Personally, I don't think currency is the issue, nor do I think that an 
international currency would resolve it.  We already have real or defacto 
international currencies, the U$ dollar and the Euro and we also have gold, yet 
the problems continue to mount. 

The real problem seems to have two key aspects to it.  One is that economies, 
especially advanced economies,  have extended their consumption far beyond 
their ability to produce and thus rely on 'bailouts', whatever their form, to 
keep doing what they are doing.  The US, for example, relies heavily on China 
to leverage its fiscal debt.  Banks have relied heavily on the taxpayer to bail 
them out. The other part of the problem is compounding uncertainty around the 
question of how long economies and their key institutions can keep doing what 
they are doing, consuming more than they are producing, and relying on others 
to bail them out.  There has to be an end-point and it's probably not too far 
away.

Ed
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Keith Hudson 
  To: Harry Pollard ; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION' 
  Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 6:24 AM
  Subject: Re: [Futurework] [Ottawadissenters] Re: Sound money


  Harry,

  At 22:52 31/05/2010 -0700, you wrote:

    Ed
    I doubt that 'sound money' is possible without an external policeman such 
as being tied to the gold market -- or some other commodity.
    Free market exchange rates indicate the health of an economy. If Greece 
were not a Euro country, its exchange rate would have told everyone that it is 
in trouble.
    Managed exchange rates lose this worthwhile advantage as you suggest.

    Harry

  In effect, what is going on now is a battle between the US$ and the price of 
gold. But unlike the huge spike and crash of gold in 1980, the central banks 
have been unable to prevent the rise in gold price in recent years. Instead of 
selling their gold (to bring the price down) they have kept hold of it for 
their foreign exchange reserves (obviously no longer confident in their own 
currencies). Nowadays they seem to be able to temporarily check any incipient 
surges at psychologically important prices ($1150, $1200, $1250, etc -- as tend 
to be used by options traders) in the hope that this will cause a proper 
downturn. But this (at the present time of extreme uncertainty in the currency 
market -- dollar versus euro) is unlikely unless the US can somehow rescue the 
European Monetary Union and stop the slide of the euro.

  Gold is being increasingly bought by hedge funds and others who want to 
safeguard themselves from currency chaos and defaulting governments. The longer 
that the Fed and Western central banks try to disparage gold the more that it 
will become the world currency by default.

  Keith
   

    From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
    Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 2:15 PM
    To: RE-DESIGNING WORK,INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION; Keith Hudson
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: [Ottawadissenters] Re: [Futurework] Sound money

    I'm sure sound money, and soundly managed money, can be achieved without 
reverting to the gold standard and I don't think a single world currency is 
possible or desirable without some kind of global super government that can 
dictate how individual countries should behave fiscally and economically.  
Otherwise, the same kinds of problems will emerge as are current in the EU with 
its common currency but very different fiscal and economic behaviour from 
member to member.  And how many countries would buy into a common 
super-governmental system?  Not very many, and certainly not the major global 
players.

    The instability of currencies is one problem, debt is another and perhaps a 
much larger one.  Large sovereign debts have been accumulated in various ways 
-- the need to fight wars (to spread freedom and democracy, for example) and 
most recently to bail out banks and keep economies afloat.  Large corporate 
debts have resulted from changes in globalized trade patterns, and large 
consumer debts have arisen because people feel they are entitled to more than 
they can afford.  Until something is done about debt the global economy can't 
move forward much faster than a snail's pace, if it moves forward at all.

    Meanwhile, problems lurk in the shadows.  Unemployment is high, populations 
are aging, and inevitable resource scarcities loom.  

    Ed 
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Keith Hudson 
      To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, ,EDUCATION 
      Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 3:09 AM 
      Subject: [Futurework] Sound money 
       
      The following is a superb article from yesterday's WSJ. Judy Shelton's 
discussion takes us only halfway there, however. If the US States-led campaign 
succeeds in re-establishing the US$ against gold then there is the further 
danger that in trying to stabilize the dollar the price might be fixed either 
too high or two low. If the price is pitched too high then the home population 
suffers from continuing recession. If too low, then it will be regarded as 
predatory inflation by other countries and invites reprisals. 
      If, however, a new world currency is established (such as proposed by 
China, Russia, Middle East countries) and fixed against gold (or some other 
important commodity), then individual national currencies, left free from 
government control, means that individual governments will then have to impose 
discipline on themselves. This they are unable to do at present because there's 
such an easy recourse to printing money (Quantitative Easing). When the present 
crisis affecting all Western countries comes to a head -- as it surely must 
before too long -- then this will be the only solution left. 
      Keith 



