Natalia,

 

The planners and forecasters make up scenarios of all kinds
trying to think things out before they happen.

 

These could range from Global Warming creating a world of
milk and honey, to Global Warming causing a hell on earth.

 

None of them are real. They are speculations on what might
happen across a range of possibilities.

 

If one of these "secret reports" is leaked (and who wants to
leak a forecast that is good?) we get a reaction like the
article.

 

You properly say it might not be true.

 

Trouble with the Internet is that Monday's surmise becomes
Friday's rock-hard certainty.

 

As you know, I remain unconvinced by Global Warming (too
much contrary evidence). However,  I have, over the last few
months, suggested that some cooling may be in the works.
Nothing very concrete - but snippets which give one pause.

 

Well, the latest blockbuster is a release that says four of
the major temperature recording stations have found a severe
drop in the last year - enough to wipe out the warming of
the last century.

 

I bet this will be picked up by anti-GW advocates (not
scientists) as "proof" of something. However, I can't find
sources, so I take it with a grain of salt until I do.

 

I bet by this weekend, the antis will put this all over the
Internet as a truth that cannot be denied.

 

Propaganda cuts both ways.

 

I'll let you know if there is real evidence about a
temperature drop. 

 

Harry

 

******************************

Harry Pollard

Henry George School of Los Angeles

Box 655

Tujunga  CA  91042

(818) 352-4141

******************************

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Darryl or Natalia
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 7:37 PM
To: futurework
Subject: [Futurework] secret Pentagon report on climate
change

 

Apparently suppressed since 2004, and not to say that it's
true:

Natalia


Now the Pentagon tells Bush: climate change will destroy us


. Secret report warns of rioting and nuclear war
. Britain will be 'Siberian' in less than 20 years 
. Threat to the world is greater than terrorism

*       Mark Townsend
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/marktownsend>  and Paul
Harris <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/paulharris>  in
New York 

*       The Observer <http://observer.guardian.co.uk> , 

*       Sunday February 22 2004

*       Article <http://www.guardian.co.uk/history/4864237>
history . 

*       Contact
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/contactus/4864237>  us


Contact us


Close 

*       Contact the Environment editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

*       Report errors or inaccuracies: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*       Letters for publication should be sent to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

*       If you need help using the site:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

*       Call the main Guardian and Observer switchboard: 
+44 (0)20 7278 2332 

*        

o   Advertising guide <http://adinfo-guardian.co.uk/>  

o   License/buy our content
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/syndication/>  


About this article


Close 

This article appeared in the Observer
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/theobserver>  on Sunday February
22 2004 . It was last updated at 01:33 on February 22 2004. 

Climate change over the next 20 years could result in a
global catastrophe costing millions of lives in wars and
natural disasters.. 

A secret report, suppressed by US defence chiefs and
obtained by The Observer, warns that major European cities
will be sunk beneath rising seas as Britain is plunged into
a 'Siberian' climate by 2020. Nuclear conflict,
mega-droughts, famine and widespread rioting will erupt
across the world. 

The document predicts that abrupt climate change could bring
the planet to the edge of anarchy as countries develop a
nuclear threat to defend and secure dwindling food, water
and energy supplies. The threat to global stability vastly
eclipses that of terrorism, say the few experts privy to its
contents. 

'Disruption and conflict will be endemic features of life,'
concludes the Pentagon analysis. 'Once again, warfare would
define human life.' 

The findings will prove humiliating to the Bush
administration, which has repeatedly denied that climate
change even exists. Experts said that they will also make
unsettling reading for a President who has insisted national
defence is a priority. 

The report was commissioned by influential Pentagon defence
adviser Andrew Marshall, who has held considerable sway on
US military thinking over the past three decades. He was the
man behind a sweeping recent review aimed at transforming
the American military under Defence Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld. 

Climate change 'should be elevated beyond a scientific
debate to a US national security concern', say the authors,
Peter Schwartz, CIA consultant and former head of planning
at Royal Dutch/Shell Group, and Doug Randall of the
California-based Global Business Network. 

An imminent scenario of catastrophic climate change is
'plausible and would challenge United States national
security in ways that should be considered immediately',
they conclude. As early as next year widespread flooding by
a rise in sea levels will create major upheaval for
millions. 

