Hm. Now do I reply  cnfirming I only sent it once, and risk eight  
copies of it going out, or  do I  not reply at all and  risk people  
thinking I sent out eight copies of it?  tr
On 30-Mar-09, at 6:23 PM, M.Blackmore wrote:

> You may not post much to the list but I got 8 copies of it... did  
> anyone
> else get multiple copies or is it my mail service playing silly b's?
>
>
> On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 12:37 -0400, tim rourke wrote:
>> Hello all;
>>
>> I do not  post much to this list, but it is time to say some things.
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. There is no such thing as a free market. All markets are
>> regulated, all economies must be administered.
>>
>> 2. Depressions happen when  economies  are so misadministered that
>> people lose confidence in them.
>>
>> 3. The basic problem with any capitalist economy is that it requires
>> constant growth or it collapses. Since the world is finite,
>> inevitably the money system collapses.
>>
>> 4. There are people who might want to work 25 hours a day to satisfy
>> some sort of drives, but there is nothing to be done to keep them
>> busy 25 hours a day.
>>
>> 5. To repeat again, the world is finite. There is only so much of
>> anything to go around. Any economic theorizing that does not start
>> from there is bogus.
>>
>> 6. The deeper cause of the  present economic  malaise is that the
>> economic systems of the  world have overshot the carrying capacity
>> of  the world by a factor of about 1.4 or 1.5 .  Total throughput
>> must be rationalized globally according to the sustainable capacity
>> of the land base, and   realistic human needs.
>>
>> 7. Some way must be found of running an economy on a steady state
>> basis, without interest charges.
>>
>> tr
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 27-Mar-09, at 3:28 PM, Harry Pollard wrote:
>>
>>> Ed,
>>>
>>> Well put together article, but it suffers from the usual  
>>> problems. It
>>> is written as if land does not exist. Yet, there can be no  
>>> production
>>> without access to land. And if land prices become too high,  
>>> production
>>> stops.
>>>
>>> Sen wrote:
>>>
>>> “Certainly, the cumulative downturn we are observing right now,
>>> which is edging us closer to a depression, has clear Keynesian
>>> features; the reduced incomes of one group of persons has led to
>>> reduced purchases by them, in turn causing a further reduction in  
>>> the
>>> income of others.”
>>>
>>> Georgists would immediately ask "Why are there 'reduced incomes  
>>> of one
>>> group'?"
>>>
>>> George argued that depressions are not caused by overproduction, nor
>>> are they caused by under consumption (everyone's favorite). Rather,
>>> said George, they are caused by under production. People cannot find
>>> jobs, which means they can't buy -- underconsumption. This means the
>>> shelves aren't cleared -- obvious evidence of overproduction
>>>
>>> So, why can't they find jobs?
>>>
>>> You may recall the first assumption of Classical Political Economy
>>> period. It is: "Man's desires are unlimited."
>>>
>>> If we worked 25 hours a day, we could never satisfy unlimited  
>>> desires.
>>>
>>> So, why it's so hard to find a job?
>>>
>>> In a free market economy, businesses succeed and fail all the time.
>>> People fall out of work and get new jobs continually. But what  
>>> happens
>>> if new jobs dry up because increasing land costs dampen the  
>>> supply of
>>> new businesses? "Underproduction" is with us -- a condition, which
>>> leads to apparent underconsumption and overproduction.
>>>
>>> The free market requires fresh supplies to come to market in  
>>> response
>>> to price increases. These return prices to equilibrium. New land
>>> cannot come to market in response to increasing price. Under  
>>> pressure
>>> of increasing demand, prices keep rising, as they try to draw more
>>> land to market.
>>>
>>> As Will Rogers said: "They ain't making no more dirt." Further, you
>>> can't move land to market to bring prices. So, in a normal economy,
>>> land prices are always pushing the envelope. As I've said, at that
>>> point, any "trigger" can set off a depression.
>>>
>>> This should be separated from the land bubble (for heaven's sake,  
>>> not
>>> a housing bubble). It is probable that 'bubbles' don't do much
>>> economic harm. When the 'exuberance' has abated, some will have won,
>>> others will have lost.
>>>
>>> While the producer of a Beanie Babies walks away with $1 billion,
>>> others may have garages packed tight with unsellable Babies.
>>>
>>> Of course, in the present case it didn't help much that the Bush
>>> administration was deliberately forcing lower interest rates,  
>>> even as
>>> the Democratic Congress was encouraging Fanny and Freddie to lend
>>> billions to people who were poor risks. Nor did it help that Wall
>>> Street was effectively hiding this suspect paper in packages that  
>>> they
>>> sold around the world.
>>>
>>> Needless to say, all this nonsense is supposed to be evidence  
>>> that the
>>> free market has failed.
>>>
>>> Bah!
>>>
>>> Harry
>>>
>>> ******************************
>>> Henry George School of Los Angeles
>>> Box 655  Tujunga  CA  91043
>>> Tel: 818 352-4141
>>> ******************************
>>>
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of one  
>>> Weick
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 6:00 AM
>>> To: [email protected]; futurework
>>> Subject: [Futurework] Sen on Keynes and Pigou
>>>
>>> Good discussion of the current implications of Keynesian and  
>>> Pigovian
>>> economics by Amartya Sen in the current New York Review of Books.
>>> Took me way back to when the world was green (or purple or  
>>> whatever).
>>>
>>> It's at http://www.nybooks.com/articles/22490 .
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Futurework mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Futurework mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to