      The recovery starts with sound money



      By Judy Shelton 
      The Wall Street Journal 
      Thursday, May 27, 2010 
      The euro is beset with fiscal calamities that threaten its downfall, and 
markets in the U.S. are roiled by uncertainty over the government's financial 
regulatory legislation. But don't worry. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner 
meets with European finance officials today to discuss the economic situation. 
      According to a Treasury Department statement, they will focus on 
"measures being taken to restore global confidence and financial stability." So 
everything is under control. 
      Right. 
      What government policy makers in the U.S. and Europe fail to realize is 
that far from being seen as capable of delivering economic salvation, they are 
increasingly perceived as primary contributors to global financial ruin. 
Whether it's the fiscal recklessness of spendthrift politicians or the refusal 
of government officials to acknowledge failings -- distorting mortgage markets 
through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, skewing assessments of credit risk through 
loose monetary policy -- the influence of government over the real economy is 
proving disastrous. 
      No wonder people are flocking to gold as they flee government-supplied 
money. Neither the dollar nor the euro inspires much global confidence; despite 
the dollar's relative safe-haven status, neither currency holds out the promise 
of financial stability. 
      How can the real economy, i.e., the private sector, where genuine wealth 
is actually produced, continue to function in the absence of reliable money? 
Europeans will be wary of the euro from now on, given that the European Central 
Bank has relaxed its standards for safeguarding monetary integrity by absorbing 
Greek debt. Meanwhile, the perilous fiscal condition of the U.S. has convinced 
many that our government will resort to future inflation to reduce its own 
untenable debt burden. 
      It's hard to see how economic recovery can proceed when citizens suspect 
that the monetary foundation beneath them is crumbling away. The willingness to 
work and sacrifice for the sake of future prosperity is a universal human 
quality -- the hallmark of entrepreneurial faith -- but people must believe 
there is a link between effort and reward. Money forges that link by providing 
a dependable store of value; in doing so, it performs a vital social function. 
      The private sector is fully capable of recovering from economic downturn 
if individuals have a meaningful tool of measurement for evaluating alternative 
choices in a competitive environment. Comparisons based on accurate, 
free-market price signals yield optimal economic outcomes. But what we are 
witnessing today is a clash between the real economy's will to resurrect itself 
and the persistent failure of government, here and abroad, to deliver an 
appropriate platform of sound money based on sound finances. 
      Even as the first inklings of rebounding growth can be discerned -- 
increased retail sales, higher corporate profits -- it takes only the latest 
headline about government failure to come to grips with deficit spending and 
accumulating sovereign debt to snuff out any potential market rally. Pledges to 
achieve balanced budgets by some distant future date do little to convince 
people that anything has really changed. 
      Tough rules to enforce fiscal discipline were part of the original plan 
for persuading Europeans to abandon national monies in favor of adopting a 
common currency. Limits on deficit spending and government debt were clearly 
stipulated in the Stability and Growth Pact -- no more than a 3% budget 
deficit, maximum debt equal to 60% of GDP. But these criteria were quietly 
jettisoned years ago and have now been flagrantly breached en masse by European 
nations responding to the financial crisis with bailout packages and fiscal 
stimulus. 
      In the U.S., frustrations over Washington's seeming inability to resist 
fiscal profligacy have found voice in the tea party movement. As national 
sentiment grows in favor of limited government and constrained powers, 
legislation has been introduced in nine states to nullify federal legal tender 
laws; the Fed's monopoly on supplying the money U.S. citizens must use is being 
challenged by authorizing payment in gold and silver. 
      Invoking the 10th Amendment strictures of the Constitution, proponents 
argue that the Founding Fathers never intended to grant federal government both 
the right to borrow money as well as the power to manipulate the value of the 
monetary unit of account. Money linked to gold and silver retains its value, 
which prevents the medium of exchange from falling victim to the federal 
government's inherent conflict of interest if it can fund its own debt with 
money created from thin air. Updated for our times, a number of the legal 
tender proposals specify that citizens would be allowed to tap electronic 
exchange-traded funds (ETFs) backed 100% by gold or silver to conduct digital 
transactions with state government. 
      The idea of rising above the administrative dictates of fallible 
government to reclaim the virtues of sound money is profoundly liberating -- 
and could prove economically empowering. Who believes that officials in 
Brussels or Frankfurt will safeguard the value of euro-denominated savings in 
the face of political pressures? Who expects the "Financial Stability Oversight 
Council," led by the Treasury secretary as prescribed in the regulatory 
overhaul bill, to spot the next asset bubble before it ruptures with 
catastrophic financial consequences for American retirement accounts? 
      The transition to a firmer monetary footing to support entrepreneurial 
capitalism could be initiated by linking major global reserve currencies to 
gold and silver -- commodities long associated with monetary functions. It 
would logically begin with the dollar. As a first step, U.S. citizens could ask 
Congress to authorize the limited issuance of gold-backed Treasury bonds that 
would provide for payment of principal at maturity in either ounces of gold or 
the face value of the security, at the option of the holder. 
      The level of public confidence in fiat dollar obligations versus gold 
would be revealed through auction bidding, with yield spreads clearly 
reflecting aggregate expectations of their comparative values. In the same way 
that inflation-indexed Treasury bonds measure expectations about future changes 
in the Consumer Price Index, gold-backed Treasury bonds would provide a 
barometer of the Fed's credibility. 
      By linking the dollar to gold, Americans would establish a vital 
beachhead for sound money and provide a model that other nations could emulate. 
      ----- 
      Ms. Shelton, author of "Money Meltdown" (Free Press, 1994), is a senior 
fellow at the Atlas Economic Research Foundation and co-director of the Atlas 
Sound Money Project. 

      _______________________________________________ 
  Keith Hudson, Saltford, England 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Futurework mailing list
  [email protected]
  https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to