> In the
> meantime, an investigation was conducted by the New York Attorney General,
> who could not ascertain any criminal behaviour on the part of Israel Singer.

Then why did Bronfman fire Singer?  Quoting from Haaretz:

| Bronfman said he decided to dismiss Singer after discovering he "had
| helped himself to cash from the WJC office, my cash. This had gone on
| for a very long time." ... "The final blow came when we discovered that
| he was playing games with his hotel bills in Jerusalem," Bronfman wrote.


And "could not ascertain" sounds pretty uncertain -- after all, from New York
it's difficult to get details about Geneva accounts & Jerusalem hotel bills.
Bronfman as Singer's boss was clearly better informed than the NY AG, and
it wasn't easy to get this big decision through the WJC.


> The above-mentioned Facts articles and their allegations regarding criminal
> behaviour have violated the personality rights of Israel Singer. Facts and
> the author Daniel-Jigal Ganzfried apologize in this point to Israel Singer.

Don't you think you should apologize for calling all Swiss predators and
war profiteers?

That allegation on me is also an internal contradiction, because if I was a
Predator, I certainly wouldn't publicly advocate the Predator/Producer
dichotomy, but instead throw smoke like "working class / ruling class", etc.

Anyway, your ad-hominem slur is no substitute for properly explaining your
defense of multi-billion bottom-up re-distribution schemes.  The fact is,
you don't have a proper explanation, so you diverted attention with this
ad-hominem slur.  As Steve told you: Ad hominem doesn't refute an argument!


> Great sources you picked Chris (mine was from the Swiss Government's
> information agency...

If someone would blackmail you -- either lose all business in USA (multi-
billion) or pay up $1.25 Bn --, wouldn't you pay?  (Bergier's numbers have
been found to be massively exaggerated, both on the alleged refugees and
the money.  The sum was rather like $60 Million instead of $1.25 Billion.)

The Israeli bank Leumi is sitting on much larger "dormant" accounts (from
Holocaust victims and dead Palestinians) until today -- a couple of years
ago, Leumi only paid $5 Million instead of an estimated $20 Billion.

http://palestinechronicle.com/view_article_details.php?id=15239

Chris




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword
"igve".


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to