Greetings, Ray,

I'd like to see the pictures. Could you send them to     
[email protected]            

I can offer an essay I am working on about Chaco Canyon, its rock art and how 
our brains comprehend it; the Indian and "western scientific" approaches to 
knowing the past; and their philosophies about decay and preservation. The 
essay is about thirty pages and lots of pictures and too big for email but I 
can mail it to you if you are interested.

I am following your dialog with Ed with great interest, admiration and sympathy 
for both of you, and send both of you my thanks.  I hope you continue it here.

Lawry


On Jul 27, 2010, at 7:47 PM, Ray Harrell wrote:

> I tried to send the list pictures of my home reservation but the server 
> didn’t post them.    I have them on PDF if any of you would like for me to 
> send them to your e-mail.      
> 
>  
> 
> Ed, you are talking about me and my home.     I have done a lot with my life 
> as has my classmates.    I’m really fed up with the attitudes of people who 
> don’t know what they are talking about when it comes to human potential and 
> how to develop it.        The Indian peoples of Canada have made an attempt 
> to recover and restore the old forestry methods.  
> 
>  
> 
> What Canada seems not to have learned are the lessons that the Portuguese 
> Anthropologists of  Brazil have come to know about Indian people.   That 
> these peoples are, civilization wise, are not hunter/gather/foragers but are 
> remnants of great populations with fully developed religions, philosophies, 
> languages and relationships to the greater forest that they know in their 
> bones.    They were farmers and foresters.    Their pedagogy was the basis of 
> Rousseau’s book on education.    My Aleut Sister who spends her life rescuing 
> these processes amongst her own people would tell you a lot about the 
> pedagogical practices of the Northern Peoples.     Lessons that non-Indians 
> don’t even know exists.   
> 
>  
> 
> These economic descriptions are an insult to these people who are treated 
> like children by the dominant population and the government.      I would 
> recommend that you read some of the more enlightened Brazilian 
> anthropologists who are the leading the way in rediscovering the great 
> civilizations that no one knew existed because one Spanish boat with a few 
> Soldier’s floating down the Amazon river killed millions with their germs.    
>     The finest agricultural soils in the world are the Terra Preta Soils 
> developed by the Amazon peoples now gone.      The stone building techniques, 
> engineering and great agricultural technology that fed Europe and Napoleon’s 
> armies from the Inca people are now lost.    The growth methods of those 
> peoples that turned the Amazon jungle  into a Garden are lost and being 
> further desecrated by the European religion of the marketplace.     The 
> Spaniards didn’t just burn the books and tear down the government, they 
> deliberately desecrated everything that smacked of what they didn’t know or 
> were afraid the world might discover they didn’t know.   The English simply 
> banned the religions and set out to steal the children sending them to 
> schools to make them good English Nannies and Servants.      
> 
>  
> 
> You seem unwilling to admit the immensity of the tragedy that Europe brought 
> to over 100 million people who in a hundred years would be down to about six 
> million.    All in the name of trade and the marketplace.      Is it any 
> wonder that the Indian people of Canada would rather sniff gas and die than 
> cooperate?    Is it any wonder that the Indian languages in America call 
> Indian people ayvwiyah which means the Real people?     
> 
>  
> 
> I believe you are a man of good will.   I do not mean to put this on you but 
> you should understand that unless you live there, can speak the languages 
> fluently, know the stories and the songs and dance with them, you cannot 
> possibly understand.    The same is true of Europe.   
> 
>  
> 
> That’s why I teach Europeans their own stuff.     I had to learn about them 
> or to give into my rage and withdraw.     I’m not the only one to walk into 
> the eye of the beast.   My good friend Burl Lane from my reservation was the 
> Bassoon section leader in Sir Georg Solty’s Chicago Symphony for forty years. 
>     He’s in the upper 1% of his profession in the U.S.     My high school  
> friend Don Johnson was the CEO of the Modine Corporation one of the Fortune 
> 500 companies.    My cousin Mickey Mantle played for the Yankees and Gary 
> Brown a French Horn player friend in my high school band was a leading 
> anti-war lawyer for the JAG corps for the Navy during Vietnam and today has a 
