This oil spill is a typical example of how the "environmentalist" billionaires
COULD have used their money (for safety valve, recovery plans etc.) IF they
really WERE environmentalists -- but they didn't.  Instead, they profited
from the polluter industry, perhaps even in the drastic way described below.
And their puppet Obama saw to it that the regulations on oil rig safety were
abolished, à la "Free" Trade!

Chris



http://pesn.com/2010/05/05/9501645_No_joke--Goldman_Sachs_shorted_TransOcean/


No joke: Goldman Sachs shorted Gulf of Mexico

It turns out that Goldman Sachs really did place shorts on TransOcean stock
days before the explosions rocked the rig in the Gulf of Mexico sending
stocks plunging while GS profits soared -- benefitting once again from a
huge disaster, having done the same with airline stocks prior to 911 then
again with the housing bubble.

by Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News

On Apr. 30, the Huffington Post published a story stating:

    In what is looming as another public relations predicament for Goldman
Sachs, the banking giant admitted today that it made "a substantial
financial bet against the Gulf of Mexico" one day before the sinking of an
oil rig in that body of water.

    The new revelations came to light after government investigators turned
up new emails from Goldman employee Fabrice "Fabulous Fab" Tourre in which
he bragged to a girlfriend that the firm was taking a "big short" position
on the Gulf.

    "One oil rig goes down and we're going to be rolling in dough," Mr.
Tourre wrote in one email. "Suck it, fishies and birdies!"




Not being aware that the author, Andy Borowitz, is a comedian, scores of
Internet sites ran with the story as being genuine. As of today, Google
search on <Goldman Sachs shorted "Gulf of Mexico"> pulls up 207,000
returns, beginning with the Huffington Post link. Many, such as Infowars,
pulled their stories when they realized the mistake.

Christopher Rudy noted:

    The news about Goldman's bet against the Gulf comes on the heels of
embarrassing revelations that the firm had taken a short position on the
housing bubble, profiting from economic collapse, followed by more billions
in government bailout support that paid out a couple billion in bonuses to
thousands of loyal Goldman "officers" (corporate stakeholders).

    We shouldn't be surprised. The owners of Goldman Sachs are the same
Rothchilds co-owners of the privately held Federal Reserve Banking System,
and they know how to play this game. Watch how Congress capitulates to Wall
Street losses that the lap-dog press attributes to "bankster bashing".

Goldman Sachs just settled with the SEC for $450,000 (one guy's salary for
a month; or the price of one nicer home lost, among millions due to the
collapse) as punishment for shorting the mortgage balloon. (Ref.) They made
billions in the crime.

StreetInsider.com reported on April 30 in their "Top 10" recap for that week:

    Shares of Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) fell about 7% this week as execs
were grilled on Capitol Hill and then, later in the week, the SEC referred
its fraud case against the firm to the Justice Department for possible
criminal prosecution. While much of Wall Street cheered Lloyd Blankfein's
snappy responses to an onslaught of questions, Main Street rejoiced as Carl
Levin "stumped" other execs with "meaningful" interrogation tactics aimed
at exposing the corruption within the US financial industry.

You can certainly see why people would be quick to believe the comedian's
satire piece about Goldman Sach's shorting the Gulf of Mexico.

However, just because his piece was satire, doesn't mean there isn't
something to it. The reason humor is funny is because it lampoons reality,
providing an exaggerative and simplified caricature to bring out the key
issues in a non-threatening way. Historically, especially in times of heavy
oppression, the best truth tellers have been the comedians. Benjamin
Franklin certainly used humor to his advantage in helping to win America's
Independence.

A. True Ott, Ph.D., wrote the following to me last night:

    I have confirmed that there were indeed numerous "shorts" placed on
TransOcean stock just days before the "problem". Was it Goldman Sachs? That
is yet to be conclusively determined (there is indeed a SEC investigation
ongoing) -- but labeling something as "satire" is a lawyer's shrewd trick
to keep from being sued for slander -- even if it is all true. Moreover,
there were massive shorts placed literally seconds after the news hit the
airwaves.

    Who would dare to quote the actual e-mails from "Fabulous Fab", unless
the writer would post them as a "satire" - especially after what happened
to the Wall Street Journal writers who dared expose the 9-11 short sales
involving Goldman Sachs. (They were assigned to Afghanistan, and had fatal
"accidents" there.)

Dr. Ott has subsequently confirmed from two sources that Goldman Sachs was
indeed in on the shorts being placed on TransOcean stock. (See Email from
Don Nicoloff documenting Goldman Sachs short puts on TransOcean stock.)
And he has confirmed that the comedian was aware of that as well.

Dr. Ott had me and Paul Noel on his two-hour radio show yesterday talking
about the viral article we posted, "Mother of All Gushers Could Kill
Earth's Oceans".

In response to the alleged Goldman Sach's shorting story, Paul, who is an
expert on the Gulf Oil subject, provided the following intelligence:

    There is a reason they could have known the rig was going to fail up to
two weeks ahead of its failure. The nature of these wells is that they
leave the drill mud in the well and compress using very heavy drill mud to
keep the well from blowing up unlimited. The well would begin to bump
(similar to boiling a big bubble) and the acoustic signals would tell the
rig was in trouble that far ahead. Goldman Sacks could just have had inside
info. They also know the scale of things. This is the best explanation. It
could be otherwise.

    If you were going to sabotage a drilling team, all you would have to do
is load a lighter mud in the mix as they pulled a drill pipe. .... There
are lots of ways to have this happen either accidentally or deliberately.
Goldman teams are great on statistical stuff sort of like the odds of
rolling dice. They might just have figured stats for probability of a
failure.??? Of course we could surmise other reasons are possible.

In our interview with Dr. Ott yesterday, both Paul and myself pointed to
the magnitude of this disaster as hopefully a death knell to the oil
industry, spurring people to finally provide the support needed to get the
myriad of free/renewable energy technologiesthat have been languishing into
the marketplace. These would not only be much cleaner than oil, without the
huge environmental consequences and risks, but in many cases they could be
cheaper than fossil-based energy; and many of them provide distributed
capability removing the need for a central grid.

This revelation about those with insider knowledge in fact shorting the
TransOcean stock prior to the explosions, will hopefully also spell the
beginning of the end of the ultra corrupt financial faction who have
wrested control over the worlds financial organs. Their days are numbered
as they show their true colors in the midst of an increasingly enlightened
populace who will not continue to take their abuses. These ultra power and
wealth addicts need to be humbled by serving time in prison with common
criminals who will not give them privileged treatment. A bullet or lethal
injection would be far too merciful and dignified.

Do we have a shred of clean justice left in our corrupt government system
which has been bought out, blackmailed, threatened, or otherwise brought
under the control of these New World Order manipulators?

It's a dark day in which we live. But I am confident that brighter days are
ahead. This time of transition is going to be a wild ride.




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword
"igve".



_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to