Well, Harry, you stirred me up. So are you characterizing me as an anti-Israelite?
If so, you are despicable. I have spent decades studying the Middle East, and am recognized as a subject matter expert on it. I have clients on both sides of the conflict between Israelis and the Palestinians, and have the respect of both. You owe me an unequivocal apology. But will you have the honor to proffer it? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Pollard Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 6:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Futurework] with friends & gov't like these,who needs al-Qaeda? Mike, I didn't do "research". As the subject came up, I checked it out on google to remind myself of it.. A matter of simple curiosity, whereupon I put the URL in a post and forgot about it. However, I stirred up the anti-Israelites, particularly when I said I had no interest in the 40 year old event. However, the first up on google was apparently a "hard rock" pro-Israel site. I did note that that the article brought in some other references, but I didn't follow them. Hardly research. As you say, one has to be careful when one looks at internet information. It comes at you from every direction and care must be taken before "absolute truth" is accepted. Harry ********************************** Henry George School of Social Science of Los Angeles. Box 655 Tujunga CA 91042 818 352-4141 ********************************** > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:futurework- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Spencer > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11:00 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Futurework] Re: with friends & gov't like these, who needs > al-Qaeda? > > > > > "just reading the first one that came up" is a terrible way to do > > research, Harry. > > Indeed. OTOH, the net is loaded with contradictory assertions, claims > and observations, largely indistinguisable from fabrications and > deliberate disinformation. It's unlikely that we or anyone other than > the original players will ever know the truth. This is generally the > case with any event in which powerful entities -- governments, > corporations, cliques or individuals -- have sufficient motivation for > obfuscation that they go to great lengths and expense to muddy the > waters. > > But should you have the time and inclination, this: > > http://cryptome.org/nsa-liberty.htm > http://www.nsa.gov/liberty/ > > > is perhaps your best source for further reading. > > > - Mike > > -- > Michael Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada .~. > /V\ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /( )\ > http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/ ^^-^^ > _______________________________________________ > Futurework mailing list > Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca > http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.14/845 - Release Date: > 6/12/2007 6:39 AM > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.14/845 - Release Date: 6/12/2007 6:39 AM _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
