All too often we talk about the "bad guys" in society.  It is nice to note
that altruism is alive and well in many places.  Because there is no harm
from their actions there is little press coverage and the chattering classes
can continue to focus on the "predators" out there; which often leaves us
with the impression that bad news is the order of the day. 

 

arthur

 

From: Keith Hudson [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 7:30 AM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'; Arthur Cordell
Subject: RE: [Futurework] timesizing not downsizing

 

Arthur,

At 06:49 18/07/2010 -0400, you wrote:




Just one correction.  Tim Berners-Lee is credited with inventing the World
Wide Web.  He deserves to be recognized as some sort great humanas he did
this and seemed to have sought no monetary outcome such as trying to patent
or copyright anything. 


True enough. However, it's to be wondered whether he had any idea of just
how his innovation would be developed. Initially it was just a useful mode
of communication for scientific results. Einstein's ideas about mass/energy
conversion, and A. C. Clarke's ideas about geostationary satellites are
similar ideas that led on to the most enormous consequences. But laurels are
certainly due to scientists like Salk, who eschewed patenting his polio
vaccine even though he had a shrewd idea of the billions he could have
earned if it had been commercialized.

Keith




 

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Berners-Lee

 

 

Arthur

 

 

 

 

From: Keith Hudson [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 3:16 AM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION; Arthur Cordell
Subject: Re: [Futurework] timesizing not downsizing

 

Arthur,

"Timesizing" is not the answer to job sharing because the higher the income,
prestige, power, perks or intrinsic interest of a particular job or
profession the more that its practitioners will control the entry of too
many others and resist the knowledge-sharing that's required.

This is why, in an age of increasing automation and specializations, a new
globalized meta-class is building on the separation of the professional
middle-classes of the last two centuries and gradually becoming a
permanency. In an age when a steadily increasing proportion of young people
face a lifetime of make-work or no-work, I cannot see what the answer may
be, given the present institutional set-up -- educational, institutional,
political.

Unless, of course, the youngsters themselves start to produce the answer.
The vast majority of innovations throughout history occur to young people
(while their frontal lobes are still developing with millions of new
neurons) and, what with their mobile phones, there never has been such a
generation that is so well-connected with their peers as now, or as wary of
the protective world of the adults.

A simple idea of Alan Turing (conceived when he was 24) and subsequent work
in parental garages by other youngsters has produced the personal computer.
A simple idea of Tim Berners-Lee (conceived when he was 34) has produced the
Internet. What with nucleic acids being able to be bought off the shelf, and
a sufficiency of garages and youngsters, one never knows what wonderful new
DNA sequences may be contrived in the years to come which will blow the
present economy right off course -- and perhaps produce job-sharing and
interesting pursuits for everybody this time.  

Keith 

. At 20:09 17/07/2010 -0400, you wrote:

http://www.timesizing.com/2ts.htm

The standard response to technological innovation today is downsizing,
rationalized by the myth that "technology creates more jobs than it
destroys." The myth is belied by companies' repeated success in getting
taxbreaks by threatening to take their jobs elsewhere, by the huge increase
in makework <http://www.timesizing.com/1mkwkegs.htm>  in both public and
private sectors, and by mounting numbers of people on welfare, disability
<http://www.timesizing.com/3disab.htm> , homelessness
<http://www.timesizing.com/1homless.htm> , prison
<http://www.timesizing.com/2jailvu.htm> , forced retirement
<http://www.timesizing.com/1retire.htm>  and forced "self-employment" with
no clients. Globally, downsizing has turned the goal of competitiveness into
a race to the bottom and darkened the world's economic and ecological
outlook. But the good news is that very few changes in approach can stop the
downturn and get everything spiralling UPward again.

Keith Hudson, Saltford, England 

Keith Hudson, Saltford, England 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to