NY Times

 

November 27, 2009

China Seen Facing Protectionist Backlash Next Year 

By REUTERS

BEIJING — China faces a protectionist backlash next year because its
manufacturers are saddled with overcapacity and are disposing of its excess
output on world markets, the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China
said Thursday.

Jörg Wuttke, the head of the business group, said it would take about 12
months to prepare a case alleging dumping, the practice of selling goods for
less than it costs to produce them.

“This lead time would indicate to me that in the second half of 2010, there
will be far more dumping cases against China, unfortunately,” Mr. Wuttke
said.

He was speaking at the introduction of a study into industrial overcapacity
in China, a longstanding situation that the chamber believes has grown more
serious as a result of the global financial meltdown and Beijing’s
aggressive response to it.

“The crisis has throttled demand for exports from China at a time when even
more investment, in the form of the Chinese government’s massive stimulus
package, is being pumped into building new plants and adding unnecessary
capacity,” the report said.

“As a result, the problem is actually getting worse in many industries,” it
said.

In a survey of the chamber’s members, 56 percent of respondents identified
local government policies aimed at luring investment as the main
macroeconomic reason for overcapacity; loose lending was the second most
frequently cited cause.

Mr. Wuttke welcomed efforts by the central government to curb new capacity
but said it was often powerless in the face of local governments that craved
new factories for the tax revenue and jobs they could generate and that have
done everything to keep existing plants from going under.

“Local protectionism kicks in,” Mr. Wuttke said. “So even if Beijing sees a
problem and wants to tackle it, they are very often derailed by local
politics.”

Apart from generating trade friction, rampant overcapacity would weigh on
foreign direct investment into China. 

“Why would you invest if that market is already oversupplied?” he asked.

By wasting resources and eroding profits, overcapacity deters research and
development and encourages companies to cut corners on health and safety
standards as well as environmental protection.

Further, the creation of unneeded capacity raises the risk of nonperforming
loans for banks that finance the investment. It also generates trade tension
as producers sell their surplus production overseas at cut-rate prices, the
study said.

The State Council, China’s cabinet, recently singled out the iron and steel,
cement, electrolytic aluminum, glass, coal, chemical, polysilicon and wind
power equipment sectors as the worst offenders when it came to overcapacity
and announced steps to rein in their expansion.

The chamber applauded the cabinet’s actions but said the fundamental answer
was to shift from investment-led and export-led growth and to focus more on
domestic consumption and services.

The report made a series of recommendations that amounted to a
root-and-branch overhaul of China’s economic model. 

The recommendations included the redistribution of national income from
companies to households. It said state-owned enterprises should disgorge
dividends for the government to spend on social security, health and
education instead of plowing profits back into fresh investment.

It also recommended a sharp reduction in corporate capital expenditure in
coming years.

In addition, the report said that China should remove subsidies for energy
and other inputs, which are provided indirectly by households. Claiming that
the manufacturing sector has become addicted to these subsidies, it
recommended increasing resource and environmental charges.

Reuters

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to