> firm in Washington, D.C.      I could go on and on about the people I am 
> proud to come from and be a part of.      We all came out of the shacks and 
> shanties of the worst Super Fund Toxic waste site in America.    So bad and 
> impossible to clean up for the lead and heavy metal pollution that they 
> closed the place down and fenced it off last year.     We were all  there 
> when the mines were in full bloom.   It actually looks picturesque now that 
> there’s no more money to be made off of the bodies of Indian children.     
> But we did not capitulate and never gave in!     
> 
>  
> 
> You give in too easily.   You would not make a good Indian.     But you are a 
> good and civil gentleman and I hope I have not offended you.
> 
>  
> 
> REH
> 
>  
> 
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 5:45 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Futurework] Stuckedness
> 
>  
> 
> I've recently argued that people, especially the young, in the poorest 
> classes cannot easily escape the lot they've been given, even if they aspire 
> to a better life.  Much of my professional life has involved working on the 
> problems faced by Canada's aboriginal people.  Back in about 1990 I undertook 
> a study of communities would be impacted by a uranium mine in the north of 
> one of our prairie provinces.  Here's my take on the position of one of those 
> communities.
> 
>  
> 
> Ed
> 
>  
> 
> Undoubtedly, the community had valid economic and social reasons for existing 
> at one time. During the fur and mission era, it serviced a largely 
> subsistence, partly commercial (fur trapping, commercial fishing, casual 
> labor) population that was widely dispersed on the land much of the time.
> 
> The descendants of that population were drawn into town by a series of 
> government requirements that were imposed mostly during the post WWII era: 
> the requirement that kids attend school regularly; that the school be in the 
> community; that health and hospital services be provided where people live 
> (which was turned around into the requirement that people live where the 
> health and hospital services are provided); that people be housed at national 
> and provincial standards for Indians, and that community physical and service 
> infrastructure exist to support that housing; that people be conveniently 
> located so that welfare and other forms of subsidy could be administered to 
> them; etc.
> 
> It has become a symbiotic community: All of the institutions have been 
> provided in a single place which in the administrative view is appropriate to 
> the population and that allows government institutions to provide their 
> services conveniently. The people, having lost their independence need the 
> institutions. But the institutions also need the people to justify their 
> existence in the community.
> 
> Socially, the population maintains many of the values and attitudes of its 
> land based culture. The people continue to try to be hunters, trappers, 
> fishers and foragers, though being those things while living in the community 
> full time is very difficult. So some of the land-based skills and attitudes 
> have been converted to skills that allow survival in town, with foraging for 
> money among the various bureaucracies being an especially useful skill.
> 
> Such foraging makes economic sense, since the community has no industrial 
> base. The only real income base, now and in future, is government, 
> supplemented by occasional construction, some local business, some fishing, 
> etc.
> 
> Yet the money that the foragers obtain does not always make good sense 
> socially. Wives often see one purpose in money - feeding the family - but 
> husbands all too often see quite another - having a good time with their 
> friends. This often leads to family violence.
> 
> The government institutions which service the community are there not only to 
> support and service the population, they are there to change it. They are not 
> really support services in the sense of helping people achieve their own 
> aspirations, they are coercive agents of social change - social engineers. 
> When they put some of the administration of programs into local hands, they 
> nevertheless maintain tight control to ensure that it is their objectives and 
> not those of the local people that are met.
> 
> The outcome has been a disruption and fragmentation of the community. Many 
> people buy into the institutionally driven values, attitudes and actions, and 
> the old ways get pushed into the background. The elders remain respected as 
> custodians of old memories, but in reality wield little influence. They have 
> taken on the roles of cultural icons, not much more.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to