Last week the Bush administration came under heavy fire from
a large body of respected scientists who claimed that it
cherry-picked science to suit its policy agenda and
suppressed studies that it did not like. Jeremy Symons, a
former whistleblower at the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), said that suppression of the report for four months
was a further example of the White House trying to bury the
threat of climate change. 

Senior climatologists, however, believe that their verdicts
could prove the catalyst in forcing Bush to accept climate
change as a real and happening phenomenon. They also hope it
will convince the United States to sign up to global
treaties to reduce the rate of climatic change. 

A group of eminent UK scientists recently visited the White
House to voice their fears over global warming, part of an
intensifying drive to get the US to treat the issue
seriously. Sources have told The Observer that American
officials appeared extremely sensitive about the issue when
faced with complaints that America's public stance appeared
increasingly out of touch. 

One even alleged that the White House had written to
complain about some of the comments attributed to Professor
Sir David King, Tony Blair's chief scientific adviser, after
he branded the President's position on the issue as
indefensible. 

Among those scientists present at the White House talks were
Professor John Schellnhuber, former chief environmental
adviser to the German government and head of the UK's
leading group of climate scientists at the Tyndall Centre
for Climate Change Research. He said that the Pentagon's
internal fears should prove the 'tipping point' in
persuading Bush to accept climatic change. 

Sir John Houghton, former chief executive of the
Meteorological Office - and the first senior figure to liken
the threat of climate change to that of terrorism - said:
'If the Pentagon is sending out that sort of message, then
this is an important document indeed.' 

Bob Watson, chief scientist for the World Bank and former
chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
added that the Pentagon's dire warnings could no longer be
ignored. 

'Can Bush ignore the Pentagon? It's going be hard to blow
off this sort of document. Its hugely embarrassing. After
all, Bush's single highest priority is national defence. The
Pentagon is no wacko, liberal group, generally speaking it
is conservative. If climate change is a threat to national
security and the economy, then he has to act. There are two
groups the Bush Administration tend to listen to, the oil
lobby and the Pentagon,' added Watson. 

'You've got a President who says global warming is a hoax,
and across the Potomac river you've got a Pentagon preparing
for climate wars. It's pretty scary when Bush starts to
ignore his own government on this issue,' said Rob
Gueterbock of Greenpeace. 

Already, according to Randall and Schwartz, the planet is
carrying a higher population than it can sustain. By 2020
'catastrophic' shortages of water and energy supply will
become increasingly harder to overcome, plunging the planet
into war. They warn that 8,200 years ago climatic conditions
brought widespread crop failure, famine, disease and mass
migration of populations that could soon be repeated. 

Randall told The Observer that the potential ramifications
of rapid climate change would create global chaos. 'This is
depressing stuff,' he said. 'It is a national security
threat that is unique because there is no enemy to point
your guns at and we have no control over the threat.' 

Randall added that it was already possibly too late to
prevent a disaster happening. 'We don't know exactly where
we are in the process. It could start tomorrow and we would
not know for another five years,' he said. 

'The consequences for some nations of the climate change are
unbelievable. It seems obvious that cutting the use of
fossil fuels would be worthwhile.' 

So dramatic are the report's scenarios, Watson said, that
they may prove vital in the US elections. Democratic
frontrunner John Kerry is known to accept climate change as
a real problem. Scientists disillusioned with Bush's stance
are threatening to make sure Kerry uses the Pentagon report
in his campaign. 

The fact that Marshall is behind its scathing findings will
aid Kerry's cause. Marshall, 82, is a Pentagon legend who
heads a secretive think-tank dedicated to weighing risks to
national security called the Office of Net Assessment.
Dubbed 'Yoda' by Pentagon insiders who respect his vast
experience, he is credited with being behind the Department
of Defence's push on ballistic-missile defence. 

Symons, who left the EPA in protest at political
interference, said that the suppression of the report was a
further instance of the White House trying to bury evidence
of climate change. 'It is yet another example of why this
government should stop burying its head in the sand on this
issue.' 

Symons said the Bush administration's close links to
high-powered energy and oil companies was vital in
understanding why climate change was received sceptically in
the Oval Office. 'This administration is ignoring the
evidence in order to placate a handful of large energy and
oil companies,' he added.






  _____  

avast! Antivirus <http://www.avast.com> : Outbound message
clean. 

Virus Database (VPS): 080224-0, 02/24/2008
Tested on: 2/24/2008 7:36:55 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2008 ALWIL Software.

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to