Leo Strauss and the Chicago School of materialism that merely thinks
survival.    They gave up everything to escape Hitler and lost their sense
of the value of things other than what they could use to escape persecution.
They were smart and mean.     I knew several of them, now dead.   The virus
has reached down even to my reservation and home state.     Most of the
wealthy folks I know have it and I would never call them indifferent.   They
come from every social strata, every ethnicity but mostly what the world
calls "White."    And every religion.    They have   PTSD, they're  hurt,
bitter but not all of them.      Reagan was not hurt or bitter.     Reagan
was trained by the business world.   Most of them, like Reagan, see it as a
job, a way to become affluent or continue to keep up what they want.     One
man I coached with,  in the 1970s,  went to the business world and put out
two tables.    On one table was the college educated scholarly journals with
the regular media.   The other table was empty except for one magazine.
He said:   "This table is the liberal world.     They represent the history
of America and everything that would tax you and take your money."    He
pointed to the other table and said, these are the people who represent
you!"     The table was empty except for the National Review.   "Let me
represent you he said."    At that moment they funded the "New Criterion."
The Think Tanks,  "Heritage Foundation",   "Cato"    "American Enterprise"
" Manhattan Institute"   etc.   all grew out of such meetings as did the
program to take Judges on junkets where they indoctrinated them into the
Federalist Society.       This is not indifference.   It is a deliberate
plan and they told me the plan as well as others as they were doing it.
Why me?    I socialized with them.   

 

But what set me off from them was when they began to build the connection to
the haters in the fundamentalist churches.    The very worst and bigoted
group that I walked away from and that have destroyed the connections to my
family.      One of my relatives who is very old and trapped in it says
simply:   "Well you have to play the hand you got!"      And that's the way
it is.      Are we going to talk seriously from what we know and where we
are from, or are we going to continue to play bad mitten?      What about
it.   I'm old with nothing to lose.     I'll talk.    How about you?

 

REH

 

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 3:36 PM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] FW: [p2p-research] newsweek on The Creativity
Crisis

 

The culprit?  Indifference.  The emergence of a "whatever" society.

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Harrell
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 3:14 PM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] FW: [p2p-research] newsweek on The Creativity
Crisis

 

Creativity crisis?    How about feral citizens and media that writes on a
third to fifth grade level?     Citizens that don't even know how to repeat
a movement in their body much less understand the meaning of any patterns
other than visual numbers.     Did any of you notice the paragraphs in that
Chinese writer's article that Gurstein posted?       It reminded me of a
stage work on paragraphs that Edgar Grana wrote where the entire work was
built around the rules for paragraphs.     Try finding a paragraph like that
in the NYTimes or the NYReview of Books.    Only in occasional scholarly
works is there such writing.    The average reader has ADD and can't think
their way through correct paragraph writing.     Often the NYTimes makes a
sentence a paragraph.    Hell so do I. :>))   And the Globe Mail and the
London Times (although the Brits and the NYReview writes long articles, the
paragraphs are still often just sentence thoughts)  and the Economist and
Scientific American, and..and...and.   The LA Times is said to be a third
grade level for grammar and it's intentional.     

 

It was this way long before there was a Creativity Crisis.    Check out
Richard Florida, he sometimes gets it right about the environment of
creativity.   Is there a creativity crisis before that caused these things
or did capitalism create the environment by downgrading the mean until it
created a feral readership.    There used to be literature and the pulp
media.    Now literature and the pulp media are the same.    The culprit?
He's dead.   So you can't ask him. 

 

REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Gurstein
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 1:50 PM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: [Futurework] FW: [p2p-research] newsweek on The Creativity Crisis

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michel Bauwens
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 4:03 PM
To: Peer-To-Peer Research List
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [p2p-research] newsweek on The Creativity Crisis

 


http://www.newsweek.com/2010/07/10/the-creativity-crisis.html

-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net 

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

Think tank: http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI



_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to