> ______________________________________________ 
> From:         Cordell, Arthur: ECOM  
> Sent: Monday, February 4, 2008 11:51 AM
> To:   futurework
> Subject:      job market is even worse than you think
> 
> Why job market is even worse than you think
> Nation's first job loss in more than four years tells only part of the
> story of the weak labor market. The ranks of the long-term unemployed
> are growing.
> By Chris Isidore, CNNMoney.com senior writer 
> http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/01/news/economy/longterm_unemployment/ind
> ex.htm?section=money_mostpopular
> February 2 2008: 9:05 AM EST 
> NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- A government report on January jobs showing
> that employers trimmed payrolls for the first time in four years set
> off alarm bells.
> But the report, which was released Friday, tells only part of the
> story about the underlying weakness in the labor market.
> The number of Americans out of work for at least six months is rising
> - reaching levels more typically seen deep into a recession or period
> of job contraction, not at the beginning.
> And while some economists believe that the drop in jobs reported in
> January might later be revised away to show a narrow gain, it's clear
> that the rise in long-term unemployment is a far more established
> trend and one economists say isn't going away anytime soon.
> Harder to find a new job. The number of long-term unemployed stood at
> a seasonally-adjusted 1.4 million in January, up about 21% from
> year-earlier levels and up 3% from the previous month. The full-year
> average for 2007 was 1.2 million long-term unemployed, nearly double
> the reading for 2000 - just before the last recession.
> For all of 2007, about 17.6% of those who were unemployed had been out
> of work six months or more. That compares to only 11.4% who were
> long-term unemployed in 2000.
> And while the unemployment rate dropped to 4.9% in January from 5% in
> December, the latest reading showed 18.3% of the unemployed have now
> been out of work for at least six months.
> "You have to understand that 5% unemployment today is worse than 5%
> unemployment 10-15 years ago," said Jason Furman, senior fellow,
> Brookings Institution.
> Furman and others say long-term unemployment is not just a problem for
> those struggling to find jobs. It poses a risk for the economy as a
> whole and cuts into household earnings and economic output.
> If 5% of the labor force is unemployed for a short time as they switch
> jobs, they could keep spending, drawing on a combination of government
> assistance and personal savings.
> But those who are unemployed more than six months lose unemployment
> insurance benefits and are more likely to deplete savings to the point
> where they are forced to cut back on spending.
> They also will be far more likely to accept jobs at lower pay than
> their previous positions, which puts downward pressure on wages.
> "We are looking at a labor market already that is weak and set to get
> a lot weaker," said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic
> and Policy Research.
> Job seeker surprised by difficulty. Les Tarlton had worked in the
> telecom industry for eight years when the company he was working for
> shut its operations near his suburban Dallas home in January 2003.
> "I thought surely I can go out and get a job," he said. "I had a good
> reputation in the company. I had survived a lot of earlier layoffs. It
> wasn't like I lost my job because of anything I did."
> But five years later he has yet to find a permanent job to replace the
> one he had doing business performance analysis. He's had a variety of
> short-term contract positions, but nothing long-term.
> "Part of it is my age," said Tarlton, 54. "They can hire a person
> straight out of college for a lot less money. And while I have skills
> in business and finance, my college degrees in are in Christianity and
> psychology, my master's is in theology. That doesn't help."
> Tarlton is now home schooling his six-year old and taking care of his
> other four children while his wife works. But the total household
> income is a fraction of what it used to be. While he still sends out
> about five resumes a week, he said he essentially gave up hopes of a
> new job about two years ago.
> "We've burned through all of our retirement trying to survive," he
> said.
> Problem could get worse As the stimulus package makes its way through
> the Senate, there have been pushes to extend unemployment benefits
> beyond six months.
> Even if it's not included in this bill, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
> said she would support separate legislation to address the growing
> problem.
> "While it might have been premature to extend benefits in the past at
> this level of unemployment, today it could be overdue," said Furman.
> If the economy does enter a recession, the problem of long-term
> unemployment could reach levels not seen since the early 1980's,
> according to Baker.
> A report from the Congressional Budget Office last October confirmed
> that the long-term unemployment problem is a growing one, suggesting
> there could be a fundamental shift in the labor markets.
> "People are less likely to become unemployed than in the past, but
> those who do become unemployed are more likely to remain unemployed
> for more than half a year," said the October 2007 report.
> Older work force playing a role The CBO report didn't have any easy
> answers for this trend. But it suggested that the aging of the work
> force might be a major contributing factor.
> Baker agrees that the demographic shift is probably part of the
> problem.
> "Someone well into their forties who loses their job at their peak
> earning potential, they might be expecting a higher pay than someone
> in their twenties," Baker said. "Even if they're willing to take a
> lower paying job, the employer might decide not to offer it to them
> because they'll fear the older worker won't be loyal."
> The CBO report added that some firms are using temporary layoffs less
> frequently than in the past. When someone loses a job today, it's
> likely a permanent separation.
> Employers and workers getting more picky Officials in job outplacement
> firms, hired by firms to work with employees who have lost their jobs,
> say they're seeing some increase in the time it takes to find new
> positions even for those generally better educated workers with whom
> they work.
> Cory Holbrough, senior vice president of Lee Hecht Harrison, said that
> employers for skilled positions are becoming more selective about new
> hires than they used to be.
> "In the past they might have hired the best person who had eight or
> nine of the ten skill sets they were looking for," he said. "Now they
> are saying, 'We want all ten skill sets.'"
> ==================
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to