Yes Sally, that's true but my problem is this.   Once all of the ideas are
in, there is not a single society that comes from it that I would give the
remainder of my life to live in and that's a fact.  Perhaps I've learned why
I came here in the first place and that's enough.    All the world is not a
university but it is a school.

REH

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sally Lerner
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 4:04 PM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION; 'Keith Hudson'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] FW: [ PFIR ] How to Make an American Job Before
It's Too Late: Andy Grove

Yes, thanks to Arthur for the Grove article.  Never mind what Grove calls a
solution - as Arthur says, we in the
'developed' countries' better start asking some fundamental questions about
how our economic system works.
Time to stop castigating the Chinese for being such poor consumers (i.e.
they save their money rather than go
into debt buying stuff) and start coming up with better ideas for economic
arrangements that put the economy
where it belongs: in the service of human welfare and the environment.

Thanks again, Arthur, for reminding FWers what the list was all about to
begin with.  Sally
________________________________________
From: [email protected]
[[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
[[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 10:50 AM
To: 'Keith Hudson'; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,    EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] FW: [ PFIR ] How to Make an American Job Before
It's Too Late: Andy Grove

I think that Grove was giving an example of the way in which capitalism can
lead individuals to seek short term gains without considering longer term
outcomes or costs.  Or as Lenin said,

"The Capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them."


by:

Vladimir Ilyich
Lenin<http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quotes_by/vladimir+ilyich+lenin>
[Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov] (1870 - 1924), First Leader of the Soviet Union


The article contains other things which you skipped over.  The extent to
which venture capitalists routinely include the need to have investment in
China as part of any investment.  True, it might be that Chinese workers
will increase wages, join unions and "join the developed world", but for the
moment the Chinese govt is doing quite well by skirting environmental and
labour laws , controlling their currency and playing to the investor's
desire and greed for bottom line results.  That our govts allow and
encourage this will only lead to short and perhaps longer term political
disruption in western countries.

I think that Grove is telling it like it is.  Perhaps his remedy is a bit
stark and clumsy but his diagnosis seems to be correct.  We can wait it out
and see what happens or we can slow down the process in such a way that our
own workers are able to make the transition in such a way that dignity and
jobs are maintained.

We are at a serious juncture point and it is difficult to be sanguine about
outcomes, but it seems that a national dialogue is needed on what is going
on and the costs and benefits from the current course of action.

Arthur



From: Keith Hudson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 2:43 AM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION; Arthur Cordell
Subject: Re: [Futurework] FW: [ PFIR ] How to Make an American Job Before
It's Too Late: Andy Grove

Arthur,

At 17:07 02/07/2010 -0400, you wrote:

"How to Make an American Job Before It's Too Late:" Andy Grove
http://bit.ly/9bJfNW

The Bloomberg article by Andy Grove is well worth reading. There are few
people in the world with his vast lifetime experience of the IT industry,
and one can understand, and sympathize with, his personal anguish that his
own industry has been affected so egregiously.

His diagnosis of the lost jobs in that industry (those that have now gone to
China) is superb. Unfortunately, his solution (high tariffs against Chinese
products) is fallacious.

What he says is: "We should develop a system of financial incentives: Levy
an extra tax on the product of offshored labor. (If the result is a trade
war, treat it like other wars -- fight to win.) Keep that money separate.
Deposit it in the coffers of what we might call the Scaling Bank of the U.S.
and make these sums available to companies that will scale their American
operations. Such a system would be a daily reminder that while pursuing our
company goals, all of us in business have a responsibility to maintain the
industrial base on which we depend and the society whose adaptability -- and
stability -- we may have taken for granted."

For one thing, Andy Grove has forgotten that the customer is king. When I
worked in the automotive industry in Coventry 45 years ago, the car workers
in the many factories there strongly supported the Labour government's
constant pleas, "Buy British". They supported the idea emotionally, even
politically at election times. But, in fact, the number of Japanese cars in
the factories' own workers' car parks rose and rose. In practice, Coventry
car workers would buy products of others -- if they were cheaper -- rather
than their own even at the risk of damaging their own employers. (Eight
large automotive factories did, in fact, go belly-up in the next 10-15
years.)

If America applied high tariffs against Chinese goods, what would happen? On
the one hand, the cost of living of the average American consumer would go
up. So much for any government's ideas of getting consumer spending going
again!  Consumers may be mute most of the time but they're far more numerous
than those workers and employers who clamorously seek protection and, in the
end, the cheque-book of the consumer is more decisive.

On the other hand, Chinese industry, with smaller markets for their goods in
America, would all the more seek consumer markets elsewhere.

That would be particularly dangerous for America at the present time. The
American market for Chinese goods is only about 14% of the total annual
exports from China. The potential markets for Chinese goods in south-east
Asia, Africa and South America (Brazil particularly) are huge and they've
hardly begun to be exploited yet.

And there's one big fact that Andy Grove chose not to mention. This is that
about half of the consumer product industry in China is owned by American
corporations! Any tariffs applied against Chinese-made goods would also
affect American shareholders and pension funds.

As we all know from reading about the increasing numbers of strikes in
Chinese factories, wages are beginning to rise. If Japan in the 1960s and
South Korea in the 1980s is any guide then, within another 5 or 10 years,
the typical Chinese worker will be earning quite as much, if not more, than
the typical American worker. In the not too distant future, like Japan and
Korea already, China will be re-implanting factories back in America.

By then, Chinese equivalents of Andy Groves, will be complaining about the
cheap labour in Kenya, or Argentina or Burma.

If America wants to become poor as quickly as possible, then Obama should do
exactly as Groves wants. And if the American administration did, in fact,
build up a large "Scaling Bank" fund, can we imagine for one minute that the
politicians won't want to lay their hands on it for other purposes? Even if
they knew how to choose suitable new industries to "scale up" with American
labour, it's far more likely that they'll raid the fund to pay off American
government debt or help another bank "that's too big to allow to fail".

The real solution to the problem lies much further in the future than Andy
Grove can possibly imagine or that governments can possibly plan. This will
be when every country, according to its population and talents, has its own
proportionate share of the essential industries. There is no reason that
this should not happen in due course, but it will be a long time hence!

Keith




Keith Hudson, Saltford, England


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to