REH wrote: > 1. Give your sources about Soros His father wrote about it in his book "Masquerade: dancing around death in Nazi-occupied Hungary".
> I know a lot about that story. You always know the NYC version of history. > It would be easy to group stereotype them as > predators according to your definition. But I don't stereotype any GROUP as predators! Gurstein does, and you didn't disagree with him. > They came with the marauders to > Jamestown and were not particularly moral but were particularly venal and > ignorant. They have been here from the first invasion and the only things > that's saved them is the benign image of chocolate which they stole from us. The fact that some of our scum was part of the first invasion (like the scum of other nations) doesn't say much about the Swiss who remained here. > I can be just as prejudiced, bigoted and stereotypical as you. Hello? Can you quote a single statement from me that is "prejudiced, bigoted and stereotypical"?? Your statements about "the Swiss" certainly are. > We do not have a good history with the Swiss. You don't have a good history with any nation, not even with other First Nations. But of course it's always easy to blame "the Swiss", which is chic especially in NYC. > 2. You missed the point completely about the "reality show". You missed it. > 3. Wealthy people have property. Apparatchics had no property and had only > a pension upon retirement. They also lost their connections. Are you kidding? Apparatchics had datchas, expensive cars, even hunting grounds (as Predators want), privileges, ... you name it. And many kept their connections. They're called turn-coats for a reason. > I see no > comparison at all except as technocrats they were paid better than others That's nonsense. A technology professor earned less than a taxi driver. The "techno" part didn't matter -- the apparatchik part did. > 4. Did the Swiss ever return those Gypsy Children they stole from their > families? Yep. Did the NYT ever notice that this practice wasn't limited to Switzerland at all (not even to Europe)? The Gypsies here drive around in Mercedes cars & mobile homes -- do the Cherokees too? (I guess most of them can't even afford a Jeep Cherokee.) > Should I stereotype all Swiss this way because of you and your comments > which I consider border on slander? Your claim is slander. Quote my statements of "stereotype". > I don't like talking the way I did above. You already talked that way long before I began talking of Predators. > Putting myself in another person's shoes is a foundational part of my > culture. Earlier, you claimed that people of your culture would immediately stop talking to me and walk away, and you just keep talking because you're a NYer. > When I assume the shoes of the person writing these posts to me, > it does not feel balanced somehow. You should think about that. First provide my quotes that justify your slander. Chris ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword "igve". _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
