that he remembered "a series of insistent phone calls" that
month from Libby, who wanted the CIA to tell reporters that "other community
elements such as State and DOD" had encouraged Wilson's Niger trip, not just
Cheney.  The bottom line? Grenier was asked in court last week to explain
the White House's 2003 machinations. Here's what he said
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/24/AR200701240
0944.html> : "I think they were trying to avoid blame for not providing [the
truth] about whether or not Iraq had attempted to buy uranium." Let me say
it again: This trial is about a cover-up that failed.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/01/AR2007020101
784.html
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/01/AR200702010
1784.html>

4. Frank Rich Why Dick Cheney Cracked Up “What we are learning from Mr.
Libby’s trial is just what a herculean effort it took to execute this
two-pronged cover-up after Mr. Wilson’s article appeared. Mr. Cheney was the
hands-on manager of the 24/7 campaign of press manipulation and high-stakes
character assassination, with Mr. Libby as his chief hatchet man. Though Mr.
Libby’s lawyers are now arguing that their client was a sacrificial lamb
thrown to the feds to shield Mr. Rove, Mr. Libby actually was — and still
is — a stooge for the vice president.
Whether he will go to jail for his misplaced loyalty is the human drama of
his trial. But for the country there are bigger issues at stake, and they
are not, as the White House would have us believe, ancient history. The
administration propaganda flimflams that sold us the war are now being
retrofitted to expand and extend it.
Call it a coincidence — though there are no coincidences — but it’s only
fitting that the Libby trial began as news arrived of the death of E. Howard
Hunt, the former CIA agent whose bungling of the Watergate break-in sent him
to jail and led to the unraveling of the Nixon presidency two years later.
Still, we can’t push the parallels too far. No one died in Watergate. This
time around our country can’t wait two more years for the White House to be
stopped from playing its games with American blood.”
http://www.commondreams.org/views07/0204-22.htm
<http://www.commondreams.org/views07/0204-22.htm>

If we really were a democracy, as others have argued, we would have already
replaced the president and vice president, after the resounding, historical
midterm election defeat on November 7, 2006. The public’s opinion is that
this administration is done, it has no credibility. So why are we tolerating
more robbery of human life and treasury? Have we become so accustomed to
outrage that we no longer expect to do the right thing?

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to