Arthur,

At 17:19 26/10/2009 -0400, you wrote:
       Few trends could so thoroughly undermine the very foundations
       of our free society as the acceptance by corporate officials of
       a social responsibility other than to make as much money for
       their stockholders as possible.     -- Milton Friedman

It's the function of the corp. to make profits and pay taxes, it's the
function of the govt. to set the ground rules of the game and use the taxes
to meet social needs.  Govts are elected; corporations are not. When corps
begin to decide  "social responsibility" then clearly they may have their
own unelected agenda.  When I buy Proctor and Gamble or Kellogs or Kraft
products I really don't want them deciding social responsibility.  Just turn
out a quality product, pay taxes and treat the workers in a fair manner.
The govt. can and should do the rest.  So I agree with Milton.

Milton Friedman was right, insofar as he went in his analysis of corporations and a "free society". But he didn't go far enough because he entirely overlooked one of the principal reasons for the rapid take-off of the "free society" -- namely the limited liability corporation. In allowing these to develop legally in the early 19th century, Western governments insisted on public access (mainly in the interests of company shareholders in those days) to annual corporate accounts as a quid pro quo. Since then, shareholders have become stakeholders -- that is, all of us -- and annual accounts are plainly too infrequent (and opaque, sometimes fictional) in fast-changing times.

What happened also during the rest of the 19th century and all through the 20th is that the most ambitious young men increasingly sought careers in business and the most talented young men in scientific research (both of these being closely associated in the case of the larger corporations). From then onwards, politicians and civil servants began to lose the plot -- as Ed Weick observed from his own experience -- and corporations, not governments, increasingly make the most important economic decisions (both for good and ill). And these, increasingly, are decisions with world-wide consequences, not just national.

Note, however, that governance still has validity. Corporations, as well as individual citizens, still need a framework of just laws. We must also note that, by and large, business is leaving the robber baron phase behind and that corporate leaders increasingly reflect the values of the age, even though there are still get-rich-quickers and criminals among them. Also, even though governments have fallen down on the task of exposing the financial dealings of corporations and banks, financial specialists and journalists have been increasingly discerning.

A big drama is now being played out -- a huge re-balancing of governmental power as between major social components (including specialized pressure groups as well as business corporations). What's going on now between elected governments and corporations is equivalent to the re-balancing that took place in Western Europe from 1648 (Peace of Westphalia) and onwards when secular governments took over from religious government.

Keith


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Spencer
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 12:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Futurework] Re: Well, it's a nice thought...


> University of Ottawa MBAs swear oath in Canadian first
>
> by Glen Mcgregor, The Ottawa Citizen, October 26, 2009
>
> OTTAWA: About two dozen masters of business administration graduates
> stood together Sunday and recited an oath of ethics....  to conduct
> their affairs ethically and work toward the well-being of all
> stakeholders and not just their shareholders.

Beth David Cemetary on line two, something about seismic activity and
steam ventng around some grave or other, something Friedman I think
they said.

> The oath is entirely voluntarily and in no way binding on anyone who
> takes it.

Oh, well.  That's alright then.  No smiting off of hands or heaping
with burning coals or forensic audits or anything like that. No
problem.


-Imafa Kinasso, Epist. Eng., MBA
 Scotia Center for Advanced Monetary Studies

---
       Few trends could so thoroughly undermine the very foundations
       of our free society as the acceptance by corporate officials of
       a social responsibility other than to make as much money for
       their stockholders as possible.     -- Milton Friedman
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Keith Hudson, Bath, England, <www.evolutionary-economics.org>, <<http://www.amazon.com/dp/1906557020/>www.amazon.com/dp/1906557020<http://www.amazon.com/dp/1906557020/>/>, <www.handlo.com>
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to