-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: April 19, 2008 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Economist Fears Historic Loss of Assets for Minorities


Economist Fears Historic Loss of Assets for Minorities

By Sandip Roy
New American Media.
April 19, 2008
http://www.alternet.org/story/82629/

Editor's Note: The current economic downturn could lead
to the greatest loss of assets for communities of color
that's ever happened, says Alan Fisher, executive
director of the California Reinvestment Coalition since
1992, which advocates for the right of low-income
communities and communities of color to have fair and
equal access to banking and other financial services.
Alan Fisher was interviewed by NAM Editor and host of
UpFront, Sandip Roy.

--- Whether we call it a recession or not, what's the
effect of what's happening in the economy on the low-
income communities who are part of your coalition?

I think low-income people and people of color have been struggling for many
years now. The "recovery" has not helped them. Recent reports say that
income levels for families are the same dollar-wise as they were in 2000,
which means they are worth much less now. Food prices are going up, gas
prices are going up and we have a huge housing crisis.

--- How many people are impacted by the housing crisis?

The housing crisis doesn't just impact those who are in
the homes that are in trouble -- who in California may
be half a million households -- but it impacts all of
their neighbors and their city. Their neighbors' houses
lose value, as their houses lose value. The cities are
losing tax base, our whole state has been relying on
home sales to keep going. The state says it has an $18
billion deficit in a fiscal year that ends June 30. I
think we are in a deep crisis and whatever the
economists may call it, regular people are suffering
and having great difficulty.

--- Can you give an example of how regular people are
suffering and what are the first signs of recession in
these communities?

I think the signs of recession are people having to cut
back on the basic things that they buy, on less meat,
not being able to buy clothes for their children -- but
much of this has been masked because of easy access to
credit cards. Many people are in huge debt on their
credit cards and have substituted those, or have taken
out payday loans, to try to keep going. So, it's a
dangerous situation that's been masked by the wealth of
the most wealthy -- corporate profits -- while the
people who are our neighbors are in tremendous trouble.

--- But wouldn't something like a recession rip this 
mask off, with the way people have been relying on 
credit cards and payday lenders to get by?

I think, whether we call it a recession or not, that it
would be something that happens as people are unable to
pay their credit card bills, as people are being forced
to go into bankruptcy. With the new bankruptcy laws,
it's even more punitive. Yet at the same time
bankruptcies are going up.

Homelessness is also on the rise. There are many people
who are tenants in homes, and if those homes are
foreclosed on, then, even though they pay their rent
every month, they are forced out. They don't get their
security deposit back, and where do they go to look for housing? Rental
prices are going up, so it's a tremendous squeeze on families.

 --- There has been so much coverage of
homeowners, butwe haven't seen much on what has been 
the impact of the economic downturn on tenants.

I think we are just beginning to hear that. It's sort
of hidden because you don't see it in the same
aggregated fashion. We know it's happening; we're
hearing it more and more. We're hearing from homeless organizations that
it's impacting folks that are becoming homeless, but there are no numbers at
this point that I know of.

--- Are you seeing a new profile of homeless people? Are 
homeless organizations reporting on new kinds of people 
who are becoming homeless and are coming to them for help?

I think it's just starting, so I haven't heard that
yet. I've heard concerns about tenants and we've tried
to get state legislature to do something about tenants,
but the opposition from the mortgage industry and the
bankers pushed it out of the bill.

--- Why are the mortgage industries opposing measures 
about tenants?

Because they want the houses, they want people out
immediately, and they want to try to sell them again
and recoup their money. As you can see from the Bear
Stearns rescue, the concern is about the corporations
at the federal level because of campaign financing. So
no one cares that people are being forced out of their
homes because these people aren't the big contributors;
they might be written off as not even voting.

--- Where else would you be looking for to see the 
cracks, the great pressures that communities are going 
to be subjected to as result of the downturn?

What's caught my eye is that the city of Vallejo,
Calif. almost went bankrupt, and it's still on the edge
of that. They went bankrupt because they were paying
their workers a decent wage. The governor took away the
vehicle tax money when he first came into office, which
meant that police and fire -- the most basic things
that every city needs to have -- got cut.

You hear about libraries that are being closed down.
They're talking about closing the parks; education and
health care are being cut back by the governor. I think
it's the whole infrastructure of society that's under
attack. In a way, it's so large that it's hard for
people even to take in what it means.

With the foreclosure crisis, for example, I've heard
that one of the interesting things was that it was
affecting both African-American communities and Latino communities really
hard, but in different ways. African Americans were being affected mostly
because they were existing homeowners who had refinanced their homes, not
understanding the terms. For Latinos it was more of a language issue.
First-time buyers had locked themselves into mortgages that they were not
going to be able to pay. The results were the same -- both of them were
losing homes -- but the way they were getting there was different. In cases
of the economic downturn and recession, do you see that affecting different
communities differently?

I think, as you are saying, the reasons for things may
be different. The Asian-American and Pacific-Islander
community -- the Korean Americans and Vietnamese
Americans may be coming to home ownership later, like
Latinos. It will have a broad impact, but I think each community is
different in how it's going on.

But I know it's generally agreed that there's
tremendous concern that this could be the greatest loss
of assets for communities of color that's ever
happened. We've all seen an increase in home ownership,
but it was filled with fraud and greed on the part of
the real estate industry and so people are in trouble
now.

--- These communities are also reliant on payday lenders, 
especially poor communities, and I know your
organization studies that. Have you seen any spike in
payday lender abuse as a result of this downturn?

One of the difficulties with all of the statistics is
that they're late. So, all we know about really is last
year and that doesn't show a huge increase. But we are
hearing that people are increasingly going to payday
lenders, which are the lenders of last resort. We have
a bill that we hope can make it through the
legislature, to cap their interest rates.

--- The Federal Reserve has been taking some steps to 
avoid foreclosures; the state government is doing 
something. How would you grade their efforts?

I think the state government, the Federal Reserve, the
federal legislature, the federal government are all
making efforts that will have no large impact on the
homeowner. Clearly, the federal government and the
Federal Reserve had looked at large corporations and
are concerned about that infrastructure. The
predictions, which are probably very low, are that two
million people could lose their homes. There's nothing
that's comparable to that and many of the bills that
would have really made a difference have been cut back
in the legislature. There was an effort to try and
soften the impact of bankruptcy on people, and that was
soundly defeated by the corporate interests. There's
been nothing that really can help people, and meanwhile thousands of people
are losing their homes every week. __________

Sandip Roy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is host of
"Upfront," the Pacific News Service weekly radio
program on KALW-FM, San Francisco.

(c) 2008 New American Media All rights reserved.

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to